ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03357614Updated Dec 29, 2020Results posted

Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Complicated UTI in Adults

A Phase 3 interventional study of Sulopenem and Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, sponsored by Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited. Completed at 32 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-29.

Sponsored by Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,395
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare the efficacy and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
03

In context

Urinary Tract Infections

803 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Tract Infections; 133 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,395 is above the median of 131 across 560 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Tract Infections.

Browse Urinary Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults ≥18 years of age with more than 24 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a UTI
  2. Able to provide
  3. Clinically documented pyelonephritis or complicated urinary tract infection:

    1. Pyelonephritis with normal anatomy
    2. Complicated UTI as defined by one or more of the following factors:

    i. The presence of an indwelling catheter ii. >100 mL of residual urine after voiding iii. Neurogenic bladder iv. Obstructive uropathy due to nephrolithiasis, tumor or fibrosis v. Azotemia due to intrinsic renal disease vi. Urinary retention in men possibly due to benign prostatic hypertrophy vii. Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy

  4. At least two of the following signs or symptoms:

    1. Rigors, chills or fever/hypothermia
    2. Flank pain or pelvic pain
    3. Nausea or vomiting
    4. Dysuria, urinary frequency or urinary urgency
    5. Costovertebral angle tenderness on physical examination
  5. A mid-stream urine specimen with:

    1. a dipstick analysis positive for nitrite AND
    2. evidence of pyuria as defined by either: i. a dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase AND/OR ii. at least 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter on microscopic analysis of unspun urine AND/OR iii. White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-powered field in urine sediment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours during the previous 72 hours. Patients who have objective documentation of clinical progression of cUTI while on antibacterial drug therapy, or patients who received antibacterial drugs for surgical prophylaxis and then develop cUTI, may be appropriate for enrollment.
  2. Subjects with an organism isolated from the urine within the last year known to be resistant to ertapenem
  3. Severe structural or functional urinary tract abnormality responsible for an intractable infection which in the opinion of the investigator would require > 10 days of therapy or post-treatment prophylaxis (eg. patients with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux).
  4. Uncomplicated UTI
  5. Patients with paraplegia/quadriplegia
  6. Hypotension with systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg
  7. Complicated UTI associated with complete obstruction, emphysematous pyelonephritis, known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess or expected to require surgical intervention (not placement of catheters) to achieve cure
  8. Patients with a known history of myasthenia gravis
  9. Patients who require concomitant administration of tizanidine or valproic acid
  10. Patients with a history of allergy to carbapenems or quinolones or amoxicillin-clavulanate or other beta-lactams, or to probenecid
  11. Renal transplantation
  12. Patients requiring dialysis
  13. Acute or chronic prostatitis
  14. High risk for cUTI caused by Pseudomonas sp. (eg,. history of prior UTI due to Pseudomonas species, recent use, others)
  15. Chronic indwelling catheters or stents
  16. Ileal loops or vesico-urethral reflux
  17. Recent trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract within the prior 30 days
  18. History of seizures
  19. Patients with a history of blood dyscrasias
  20. Patients with a history of uric acid kidney stones
  21. Patients with acute gouty attack
  22. Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy
  23. Females of who are unable to take adequate precautions, have a positive pregnancy test result within 24 hours of study entry, are otherwise known to be pregnant, or are currently breastfeeding an infant.
  24. Male subjects must agree to use of an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 14 days post treatment
  25. Patients known to have a history of liver or kidney disease or neutropenia as defined by the following baseline laboratory criteria:

    • (ALT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 X
    • Total > 2 X Upper Limit of Normal
    • Neutropenia (\<1000 cells/mm3)
  26. Patients participating in any other clinical study that involved the administration of an medication
  27. Patient
  28. Patients unlikely to comply with the protocol
  29. Patients considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,395 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sulopenem

    Sulopenem 1000 mg IV once daily for a minimum of 5 days, followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 total days of treatment

    Drug: Sulopenem · Drug: Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid

  • Active comparator
    Ertapenem

    Ertapenem 1000 mg IV once daily for a minimum of 5 days, followed by ciprofloxacin 500 mg PO twice daily or amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 total days of treatment

    Drug: Ertapenem · Drug: Ciprofloxacin · Drug: Amoxicillin-clavulanate

Interventions

  • Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

  • DrugSulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid

    Drug pages: Sulopenem etzadroxil · Probenecid

    Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

  • Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

    Also known as: Invanz

  • Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

    Also known as: Cipro

  • DrugAmoxicillin-clavulanate

    Drug pages: Amoxicillin · Clavulanic Acid

    Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

    Also known as: Augmentin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Overall Success

    Clinical success is defined as complete resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new cUTI symptoms; microbiologic success is defined as eradication of the bacterial pathogen found at study entry (reduced to \<1000 CFU/mL)

    Time frame: Day 21 +/- 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success

    Microbiologic success is defined as demonstrating \<1000 CFU/mL of the baseline urpathogen by quantitative urine culture

    Time frame: Day 21 +/- 1 day

07

Results

Posted Dec 29, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSulopenemErtapenem
Started697698
Completed672670
Not completed2528

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Overall Success

Clinical success is defined as complete resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new cUTI symptoms; microbiologic success is defined as eradication of the bacterial pathogen found at study entry (reduced to \<1000 CFU/mL)

Time frame:
Day 21 +/- 1 day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Overall Success
ParticipantsSulopenemErtapenem
Percentage of Participants With Overall Success301325
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success

Microbiologic success is defined as demonstrating \<1000 CFU/mL of the baseline urpathogen by quantitative urine culture

Time frame:
Day 21 +/- 1 day
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success
ParticipantsSulopenemErtapenem
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success316343

Adverse events

Collected over From the time of informed consent through the final visit, an average of 28 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sulopenem2/697 (0.3%)14/697 (2%)0/697 (0%)
Ertapenem0/698 (0%)6/698 (0.9%)0/698 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventSulopenemErtapenem
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations5/6970/698
Pyelonephritis acuteInfections and infestations2/6970/698
PyelonephritisInfections and infestations0/6972/698
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders1/6970/698
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders1/6970/698
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/6970/698
Pyelonephritis chronicInfections and infestations1/6971/698
Renal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/6970/698
Salivary gland neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/6970/698
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders1/6971/698

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Mean57.8 ± 18.259.3 ± 18.258.5 ± 18.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Female389380769
Male308318626
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Hispanic or Latino222042
Not Hispanic or Latino6726751347
Unknown or Not Reported336
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Latvia314273
Hungary7047117
United States303161
Georgia8192173
Estonia161834
Bulgaria150145295
Czechia81018
Poland336
Russia180194374
Serbia145
Slovakia10818
Ukraine10998207
Croatia8614
Diabetes
Diabetes(Participants)SulopenemErtapenemTotal
Count of participants114114228
08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Medical Facility
    Bellflower, California 90706, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Chula Vista, California 91911, United States
  • Medical Facility
    La Mesa, California 91942, United States
  • Medical Facility
    La Palma, California 90623, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Miami Lakes, Florida 33014, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Idaho Falls, Idaho 83404, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Butte, Montana 59701, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Columbus, Ohio 43214, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Columbus, Ohio 43215, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Houston, Texas 77057, United States
  • Medical Facility
    Kohtla-Järve, 31025, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Tallinn, 10617, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Võru, 65526, Estonia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 00144, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 00159, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Tbilisi, 00160, Georgia
  • Medical Facility
    Baja, 6500, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Budapest, 01204, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Nagykanizsa, 8800, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Nyiregyhaza, 4400, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Szentes, 06600, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Tatabánya, 2800, Hungary
  • Medical Facility
    Daugavpils, LV5417, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Liepāja, LV3414, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Riga, LV1002, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Riga, LV1038, Latvia
  • Medical Facility
    Valmiera, LV4201, Latvia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dunne MW, Aronin SI, Das AF, Akinapelli K, Breen J, Zelasky MT, Puttagunta S. Sulopenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including Pyelonephritis: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):78-88. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac704. PubMed 36068705 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 29, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03357614
Lead sponsor
Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 30, 2017
Start date
Sep 18, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 14, 2019
Completion
Dec 14, 2019
Results posted
Dec 29, 2020
Last update
Dec 29, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Sulopenem · Sulopenem etzadroxil · Probenecid

Start the discussion