ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03315845Updated Oct 24, 2017

Neuraxial Anaesthesia: Does BMI Relate to Ease of Neuraxial Anaesthesia?

An observational study in Obesity, Neuraxial Ultrasound and Obstetric Anaesthesia, sponsored by National Maternity Hospital, Ireland. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-24.

Sponsored by National Maternity Hospital, Ireland · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Neuraxial anaesthesia can be more difficult and associated with more complications if the patient's bony landmarks are difficult to palpate. They are more likely to be difficult to palpate if a patient has a high Body Mass Index (BMI), (>30kg/m2). The depth that the spinal or epidural needle must be inserted is usually longer in these patients with high BMIs. We wish to palpate the backs of at least 100 such patients to see how many of them have impalpable bony landmarks. We then wish to use ultrasound to measure the distance from skin to the posterior epidural complex to discover if this length is longer than the standard needle length. If it is longer in the majority of people we study, we will recommend changing standard practice to start using a longer needle for all first attempts at neuraxial anaesthesia in this patient population.

Read the detailed description

Complications rates including failure are higher in obese patients undergoing anaesthesia procedures. Anaesthetists have adopted the use of ultrasound to assist in overcoming these difficulties. Neuraxial ultrasound is proving to be beneficial in those patients in whom identification of interspinous spaces is difficult and most of these patients are obese.

In our institution, there is a 'standard practice' for neuraxial procedures, with a 'standard' needle used for first attempts (Whitacre 25G 90mm for spinal, Tuohy 18G 80mm for epidural). If the operator has not reached the desired space (spinal or epidural) with the needle inserted to 8cm, a longer needle is then considered for further attempts. This exposes the patient to at least one extra neuraxial needle insertion. Studies have shown that increased needle insertions and redirections are associated with increased complications.

We hypothesised that a large number of patients with BMI>30kg/m2 would have a depth of spinal/epidural space that is greater than the length of the 'standard' needle used. Therefore we suggest that practice should change to use the longer needle or a combined spinal-epidural on the first attempt in these patients.

To test our hypothesis, we will assess the ease of palpation of the following anatomical landmarks: anterior and posterior iliac crests; lumbar spinous processes; scapulae; and sacral cornua. We will then perform neuraxial sonography of the lumbar spine, measuring depth to epidural space. Finally we will measure waist circumference in those patients with BMI \<30kg/m2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Neuraxial Ultrasound
  • Obstetric Anaesthesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • BMI
  • obstetric anaesthesia
  • neuraxial anaesthesia
  • neuraxial ultrasound
  • difficult neuraxial anaesthesia
03

In context

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 114 across 2,154 observational studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

National Maternity Hospital, Ireland is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Obstetric patients with BMI >30kg/m2, presenting in a non-emergency situation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recorded >30kg/m2; ability to give consent; non-emergency cases.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous metal work to lumbar spine.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherPalpation of bony landmarks for neuraxial anaesthesia.

    Manual palpation of anterior and posterior iliac crests; lumbar spinous processes; scapulae; and sacral cornua. Ultrasound of neuraxial anatomy to assess depth to epidural space.

    Also known as: Neuraxial ultrasound

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Palpability of bony landmarks for neuraxial anaesthesia

    The percentage of patients with BMI\>30kg/m2 who have difficult or impalpable bony landmarks including: lumbar spinous processes; anterior and posterior iliac spines; scapulae; and sacral cornua.

    Time frame: 4 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ultrasonographic distance from skin to posterior epidural complex

    To use sonography to measure the distance from skin to the dural complex in these patients and quantify the percentage whose distance is greater than the length of the standard needle.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arzola C, Mikhael R, Margarido C, Carvalho JC. Spinal ultrasound versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in labour: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):499-505. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000119. PubMed 25036283 ↗
  • Ansari T, Yousef A, El Gamassy A, Fayez M. Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics: is there an advantage over the landmark technique in patients with easily palpable spines? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Aug;23(3):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12. PubMed 24768303 ↗
  • Srinivasan KK, Lee PJ, Iohom G. Ultrasound for neuraxial blockade. Med Ultrason. 2014 Dec;16(4):356-63. PubMed 25463890 ↗
  • Grau T, Leipold RW, Delorme S, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging of the thoracic epidural space. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):200-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.29239. PubMed 11915069 ↗
  • Carnie J, Boden J, Gao Smith F. Prediction by computerised tomography of distance from skin to epidural space during thoracic epidural insertion. Anaesthesia. 2002 Jul;57(7):701-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02572_4.x. PubMed 12059829 ↗
  • Gnaho A, Nguyen V, Villevielle T, Frota M, Marret E, Gentili ME. Assessing the depth of the subarachnoid space by ultrasound. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;62(4):520-30. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70150-2. PubMed 22793967 ↗
  • Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The Accuracy of a Handheld Ultrasound Device for Neuraxial Depth and Landmark Assessment: A Prospective Cohort Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1995-1998. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002407. PubMed 28858898 ↗
  • Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1876-81. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a323f6. PubMed 19448216 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03315845
Lead sponsor
National Maternity Hospital, Ireland
Responsible party
Moninne Creaney (Dr. Moninne Creaney, Specialist Registrar in Anaesthesia, National Maternity Hospital, Ireland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 20, 2017
Start date
Oct 23, 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 9, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 9, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 24, 2017

Study contacts

Moninne Creaney, MBBChBAOFCAI
Contact
creaneym@hotmail.com
00353879837656
Kevin McKeating
study director · National Maternity Hospital, Ireland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion