An interventional study of Schroth SSE with Bracing and Bracing alone in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Status unknown at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-06.
Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of Schroth scoliosis-specific exercises (SSE) on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) during bracing. The goal is to determine if Schroth SSE combined with bracing can is superior in controlling curve progression when compared with bracing alone. Curve progression is defined as worsening of coronal Cobb angle of 6 degrees or more.
Adolescent Idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine, characterized by a lateral curvature and vertebral rotation. Its prevalence is estimated to be 2.5% in children between aged 10 and 16 in Hong Kong. Curve progression occurs during pubertal growth spurt. If the primary curve does not exceed 40 degree at skeletal maturity, it is unlikely to continue to progress, and there are little or no long-term clinical consequences. However, if the curve progresses beyond 50 degree during adolescence, it may cause functional limitation, accelerated disc degeneration with potential neurological deficit, cosmetic concerns, decreased quality of life, and possible progression in adulthood. Thus, surgical correction of the deformity with instrumented spinal fusion is usually recommended if the curve reaches 50 degree during adolescence.
Currently, spinal bracing is the only the only non-operative treatment supported with high-quality evidence that can prevent curve progression. In a randomized controlled trial, Weinstein et al. recently reported in the New England Journal of Medicine that bracing was effective in preventing curve progression to threshold for surgery in 72% of cases. The trial was terminated early due to the treatment benefit in favor of bracing. Nonetheless, the authors reported a treatment failure rate of 25% in the randomized cohort, which was similar to previous published studies. Hence, despite the best available non-operative treatment, the number of adolescents ultimately requiring surgery remains substantial. Surgery is associated with medical comorbidities, can cause psychosocial stress to the children and their families, and has significant financial impact on healthcare, with the total costs of spinal surgery to correct AIS ranked second only to appendicitis among children 10 to 17 years of age. Consequently, further effective strategies to prevent scoliosis progression in children are needed.
Scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE) has been proposed as an additional non-operative intervention that may reduce curve progression during the adolescent growth spurt. However, the standard of care for non-operative treatment of AIS varies widely between North America and Europe, and the use of SSE is not universally accepted. SSE is a potentially low-cost intervention that will be of substantial benefit even if a relative risk reduction in curve progression or reaching the threshold for surgery is reduced in a modest proportion of those participating.
SSE, as opposed to generalized physiotherapy, consists of individually-adapted exercises that aim to promote spinal realignment through self-correction and stabilization, as well as modulating patterns of trunk muscles recruitment. Electromyography (EMG) of paraspinal and abdominal muscles in AIS patients revealed disrupted patterns of muscles recruitment, which are associated with a disparity in trunk isometric rotation strength between sides. AIS patients demonstrate proprioceptive and balance control problems, along with a distorted body schema, resulting in a mismatch between the actual spinal alignment and the patients' internal representation of the body. SSE aims to reverse the anomalous patterns of muscle recruitment through training, and modify the body schema with visual and somatosensory feedback. This forms the theoretical neurophysiological basis for using this treatment strategy for AIS.
Schroth SSE is one of the most studied and widely-used schools of SSE. It is a technique tailored to the type of scoliosis and the curve magnitude of each patient. It is based on vertebrae deflections and sagittal corrections that result in horizontal vertebrae de-rotation. It uses rotational breathing and postural auto-correction to reverse the underlying impairments in spinal muscle function, postural control and proprioception which contribute to the development of curvature in AIS. Patients will also be given cognitive behavioral strategies to empower them to self-manage their conditions.
The University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,286 studies on the registry; 343 are open to participants now.
Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in this group will be prescribed an outpatient-based Schroth exercise program, as per our preliminary study. It consists of an individualised eight-week outpatient program that includes four initial private training sessions, once every two weeks, where exercises will be taught to the patient and their caregivers. A home exercise program will be instituted thereafter and patients will be required to return for supervised sessions once every two months.
Combination Product: Schroth SSE with Bracing
Patients in the control group will receive standard level of care for bracing, which consists of education on general exercises for spinal movement, strengthening, and balancing. These patients will only attend study assessments with no extra physiotherapy sessions.
Device: Bracing alone
Patients in this group will be prescribed an outpatient-based Schroth exercise program, as per our preliminary study. It consists of an individualised eight-week outpatient program that includes four initial private training sessions, once every two weeks, where exercises will be taught to the patient and their caregivers. A home exercise program will be instituted thereafter and patients will be required to return for supervised sessions once every two months.
Patients in the control group will receive standard level of care for bracing, which consists of education on general exercises for spinal movement, strengthening, and balancing. These patients will only attend study assessments with no extra physiotherapy sessions.
Effect of Schroth SSE during bracing versus bracing alone in AIS patients as determined by the difference in coronal Cobb angle pre- and one year post-treatment
1\. To evaluate the effect of Schroth SSE during bracing versus bracing alone in AIS patients as determined by the difference in coronal Cobb angle pre- and one year post-treatment
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Compare changes in sagittal plane radiological parameter between Schroth SSE with bracing and bracing alone by EOS Imaging System
To evaluate the effect of Schroth SSE during bracing compared with bracing alone on sagittal plane radiological parameter using EOS Imaging System
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Compare changes in transverse plane radiological parameter between Schroth SSE with bracing and bracing alone by EOS Imaging System
To evaluate the effect of Schroth SSE during bracing compared with bracing alone on transverse plane radiological parameter using EOS Imaging System
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Compare changes in surface topography between Schroth SSE with bracing and bracing alone using Bunnell's scoliometer
To evaluate the effect of Schroth SSE during bracing compared with bracing alone on surface topography using Bunnell's scoliometer
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Compare changes in surface topography between Schroth SSE with bracing and bracing alone using clinical photography
To evaluate the effect of Schroth SSE during bracing compared with bracing alone on surface topography using clinical photography
Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Compare changes in surface topography between Schroth SSE with bracing and bracing alone using VITUS Smart XXL 3D body scanner system
To evaluate the effect of Schroth SSE during bracing compared with bracing alone on surface topography using VITUS Smart XXL 3D body scanner system
Time frame: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Measure quality of life between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by SRS-7 questionaire
To measure quality of life between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by SRS-7 questionaire
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Measure health outcomes between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by EQ-5D-5L
To measure health outcomes between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Measure patients' perception of their appearance between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS)
To measure patients' perception of their appearance between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by Trunk Appearance Perception Scale (TAPS)
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Measure levels of pain between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by Numeric Pain Ratings
To measure levels of pain between Schroth SSE with underarm brace and underarm brace alone by Numeric Pain Ratings
Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, until skeletal maturity
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.