ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03335930Updated Nov 9, 2017

Exercise-induced Blood Glucose Response in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Tri-Service General Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-09.

Sponsored by Tri-Service General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 years 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2009, registered Nov 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Exercise is recommended for type 2 diabetes, which is a global health problem. However, during a moderate-intensity exercise training there is an unpredictable risk of hypoglycemia for patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, the investigators aim to explore trends in blood glucose levels in response to a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training in patients with type 2 diabetes and to explore the predictors of post-exercise blood glucose (PEBG) and exercise-induced glucose response (EIGR). A descriptive and longitudinal design was conducted. Eligible type 2 diabetes patients were recruited from outpatient clinics of a medical center in Taiwan and invited to participate in a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise-training program. Each participant received 36 repeated measures of blood glucose during the exercise training program. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three exercise times (morning/afternoon/evening). Each exercise session was took place 1 to 2 hours after a meal. Capillary blood glucose levels were measured pre- and post-exercise. The EIGR was calculated from subtracting the PEBG from the before-exercise blood glucose (BEBG). Generalized estimating equation was used to examine the trends and predictors of PEBG and EIGR.

Read the detailed description

A prospective and longitudinal design using purposive sampling was used. All eligible Taiwanese participants with T2DM at a medical centre were invited to participate in the exercise-training programme that included three sessions per week, 30 minutes per session for 12 weeks (total 36 sessions). Each participant's exercise sessions were equally randomised into three times of day (morning/08:00-10:00, afternoon/14:00-16:00 evening/18:00-20:00) using permuted-block randomisation. Capillary blood glucose samples were obtained before and after each 30-minute moderate-intensity (60% VO2max) exercise session. The EIGR, described as the difference between BEBG and PEBG values, was calculated.

Participants and setting: Participants with T2DM being seen at an outpatient clinic in a northern Taiwan medical centre were recruited by an endocrinology/metabolism physician. Participants, 40-60 years of age, diagnosed as having T2DM based on the criterion of the American Diabetes Association, and were being treated with oral antidiabetic medications only were eligible. Other inclusion criteria were (1) able to speak and understand Mandarin; (2) able to walk without assistance; (3) have no regular exercise habit; and (4) agree to join in a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training after passing a graded exercise test (GXT), described below. Exclusion criteria included insulin therapy, a history of cancer, end-stage renal disease with dialysis, an inability to participate in exercise training due to comorbid neurological and musculoskeletal conditions, severe comorbidity or complications such as heart failure, autonomic neuropathy, and recent stroke within 6 months.

Under an effect size of 0.2, thirty-six numbers of measurements with a correlation efficient of 0.32 among repeated measures, an expected power of 0.7 to 0.8, and an alpha of 0.05, the required sample size was between 12 and 14 based on repeat measures (within factors). Therefore, initially 52 T2DM patients were approached and seventeen eligible participants were invited by a research nurse to receive GXT. Fifteen passed the exercise test based on the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) for exercise testing. A second research nurse assessed the baseline characteristics (eg, self-reported demographics and lifestyle patterns, blood analyses and anthropometric measures) of the final 15 participants. Participants were then invited to perform 36 exercise sessions (3 sessions/week for 12 weeks), which were randomly assigned to morning, afternoon, or evening using permuted-block randomization, except two dropped out after exercise test.

Graded exercise test: The GXT was performed using a motorised treadmill (Trackmaster 400, JAS Fitness System, USA) for identification of maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), maximum heart rate (HRmax) and the risk for potentially life-threatening cardiovascular disease (eg, myocardial infarction). GXT procedures followed a modified Balke protocol.20 Two observers (a medical/rehabilitation doctor and a research nurse) were involved with each patient throughout the GXT. The GXT was immediately stopped if the patient complained of exhaustion; reached maximum heart rate or VO2max, determined by the maximal amount of blood the heart pumps per minute (cardiac output) and the amount of oxygen utilised by the exercising muscles (arterial-venous oxygen difference); had a respiratory exchange ratio >1.15; developed symptoms such as chest pain, dyspnea, pallor, diaphoresis or dizziness; had systolic pressure greater than 250 mm Hg or diastolic pressure greater than 120 mm Hg; had a decrease in systolic pressure of more than 10 mm Hg compared to the systolic pressure at rest; or requested stopping the test.

Ethical consideration: Institutional review board approval (TSGHIRB: 097-05-157) was obtained from Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan. All participants gave written informed consent when invited to join the study. Participants were assured that their participation was entirely voluntary and that they could withdraw at any time.

Data analysis: Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive data are presented as mean/standard deviation (SD) and numbers/percentage (%). Before evaluating the trend of blood glucose response during the 12-week/36-session exercise-training programme, two variables including "training month (1st, 2nd and 3rd month of the training)" and "timing of exercise sessions (1st to 36th session of exercise)" were coded. With generalised estimating equations (GEE), the investigators examined the change patterns of BEBG, PEBG and EIGR over time during the training programme. The trend analyes of BEBG, PEBG and EIGR were adjusted for covariates (i.e, age, gender, baseline body mass index, VO2max, HgbA1c, antidiabetic medication (metformin, sulfonylureas or repaglinide) and exercise time of day (morning, afternoon or evening). When evaluating the predictors of EIGR and PEBG, univariable analysis was applied first and, following the multivariable analysis, incorporated with those significant covariates from univariable analysis. All of the statistical analyses were two-tailed and considered significant at p \< .05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • exercise
  • blood glucose response
  • metabolic control
  • type 2 diabetes.
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

Tri-Service General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 108 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 40-60 years of age
  • diagnosed as having T2DM based on the criterion of the American Diabetes Association
  • being treated with oral antidiabetic medications
  • able to speak and understand Mandarin
  • able to walk without assistance
  • have no regular exercise habit
  • agree to join in a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training after passing a graded exercise test.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • receiving insulin therapy
  • a history of cancer, end-stage renal disease with dialysis
  • inability to participate in exercise training due to comorbid neurological and musculoskeletal conditions
  • severe comorbidity or complications such as heart failure, autonomic neuropathy, and recent stroke within 6 months.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Morning exercise

    To exercise at morning (08:00-10:00)

    Behavioral: a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training

  • Active comparator
    Afternoon exercise

    To exercise at afternoon (14:00-16:00)

    Behavioral: a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training

  • Active comparator
    Evening exercise

    To exercise at evening (18:00-20:00)

    Behavioral: a 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training

Interventions

  • Behaviorala 12-week moderate-intensity exercise training

    a 12-week, aerobic, moderate-intensity exercise training

    Also known as: aerobic exercise training

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. exercise-induced glucose response

    trend analysis of exercise-induced glucose response following a 12-week exercise training

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. metabolic control/ trend of before-exercise blood glucose

    trend analysis of before-exercise blood glucose following a 12-week exercise training

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. trend of post-exercise blood glucose

    trend analysis of post-exercise blood glucose following a 12-week exercise training

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Duclos M, Virally ML, Dejager S. Exercise in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: what are the benefits and how does it work? Phys Sportsmed. 2011 May;39(2):98-106. doi: 10.3810/psm.2011.05.1899. PubMed 21673489 ↗
  • Karjalainen JJ, Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Piira OP, Lepojarvi ES, Perkiomaki JS, Junttila MJ, Huikuri HV, Tulppo MP. Effects of physical activity and exercise training on cardiovascular risk in coronary artery disease patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):706-15. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2216. Epub 2015 Jan 15. PubMed 25592198 ↗
  • Koivula RW, Tornberg AB, Franks PW. Exercise and diabetes-related cardiovascular disease: systematic review of published evidence from observational studies and clinical trials. Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Jun;13(3):372-80. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0373-0. PubMed 23494754 ↗
  • Rohling M, Herder C, Roden M, Stemper T, Mussig K. Effects of Long-Term Exercise Interventions on Glycaemic Control in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016 Sep;124(8):487-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106293. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PubMed 27437921 ↗
  • Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Fernhall B, Regensteiner JG, Blissmer BJ, Rubin RR, Chasan-Taber L, Albright AL, Braun B; American College of Sports Medicine; American Diabetes Association. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement executive summary. Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2692-6. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1548. No abstract available. PubMed 21115771 ↗
  • Gulve EA. Exercise and glycemic control in diabetes: benefits, challenges, and adjustments to pharmacotherapy. Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1297-321. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080114. Epub 2008 Sep 18. PubMed 18801852 ↗
  • Way KL, Hackett DA, Baker MK, Johnson NA. The Effect of Regular Exercise on Insulin Sensitivity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diabetes Metab J. 2016 Aug;40(4):253-71. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2016.40.4.253. Epub 2016 Aug 2. PubMed 27535644 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — After our research results were published. We will share our Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and Clinical Study Report (CSR).

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2009 to primary completion in Nov 2009, 8 months.

Of 2,066 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's 8 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,243 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 5, 2017
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
StartActual
Mar 1, 2009
Primary completionActual
Nov 30, 2009
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2009
Last update
Nov 9, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03335930
Responsible party
CHIA-HUEI LIN, PhD (Assistant Professor, Tri-Service General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2009
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2009
Completion
Dec 31, 2009
Last update
Nov 9, 2017

Study contacts

Chia-Huei Lin, PhD
principal investigator · Tri-Service General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion