ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03316378APBUpdated Jul 5, 2019Results posted

Achilles Pain Block

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Ropivacaine injection in Achilles Tendon Pain, sponsored by Ruth Chimenti. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-05.

Sponsored by Ruth Chimenti · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Basic science

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Oct 2017).
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 77 studies testing ropivacaine in Pain — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Ropivacaine · Pain.

Enrollment
44th of 77
46 · median 60
Started
2016
with 5 others
Phase 2/3
2 of 77
none open now
Registered
57th of 77
by date

Among the 77 studies testing ropivacaine in Pain, this one is the 44th largest by enrollment, is one of 6 that started in 2016, is one of 2 in phase 2/3, and was the 57th registered.

By phase

77 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 434 · 1 open
No phase26 · 1 open
Phase 39 · 1 open
Phase 12 · 0 open
Phase 1/22 · 0 open
Phase 22 · 0 open
Phase 2/3this study2 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2001; this study’s year is marked. 6 started in 2016.

Size and results

Median enrollment 60 across the 77 interventional studies. Of the 55 that completed or were terminated, 17 (31%) have results posted.

Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 77 studies testing ropivacaine in Pain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand how the peripheral and central nervous system interact to produce the sensation of pain and motor patterns in patients with achilles tendinopathy (AT). These findings will motivate the development of future clinical studies that incorporate knowledge about pain processing and movement strategies in patients with tendinopathy. Participants with achilles tendinopathy will receive an anesthetic injection to the achilles tendon in order to examine how reduced pain, detected by the peripheral nervous system, alters task performance and perception of pain. We hypothesize that there are factors within the central nervous system that contribute to continued pain and disability in patients with chronic AT.

Read the detailed description

Twenty three people with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) and 23 people without AT will participate in this single visit clinical study. Participants will rate their pain with pressure to the heel, leg and elbow, climb stairs and perform a novel task in a motion capture system, and complete questionnaires on how pain affects their daily life. All subjects will complete these measures twice, and for participants with AT they will complete this battery of tests before and after an anesthetic injection to the area of pain. This study has 2 aims:

Specific Aim 1 compares measures of altered central processing in patients with chronic AT to adults without chronic pain; we hypothesize that patients with chronic AT will demonstrate signs of altered central processing, including central sensitization (lower pressure pain threshold), psychosocial factors (higher kinesiophobia), and/or altered motor control (lower ankle power during stair ascent).

Specific Aim 2 determines which indicators of altered central processing persist after a local anesthetic injection to the Achilles tendon in patients with chronic AT; we hypothesize chronic AT pain is perpetuated by altered central processing that persists in the absence of continued peripheral nociception.

03

Conditions studied

  • Achilles Tendon Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Human
  • Pain
  • Biomechanics
  • Anesthetics
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

For patients with AT

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of chronic (>3 months) AT, consisting of pain with pressure at the achilles tendon and report of pain that is aggravated by physical activity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of foot or ankle surgery, bilateral lateral epicondyle tendinopathy
  • Comorbidity that would be aggravated by placing hand in water (Raynaud's, thoracic outlet syndrome)
  • Comorbidity (e.g. stroke, neurological disorder) that limits ability to participate in exercise
  • Comorbidity (e.g. rheumatic disease, fibromyalgia) that contributes to pain with activity
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Previous adverse response to a local anesthetic injection
  • Are pregnant
  • Are a ballroom dancer

For control participants

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sex, Age and -matched to participant with AT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No history of tendinopathy
  • No condition that limited activity in the past 6 months
  • History of foot or ankle surgery, bilateral lateral epicondyle tendinopathy
  • Comorbidity that would be aggravated by placing hand in water (Raynaud's, thoracic outlet syndrome)
  • Comorbidity (e.g. stroke, neurological disorder) that limits ability to participate in exercise
  • Comorbidity (e.g. rheumatic disease, fibromyalgia) that contributes to pain with activity
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Are pregnant
  • Are a ballroom dancer
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group with Achilles Tendinopathy

    Ropivacaine injection. While looking at the Achilles tendon with ultrasound, the orthopaedic physician will inject 4 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (numbing medicine) around the area of pain. The needle may be directed just under the skin (and above the tendon) and/or deep to the tendon.

    Drug: Ropivacaine injection

  • No intervention
    Group without Achilles Tendinopathy

    The control group did not receive an injection between test repetitions

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Central Sensitization

    Pressure pain threshold (PPT) at heel on contralateral side. A pressure algometer (Somedic, Farsta, Sweden) was applied perpendicular to the skin at a rate of 50 kilopascal/s with a 1cm2 tip. The participants pressed a button when the sensation of pressure first became painful (1/10 on NPRS). The mean of 3 trials per area represented the PPT.

    Time frame: Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection

  2. Pain Psychology

    Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK, score range 17 to 68). A decrease in TSK would indicate a decrease in fear of injury (and/or re-injury)

    Time frame: Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection

  3. Movement System

    Change in peak ankle power during the stance phase of gait during stair ascent, which will be assessed by syncing movement data from 3-dimensional motion analysis with ground reaction force data from a force plate. Peak positive ankle power reflects the ability of the plantar flexor muscles to concentrically generate speed and force at the ankle joint.

    Time frame: Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection

07

Results

Posted Jul 5, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles Tendinopathy
Started2323
Completed2323
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryCentral Sensitization

Pressure pain threshold (PPT) at heel on contralateral side. A pressure algometer (Somedic, Farsta, Sweden) was applied perpendicular to the skin at a rate of 50 kilopascal/s with a 1cm2 tip. The participants pressed a button when the sensation of pressure first became painful (1/10 on NPRS). The mean of 3 trials per area represented the PPT.

Time frame:
Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Reported as:
Mean · kilopascal
Central Sensitization
kilopascalGroup With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles Tendinopathy
Before Anesthetic Injection463.5 (375.2 to 551.8)383.6 (297.4 to 469.8)
After Anesthetic Injection425.7 (345.3 to 506.0)358.0 (280.0 to 436.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Group With Achilles Tendinopathy vs Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy · ANOVA · p = 0.44 (Adjusted for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 73.8
  • Group With Achilles Tendinopathy vs Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy · ANOVA · p = 0.08 (P-value adjusted for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 31.7
PrimaryPain Psychology

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK, score range 17 to 68). A decrease in TSK would indicate a decrease in fear of injury (and/or re-injury)

Time frame:
Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Pain Psychology
units on a scaleGroup With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles Tendinopathy
Before Anesthetic Injection37.2 (34.7 to 39.7)29.6 (27.1 to 32.1)
After Anesthetic Injection34.9 (32.5 to 37.3)28.7 (26.2 to 31.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Group With Achilles Tendinopathy vs Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy · ANOVA · p = <0.001 (P-value adjusted for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 6.9
  • Group With Achilles Tendinopathy vs Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy · ANOVA · p = 0.012 (P-value adjusted for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 1.6
PrimaryMovement System

Change in peak ankle power during the stance phase of gait during stair ascent, which will be assessed by syncing movement data from 3-dimensional motion analysis with ground reaction force data from a force plate. Peak positive ankle power reflects the ability of the plantar flexor muscles to concentrically generate speed and force at the ankle joint.

Time frame:
Within session, baseline and 30 minutes after an anesthetic injection
Reported as:
Mean · Watts/kg
Movement System
Watts/kgGroup With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles Tendinopathy
Before Anesthetic Injection2.7 (2.3 to 3.0)3.0 (2.6 to 3.3)
After Anesthetic Injection2.8 (2.4 to 3.2)2.8 (2.4 to 3.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Group With Achilles Tendinopathy vs Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy · ANOVA · p = 1.0 (P-value adjusted for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 0.15
  • Group With Achilles Tendinopathy vs Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy · ANOVA · p = 1.0 (P-value adjusted for multiple comparisons) · Mean difference (final values): 0.05

Adverse events

Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group With Achilles Tendinopathy0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)2/23 (8.7%)
Group Without Achilles Tendinopathy0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)0/23 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventGroup With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles Tendinopathy
Increased sorenessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/230/23

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Group With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles TendinopathyTotal
Mean49.5 ± 10.349.2 ± 10.649.4 ± 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles TendinopathyTotal
Female151530
Male8816
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles TendinopathyTotal
Hispanic or Latino202
Not Hispanic or Latino212142
Unknown or Not Reported022
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles TendinopathyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native202
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander044
Black or African American213
White191837
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Group With Achilles TendinopathyGroup Without Achilles TendinopathyTotal
United States232346
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03316378
Lead sponsor
Ruth Chimenti
Responsible party
Ruth Chimenti (Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Iowa) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Jan 28, 2016
Primary completion
May 10, 2018
Completion
May 10, 2018
Results posted
Jul 5, 2019
Last update
Jul 5, 2019

Study contacts

Ruth L Chimenti, DPT, PhD
principal investigator · University of Iowa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ropivacaine

Start the discussion