CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03345888Updated Nov 17, 2017

To Compare Predictive Power of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Between Different Time Line During Resuscitation

An observational study in Resuscitation, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-17.

Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
130
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To analyze a multi-center observational study database. to select adult non-traumatic in-hospital cardiac arrest. Review and recored end-tidal carbon dioxide in per minute. Arrange them in different time line. one is in resuscitation time. The other is the time line which the beginning time is the time of starting appearing stable end-tidal carbon dioxide wave.To compare predictive power of end-tidal carbon dioxide between different time line during resuscitation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Resuscitation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

CPR patient being treated in the emergency department

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

adult non-traumatic in-hospital cardiac arrest patients Exclusion Criteria:1) surrogate decision of Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) during CPR; 2) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient; 3) trauma as the main reason for medical treatment; 4) child or adolescent patients; 5) Petco2 value was not recorded effectively; 6) delay from initial CPR to starting to record Petco2 exceeded 30 min; and 7) screening by qualified experts. More than three experienced physicians thought that the patient's Petco2 value was too extreme to agree with his/her medical history, and the value was seen as an error and was excluded

04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • resuscitation time line group

    The ETCO2 will be arrange in resuscitation time line.

    Other: predictive power of end-tidal carbon dioxide

  • ETCO2 time line group

    The ETCO2 will be arrange in time line which the beginning time is the time of starting to show stable ETCO2 wave.

    Other: predictive power of end-tidal carbon dioxide

Interventions

  • Otherpredictive power of end-tidal carbon dioxide

    end-tidal carbon dioxide predicts resuscitation outcomes

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. predictive power of ETCO2 is week at the beginning of resuscitation

    the later predictive power of ETCO2 is better during 30min resuscitation

    Time frame: 1 week

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    Beijing, 100730, China
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03345888
Lead sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Nov 10, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 17, 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 17, 2017

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion