CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03372031Updated Dec 15, 2017

The Effectiveness of Piano Therapy vs. Piano Listening on Manual Dexterity in the Elderly

An interventional study of Piano training (Active) and Piano Training (Passive) in Aging, Manual Dexterity and Piano Therapy, sponsored by Westminster College. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-15.

Sponsored by Westminster College · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Does active piano practice help recover hand dexterity in older adults, or does social interaction and music-listening alone affect motor performance? Researchers hypothesized improved dexterity after active piano playing, but not after passive piano listening. 15 residents of a retirement community were partnered together and completed 2 two-week piano training modules. In module 1, one partner played piano exercises and songs while the other listened. In module 2, partners switched roles. The Purdue Pegboard Test and Box and Block Test assessed fine and gross motor dexterity, before, between, and after the training modules. A repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time on overall fine and gross motor function, but there was no main effect of playing versus listening. Results did not support the hypothesis, but indicate that piano-based therapy requires greater than 2 weeks to begin improving dexterity and may influenced co-occurring socialization.

Read the detailed description

The primary finding of this study is that older adults demonstrate improvements in manual dexterity after four weeks of piano training, but do not improve significantly after just two weeks. Furthermore, it does not matter whether the participants actively play for the first part and passively listen for the second part or vice versa.

Of the three proposed mechanisms of Music Supported Therapy (MST) explained in the introduction, the findings of this study may be best explained by the emotion-motivation mechanism. Though dexterity scores were organized by whether the scores followed an active playing module, all participants experienced the same amount of music-listening and social interaction. Whether the participant was playing the music him/herself or observing, both groups were always hearing the same songs and scales for the same amount of time. The emotion-motivation mechanism states that this music-listening alone may increase cognitive processes like working memory and boost both mood and motivation. Therefore, these findings may mean that listening to piano music helps dexterity performance in older adults; but it does so if and only if the participants experience the music-listening module for a sufficient duration of time.

Along with music-listening, social interaction was consistent between active and passive groups throughout the study. This interpersonal interaction may also have had an effect on mood and motivation, as piano instructors provided high levels of encouragement and complimented the participants' progress often. Relationship quality between patient and therapist is correlated with efficacy of therapy. This concept of increased socialization contributing to dexterity improvements is also supported by a study that identified social participation as a preventative factor of perceptual speed decline in older adults.

Not finding the hypothesized effect of active versus passive condition on dexterity could be due to dexterous activities that the participants were engaged in outside of the training modules. For example, three of the 15 participants reported that they currently play piano in their free time, so it can be conjectured that those participants were engaged in active piano playing even when they were in the passive listening module. Other activities enjoyed by participants include exercise classes and painting-both of which could have been improving or maintaining their dexterity throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aging
  • Manual Dexterity
  • Piano Therapy

Keywords

  • Music Supported Therapy
  • plasticity
  • multisensory integration
  • bimanual coupling
  • auditory feedback
  • dexterity
  • piano therapy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to physically and cognitively withstand 30 minute piano training sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active-Passive

    Active Piano training (8 sessions in two weeks) followed by listening to piano training (8 sessions in 2 weeks) (Passive condition)

    Behavioral: Piano training (Active) · Behavioral: Piano Training (Passive)

  • Experimental
    Passive-Active

    Passive piano training listening (8 sessions in two weeks) followed by active piano training (8 sessions in two weeks)

    Behavioral: Piano training (Active) · Behavioral: Piano Training (Passive)

Interventions

  • BehavioralPiano training (Active)

    Piano Curriculum. Participants were all trained on one of four 88-key pianos located in the assisted living facility. Piano instructors were 6 undergraduate Music Education and Music Performance majors. Each lesson of the week had a different focus: right and left hands separately, bimanually coupled, and bimanually uncoupled (Loehrer et al., 2016). Each week of the module had a different focus as well: notes played one step apart, notes played multiple steps apart (intervals), and tones played together (two-note chords) (van Vugt et al., 2016; Villeneuve et al., 2014). Each session began with skill exercises and ended with learning a simple, recognizable song. Two participants with extensive piano experience progressed to playing duets with the instructor and hymns out of a hymnal after mastery of the study curriculum. These training protocols were based on those of Schneider and colleagues' 2007 study.

    Also known as: Piano Training (Passive)

  • BehavioralPiano Training (Passive)

    Participants listened to their research partner complete 8 active piano training sessions across 2 weeks.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Purdue Pegboard

    Fine Motor Manual Dexterity

    Time frame: 10 minutes

  2. Box and Block Test

    Gross Motor Dexterity

    Time frame: 5 minutes

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Shanango on the Green
    New Wilmington, Pennsylvania 16172, United States
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Latimer J, Adams RD. The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;93(4):470-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120137. Epub 2012 Nov 8. PubMed 23139428 ↗
  • Jones L, Karageorghis CI, Ekkekakis P. Can high-intensity exercise be more pleasant?: attentional dissociation using music and video. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014 Oct;36(5):528-41. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2013-0251. PubMed 25356615 ↗
  • Lovden M, Ghisletta P, Lindenberger U. Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. Psychol Aging. 2005 Sep;20(3):423-34. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.423. PubMed 16248702 ↗
  • Vuilleumier P, Trost W. Music and emotions: from enchantment to entrainment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1337:212-22. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12676. PubMed 25773637 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — no identifiers. Confidential data.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03372031
Lead sponsor
Westminster College
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
Start date
Aug 30, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2017
Completion
Dec 1, 2017
Last update
Dec 15, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion