ClinicalTrials.gg
Sign In
Status unknownNCT03344445Updated Mar 9, 2018

Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit

An interventional study of video-assisted pre anesthesia explain in Anesthesia, sponsored by IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch. Status unknown. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-09.

Sponsored by IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2017, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction

Read the detailed description

We made up a video which showed the type, the method, the risk, and the benefit of all anesthesia with words, pictures, and image. A study nurse will ask the will of patients. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly divided into traditional group(control group) and study group(study group). The study group will watch the video at first, then our anesthesiologist visit the patient. The control group will receive traditional anesthesiologist visit. After doctors' visit, the patients have to complete a test and a questionnaire. The patients who don't participate in the study will have traditional visit and no test.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months, was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    traditional vist

    Patients receive traditional anesthesiologist visit

  • Experimental
    video-assisted

    Patients watch the video, then an anesthesiologist visit

    Other: video-assisted pre anesthesia explain

Interventions

  • Othervideo-assisted pre anesthesia explain

    Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. inform gain analysis

    The score of test would represent the inform gain of patient

    Time frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data

  2. satification anaylsis

    The score of questionnaire represent the ratification of patient

    Time frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yang YL, Wang KJ, Chen WH, Chuang KC, Tseng CC, Liu CC. Improved satisfaction of preoperative patients after group video-teaching during interview at preanesthetic evaluation clinic: the experience of a medical center in Taiwan. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):149-54. PubMed 17972617 ↗
  • Snyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5. PubMed 15920209 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2018, 23 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 13, 2017
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
StartActual
Jan 1, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2018
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2018
Last update
Mar 9, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03344445
Lead sponsor
IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch
Responsible party
IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch (Department of Anesthesia, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 9, 2018

Study contacts

Li Kuei Chen, M.D.
study chair · National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies from this sponsor

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch

Start the discussion