ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03316014Pediatry ADRUpdated Oct 20, 2017

Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatrics: Experience of a Regional Pharmacovigilance Center

An observational study in Child With Adverse Drug Reactions, sponsored by CHU de Reims. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-20.

Sponsored by CHU de Reims · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
632
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim. - To describe the adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the drugs involved in pediatrics.

Methods. - An observational study on all ADR notifications recorded in the French pharmaco-vigilance database by the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2014 involving children from 0 to 17 years inclusive was performed. For all notifications, we studied the patient and the ADR characteristics

Read the detailed description

Pediatry aged under 18 years accounted for around 22% of the French general population.

Data regarding drug safety from clinical trials are insufficient in this population.

Aim. - To describe the adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the drugs involved in pediatrics.

Methods. - An observational study on all ADR notifications recorded in the French pharmaco-vigilance database by the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2014 involving children from 0 to 17 years inclusive was performed. For all notifications, we studied the patient and the ADR characteristics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Child With Adverse Drug Reactions

Keywords

  • Pediatry; Adverse drug reactions; Pharmacovigilance
03

In context

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

449 studies on the registry are indexed under Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 632 is above the median of 414 across 162 observational studies indexed under Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions.

Browse Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions studies →

Lead sponsor

CHU de Reims is the lead sponsor of 276 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children from 0 to 17 years inclusive who presented an adverse drug reaction notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children from 0 to 17 years inclusive
  • Who presented an adverse drug reaction notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne

Exclusion criteria

exclusion criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
632 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Adverse drug reaction

    Children from 0 to 17 years inclusive with ADR notifications recorded in the French pharmaco-vigilance database by the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2014

    Other: Adverse drug reaction

Interventions

  • OtherAdverse drug reaction

    description of the adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the drugs involved in pediatrics

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the different type of ADR

    Time frame: 30 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Saint-Martin C, Kanagaratnam L, de Boissieu P, Azzouz B, Abou Taam M, Trenque T. [Adverse drug reactions in pediatrics: Experience of a regional pharmacovigilance center]. Therapie. 2016 Oct;71(5):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 11. French. PubMed 27203165 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 1985 to primary completion in Dec 2014, 359 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 17, 2017
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
StartActual
Jan 1985
Primary completionActual
Dec 2014
CompletionActual
Dec 2014
Last update
Oct 20, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03316014
Lead sponsor
CHU de Reims
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Jan 1985
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Last update
Oct 20, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion