ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03305146CYST-GENUpdated Apr 14, 2022

Feasibility of Molecular Biology in Pancreatic Cyst Tumors

An interventional study of Molecular biology analysis of pancreatic intra-cyst fluid in Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreas Cyst and Serous Cystadenoma, sponsored by Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France. Active, not recruiting at 11 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-14.

Sponsored by Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2017, registered Jun 2017).

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
93
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of the study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of intra-cystic fluid DNA molecular analysis to standard diagnostics.

The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of intra-cystic fluid DNA molecular analysis.

Read the detailed description

Multicenter study to determinate the feasibility of intra-cystic fluid DNA molecular analysis in patients with suspected cystic tumours of pancreas in whom EUS FNA is clinically indicated.

Morphological criteria obtained by MRI and computerised tomography (tumor characterization (size, metastases presence, dilatation of bile ducts), etiologic diagnosis, serious symptoms), biological exams (biomarkers), cytological analysis will lead to a diagnosis and a treatment.

The goal of this study is to compare this standard diagnostic modalities to diagnosis obtained by intra-cystic fluid DNA molecular analysis.

Is the DNA molecular analysis improve the diagnosis accuracy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Cyst
  • Pancreas Cyst
  • Serous Cystadenoma
  • Mucinous Cystadenoma
  • IPMN

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pancreatic Cyst

97 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Cyst; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 93 is above the median of 84 across 38 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Cyst.

Browse Pancreatic Cyst studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient older than 18 years of age, male or female
  • Cystic tumor of the pancreas requiring a puncture under endoscopic control to determine the etiologic diagnosis and gravity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Doubts regarding the etiological diagnosis of the pancreatic cyst
  • for the realization of a high digestive endoscopy
  • Haemorrhagic disorder, haemostasis and coagulation disorder (TP \<60%, TCa> 40 sec and \<60000 / mm3).
  • AVK, AOD and AAP cannot be stopped
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
93 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    single arm

    For inoperable patients with indeterminate cystic lesions of the pancreas,a EUS FNA will be performed and molecular biology analysis of pancreatic intra-cyst fluid collected by EUS FNA will be performed. For operable patients, after the pancreatic surgery, molecular biology analysis of extemporaneous pancreatic tissue specimen biopsy will be conducted.

    Genetic: Molecular biology analysis of pancreatic intra-cyst fluid

Interventions

  • GeneticMolecular biology analysis of pancreatic intra-cyst fluid

    The EUS FNA will be performed according to the Francophone Club of Echo Endoscopy recommendations. For molecular biology technique, the samples will be processed within the UMR_S910 unit. Nucleic acids will be extracted from the intra-cystic fluid or, for post-operative patients, from a resected specimen that will be collected into a tube containing a nucleic acid stabilization solution (Allprotect Tissue reagent, Qiagen). The nucleic acids will be extracted and then sequenced. The sequencing technology chosen (HaloPlexHS, Agilent) allows a detection close to 1% in allelic frequency. This new technical approach that links high sensitivity and specificity is also suitable with degraded and/or low-volume ( \<50ng) DNA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison between gene mutations found into the pancreatic cystic tumor fluid to gene mutations found into tissue specimen

    The nucleic acids of the samples will be extracted and then sequenced on a panel of about 70 genes implicated in the pancreatic tumorigenesis and targeting RAS, MAPK, AKT, JAK-STAT, WNT, TGFB, TP53 and Repair BRCA, ATM. The selected sequencing technology (HaloPlexHS ®, Agilent) will be used. A comparison of the molecular profiles between the cystic fluid and the surgical specimen will be carried out and then confronted with the pathology, biological, radiological and clinical characterization

    Time frame: 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the feasibility of the molecular biology analysis of the pancreatic cystic tumor fluid to distinguish the pancreatic cysts.

    The nucleic acids of the samples will be extracted from the different cyst fluids and then sequenced. A comparison of the molecular profiles between the different cystic fluids will be carried out and then confronted with the pathology, biological, radiological and clinical characterization

    Time frame: up to 6 months

07

Study locations

11 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I. Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;105(9):2079-84. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.122. Epub 2010 Mar 30. PubMed 20354507 ↗
  • Farrell JJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: management and unanswered questions. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(6):1303-15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.073. PubMed 23622140 ↗
  • Terris B, Ponsot P, Paye F, Hammel P, Sauvanet A, Molas G, Bernades P, Belghiti J, Ruszniewski P, Flejou JF. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas confined to secondary ducts show less aggressive pathologic features as compared with those involving the main pancreatic duct. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Oct;24(10):1372-7. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200010000-00006. PubMed 11023098 ↗
  • Crippa S, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Salvia R, Finkelstein D, Bassi C, Dominguez I, Muzikansky A, Thayer SP, Falconi M, Mino-Kenudson M, Capelli P, Lauwers GY, Partelli S, Pederzoli P, Warshaw AL. Mucin-producing neoplasms of the pancreas: an analysis of distinguishing clinical and epidemiologic characteristics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Feb;8(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19835989 ↗
  • Marchegiani G, Mino-Kenudson M, Sahora K, Morales-Oyarvide V, Thayer S, Ferrone C, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-Del Castillo C. IPMN involving the main pancreatic duct: biology, epidemiology, and long-term outcomes following resection. Ann Surg. 2015 May;261(5):976-83. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000813. PubMed 24979607 ↗
  • Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V, Chari S, Falconi M, Jang JY, Kimura W, Levy P, Pitman MB, Schmidt CM, Shimizu M, Wolfgang CL, Yamaguchi K, Yamao K; International Association of Pancreatology. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):183-97. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Apr 16. PubMed 22687371 ↗
  • Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, Centeno BA, Szydlo T, Regan S, del Castillo CF, Warshaw AL. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004 May;126(5):1330-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.013. PubMed 15131794 ↗
  • Serikawa M, Sasaki T, Fujimoto Y, Kuwahara K, Chayama K. Management of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: treatment strategy based on morphologic classification. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;40(9):856-62. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225609.63975.6f. PubMed 17016145 ↗
  • Bournet B, Kirzin S, Carrere N, Portier G, Otal P, Selves J, Musso C, Suc B, Moreau J, Fourtanier G, Pradere B, Lazorthes F, Escourrou J, Buscail L. Clinical fate of branch duct and mixed forms of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the pancreas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jul;24(7):1211-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05826.x. Epub 2009 May 19. PubMed 19476563 ↗
  • Sugiyama M, Izumisato Y, Abe N, Masaki T, Mori T, Atomi Y. Predictive factors for malignancy in intraductal papillary-mucinous tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1244-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4265. PubMed 14515294 ↗
  • Kanno A, Satoh K, Hirota M, Hamada S, Umino J, Itoh H, Masamune A, Asakura T, Shimosegawa T. Prediction of invasive carcinoma in branch type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;45(9):952-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0238-0. Epub 2010 Apr 10. PubMed 20383536 ↗
  • Crippa S, Salvia R, Warshaw AL, Dominguez I, Bassi C, Falconi M, Thayer SP, Zamboni G, Lauwers GY, Mino-Kenudson M, Capelli P, Pederzoli P, Castillo CF. Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas is not an aggressive entity: lessons from 163 resected patients. Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):571-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31811f4449. PubMed 18362619 ↗
  • Cizginer S, Turner BG, Bilge AR, Karaca C, Pitman MB, Brugge WR. Cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen is an accurate diagnostic marker of pancreatic mucinous cysts. Pancreas. 2011 Oct;40(7):1024-8. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31821bd62f. Erratum In: Pancreas. 2013 May;42(4):728. Turner, Brian [corrected to Turner, Brian G]. PubMed 21775920 ↗
  • Sahora K, Mino-Kenudson M, Brugge W, Thayer SP, Ferrone CR, Sahani D, Pitman MB, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-del Castillo CF. Branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: does cyst size change the tip of the scale? A critical analysis of the revised international consensus guidelines in a large single-institutional series. Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):466-75. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a18f48. PubMed 24022439 ↗
  • Wu BU, Sampath K, Berberian CE, Kwok KK, Lim BS, Kao KT, Giap AQ, Kosco AE, Akmal YM, Difronzo AL, Yu W, Ngor EW. Prediction of malignancy in cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: a population-based cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan;109(1):121-9; quiz 130. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.334. Epub 2013 Oct 1. PubMed 24080609 ↗
  • Grobmyer SR, Cance WG, Copeland EM, Vogel SB, Hochwald SN. Is there an indication for initial conservative management of pancreatic cystic lesions? J Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;100(5):372-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.21260. PubMed 19267387 ↗
  • Huang ES, Turner BG, Fernandez-Del-Castillo C, Brugge WR, Hur C. Pancreatic cystic lesions: clinical predictors of malignancy in patients undergoing surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15;31(2):285-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04173.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21. PubMed 19845568 ↗
  • Crippa S, Bassi C, Salvia R, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Rebours V, Levy P, Partelli S, Suleiman SL, Banks PA, Ahmed N, Chari ST, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Falconi M. Low progression of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with worrisome features and high-risk stigmata undergoing non-operative management: a mid-term follow-up analysis. Gut. 2017 Mar;66(3):495-506. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310162. Epub 2016 Jan 7. PubMed 26743012 ↗
  • Springer S, Wang Y, Dal Molin M, Masica DL, Jiao Y, Kinde I, Blackford A, Raman SP, Wolfgang CL, Tomita T, Niknafs N, Douville C, Ptak J, Dobbyn L, Allen PJ, Klimstra DS, Schattner MA, Schmidt CM, Yip-Schneider M, Cummings OW, Brand RE, Zeh HJ, Singhi AD, Scarpa A, Salvia R, Malleo G, Zamboni G, Falconi M, Jang JY, Kim SW, Kwon W, Hong SM, Song KB, Kim SC, Swan N, Murphy J, Geoghegan J, Brugge W, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Mino-Kenudson M, Schulick R, Edil BH, Adsay V, Paulino J, van Hooft J, Yachida S, Nara S, Hiraoka N, Yamao K, Hijioka S, van der Merwe S, Goggins M, Canto MI, Ahuja N, Hirose K, Makary M, Weiss MJ, Cameron J, Pittman M, Eshleman JR, Diaz LA Jr, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Karchin R, Hruban RH, Vogelstein B, Lennon AM. A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1501-10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Aug 4. PubMed 26253305 ↗
  • Al-Haddad MA, Kowalski T, Siddiqui A, Mertz HR, Mallat D, Haddad N, Malhotra N, Sadowski B, Lybik MJ, Patel SN, Okoh E, Rosenkranz L, Karasik M, Golioto M, Linder J, Catalano MF. Integrated molecular pathology accurately determines the malignant potential of pancreatic cysts. Endoscopy. 2015 Feb;47(2):136-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390742. Epub 2014 Oct 14. PubMed 25314329 ↗
  • Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, Raimondo M. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):204-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995336. Epub 2007 Dec 4. PubMed 18058615 ↗
  • Boustiere C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G, Bulois P, Deprez P, Laquiere A, Laugier R, Lesur G, Mosler P, Nalet B, Napoleon B, Rembacken B, Ajzenberg N, Collet JP, Baron T, Dumonceau JM; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011 May;43(5):445-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256317. Epub 2011 May 4. PubMed 21547880 ↗
  • Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Frossard JL, Heresbach D, Pujol B, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Gines A; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):897-912. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256754. Epub 2011 Aug 12. PubMed 21842456 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2017, 11 months.

Of 17 interventional studies with no phase under Pancreatic Cyst, half reached primary completion within 58 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 64. This study's 11 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2017
First posted
Oct 9, 2017
StartActual
Jan 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 2017
CompletionEst.
Jan 2027
Last update
Apr 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03305146
Lead sponsor
Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France
Collaborators
Ramsay Générale de Santé
Responsible party
Arthur Laquiere (Principal Investigator Dr Arthur LAQUIERE, Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2017
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Dec 2017
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2022

Study contacts

Arthur Laquière, MD
principal investigator · French Society of Digestive Endoscopy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion