ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03301753(MILK)Updated Sep 8, 2026

Maternal Obesity, Breast Milk Composition, and Infant Growth

An observational study in Obesity, Pregnancy and Breastmilk Collection, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Active, not recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,050
Ages
0 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Today the majority of pregnant women in the United States are either overweight or obese at conception with their offspring having greater adiposity at birth, a 2-fold greater risk of later obesity, and neonatal insulin resistance. It was long thought that breast milk composition was fairly uniform among women, having been optimized through evolutionary time to provide adequate sole nutrition for the growing infant regardless of the environmental circumstances. However, recent evidence shows that breast milk is a highly complex fluid with significant inter-individual variation in hormonal and cytokine concentrations, human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) and other features. Pervasive maternal obesity and gestational diabetes are evolutionarily novel conditions for the human species but little effort has yet been made to systematically examine how they are associated with breast milk adipose-tissue derived hormone and cytokine (adipocytokine) variation, HMOs, or other features, or whether that variation relates to infant metabolic status. The objective of this study is to comprehensively assess the "lactational programming" hypothesis, that is, whether or not recently documented variation in breast-milk composition is related to both maternal and infant metabolic status. The central hypothesis is that a graded, dose-response relationship between maternal adiposity and GDM exists with adipocytokine concentrations, HMOs, and other features in breast milk and that the milk concentrations of these features are associated with altered body composition in their exclusively breast-fed offspring. The results of the study will be used to design interventions to reduce maternal weight during pregnancy and lactation and to augment lactation education materials to focus on the needs of breastfeeding women with obesity and GDM.

Read the detailed description

General Study Design A prospective observational pregnancy cohort of 600 women who exclusively breastfeed their infants to at least 1 month post-partum, will be recruited in the second trimester of pregnancy, across a wide range of maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, with equal numbers of normal weight, overweight, and obese women, and with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitis. The women will be recruited at two study centers (University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in Oklahoma City, OK and Health Partners Research Foundation in Saint Paul/Minneapolis, MN), with maternal and infant diet, body composition and metabolic health followed prospectively at 1, 3 and 6-months post-partum in Specific Aims 1 and 2. In Specific Aim 3, a subset of 60 of these mother/infant dyads "Mothers in Focus" (30 OB and 30 NW mothers) will be recruited for additional biospecimen collection, including milk samples at 2 and 6-months, maternal body composition changes using DXA, infant DXA, metabolomic comparison of serial milk samples, and follow-up to 12 rather than 6-months.

Data Collection Elements:

Maternal Adiposity. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI status (NW, OW, OB) is the primary exposure used to power the study. Pre-pregnancy BMI will be determined using first (baseline) clinic weights from the electronic medical records (EMR) (no more than 90 d. after last menstrual period), and stature measured by research staff at the mother's first visit to our research centers. BMI will be categorized as underweight (BMI \<18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5 - \<25), overweight (BMI 25 - \<30) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2).

Gestational weight gain (GWG) and postpartum weight loss/retention:Total GWG will be calculated as the difference between delivery weight and baseline weight (as documented above). If weight at delivery is not available, the last prenatal weight in the EMR, ≤14 days from birth, will be used. Trimester specific GWG will be calculated from the EMR. GWG will be used as a continuous and as a categorical exposure (excessive, appropriate, and insufficient, according to the IOM 2009 guidelines. Early PP weight loss (from delivery to 1-month postpartum), and later PP weight loss from 1-month to 3-months PP will be calculated. Concurrent changes in maternal weight and milk adipocytokine levels from 0 - 1 month and 1 - 3 months will be examined, hypothesizing that greater PP weight loss (lower weight retention) is associated with lower levels of milk adipocytokines. Gestational diabetes will be examined as a predictor of milk composition variation.

Milk Collection: Changes in milk composition will be assessed from 1 to 3 months. Definition of exclusive breast feeding: Study staff will confirm that all infants have been exclusively breast milk fed (i.e. no formula, no liquid other than water and no solids) at least 14 days prior to the 1-month visit and plan to continue exclusively breastfeed to 3 months. Exclusive breast milk feeding will include any combination of expressed breast milk and breast milk fed via the breast.

Breast Milk Collection Protocol: Mother and child will report to the study site at 1 and 3-months (± 5 days) postpartum, between 8:00-10:00 am, at least 1½ hours since the last feeding and while the mother has fasted at least 1 hour. A pre-feeding infant weight will be obtained using a high sensitivity scale, the mother will be encouraged to feed the child ad libitum from both breasts until volitionally satisfied, and a postfeeding infant weight will be obtained (difference = milk output). Questionnaire information, maternal anthropometry, and infant body composition data will be collected, and 2 hours later, the mother will provide a single breast expression sample using an electric breast pump (Medela, Inc., provided by the study team). Breast milk will be mixed, aliquoted and stored at -80°C.

Milk Adipocytokine Assays: Milk samples will be thawed in the refrigerator and vortexed. Milk fat will be separated from the aqueous phase by centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The resulting skimmed milk will be assayed using commercially available immunoassay kits for insulin, IGF-1/BP, high molecular weight adiponectin, visfatin, leptin, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α. Glucose will be measured by the glucose oxidase method. To examine additional cytokine and growth factor concentrations (e.g., interleukins, interferons, TGF- β) in a manner that conserves sample, a multiplex assay (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) and the Luminex 200 Multiplex analyzer will be employed.

Data Analysis for Specific Aim 1: For each of the milk adipocytokines (continuous dependent variables), separate mixed effects regression models (to account for serial milk data) will be constructed, first testing crude associations of milk IL-6 at both 1 and 3-months with each maternal adiposity variable (excessive GWG, pre-pregnancy BMI status, total GWG, trimester-specific GWG, early and later PP weight loss), and then minimally adjusted models (also adjusting for infant sex and gestational age, study center (OK or MN), maternal age, parity, ethnicity, and maternal socioeconomic status) and finally fully-adjusted regression models including those variables determined to be potential confounders. In secondary analyses, possible effect modification of the maternal adiposity associations will be assessed by adding interaction terms. If the interaction term is significant, a stratified analyses will be conducted.

Data Collection for Specific Aim 2 Infant Body Composition. Total body composition will be measured using air displacement plethysmography (ADP) i.e. Pea Pod (v 3.1.1), a rapid, valid, highly reliable (% fat CV%\< 2.5% in our hands) method of total body volume estimation from which total body fat (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) is determined using prediction equations. Both the University of Minnesota and the University of Oklahoma have the same ADP (same manufacturer, model and software versions).

Infant insulin secretion and resistance at 6 months: C-peptide, or connecting peptide, as a marker of insulin secretion will be collected. Serum C-peptide is secreted in equimolar amounts by the pancreas as insulin, but is a more stable measure because it is not prone to degradation following hemolysis. C-peptide was used as a marker of fetal beta cell function in the HAPO (Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Out-come) study to assess the effects of maternal obesity and gestational diabetes on adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes. Insulin resistance will be estimated using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Blood will be obtained via heel-stick in the infant at the time of the 6 month visit to the study center, as is routine in our laboratories, which yields \~ 1.0 cc of blood. Whole blood will be kept on ice until centrifugation in our laboratories, and 0.5 mL of serum aliquoted at stored at -80 C until shipped to Dr. Fields' laboratory for analysis using ELISA (Millipore, Billerica, MA; Intra-assay CV = 5%; Inter-assay CV = 6%). Interpretation of C-peptide requires blood glucose level which will be measured in the same blood sample using the glucose oxidase method.

Milk Macronutrient Content: Total fat content will be measured by the Mojonnier method Fatty acid composition will be assessed by gas chromatography using the International Dairy Federation (IDF) methods. Other standard methods will quantitate total nitrogen, ash, moisture, and carbohydrates.

Infant Appetite, Satiety, and Diet: Shortened versions of the infant diet questionnaires used in the Infant Feeding Practices Study II at 1 month, 3-months, and 6-months will assess maternal report of infant dietary intake. Maternal perception of infant appetite will be measured using the Baby Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Infant Sleep: The Sadeh Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire has been validated against actigraphy and will be used to assess sleeping behavior at each visit. Additional Potential Confounders: See Specific Aim 1.

Data Analysis(Specific Aim 2) Statistical Analysis: The over-arching primary hypothesis is that milk adipocytokine concentrations will be associated with altered body composition from ages 1 to 6-months, and with elevated C-peptide or HOMA-IR at 6 months, independent of potential confounders. Example Hypothesis 2.a1: Higher levels of the appetite suppressing hormone leptin at 1 and/or 3-months will be associated with lower infant weight gain, reflecting specifically lower FFM gain from 1 - 6 months. We will use mixed effects linear and logistic regression as the primary analysis approach to address this and related hypotheses. Growth and body composition data will be serial (0 [for weight], 1, 3, and 6-months), which will be examined using mixed effects models which models the covariance structure of the repeated measures within subject and allows for subject-specific intercept and slopes to be modeled. Milk adipocytokines are the independent variables of interest. Because their individual relationships to infant growth and other outcomes may not be linear, quintiles or quartiles of milk adipocytokines as well as continuously distributed variables will be examined. Multiple milk adipocytokines will be included simultaneously in final models, to test their independent effects on infant outcomes and to assess their aggregate effects (variance explained).

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastmilk Collection
  • Infant Overnutrition
  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
03

In context

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,050 is above the median of 114 across 2,154 observational studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,216 studies on the registry; 197 are open to participants now.

Of its 136 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 95 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

(Minneapolis site): In the Twin Cities metro area, subjects will be recruited from patients who attend medical group clinics for Ob/Gyn care in their second trimester of pregnancy through the various means, including through the OB/GYN department of the University of Minneosta Medical School via letter and follow-up phone call for final screening.

(Oklahoma City site): Recruitment in the OKC metro area will be through OUHSC Ob/Gyn clinic, and local private practice OB/GYN clinics during the second trimester, through the La Leche League, and public announcements.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant females
  • 21 to 45 years of age at the time of delivery
  • Pre-gravid between 18.5 to 40 kg/m2
  • Healthy pregnancy defined as \<3 days in hospital following delivery
  • Report during enrollment procedures that they have social support for and intention to exclusively breastfeed for at least 3-months
  • If parity >1, report that they successfully breast fed a previous pregnancy for at least 3 months
  • Singleton gestation
  • Term pregnancy (gestational age >37 but \<42 weeks)
  • Infant birth weight >2,500 grams but \<4,500 grams.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alcohol consumption >1 drink per week during pregnancy/lactation
  • Tobacco consumption during pregnancy/lactation
  • History/current Type I or II diabetes
  • Inability to speak/understand English
  • Known congenital metabolic, endocrine disease, or congenital illness affecting infant feeding/growth
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,050 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Milk Composition Changes

    Breastmilk hormone concentration changes

    Time frame: 1-3 months post-partum

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infant Body Composition Changes

    Percent Fat Changes

    Time frame: 0-6 months of age

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Minnesota School of Public Health
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, United States
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Furst AJ, Johnson KE, Nagel EM, Yerabandi N, Kats AM, Gallagher TT, Gale CA, Palmsten K, Pierce S, Hoffman S, Jacobs K, Fields DA, Isganaitis EM, Bode L, Demerath EW. Gestational diabetes, human milk oligosaccharide concentrations, and their links to infant weight gain and the gut microbiome in a United States observational cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2026 Apr;123(4):101235. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2026.101235. Epub 2026 Feb 10. PubMed 41672407 ↗
  • Johnson KE, Heisel T, Allert M, Furst A, Yerabandi N, Knights D, Jacobs KM, Lock EF, Bode L, Fields DA, Rudolph MC, Gale CA, Albert FW, Demerath EW, Blekhman R. Human milk variation is shaped by maternal genetics and impacts the infant gut microbiome. Cell Genom. 2024 Oct 9;4(10):100638. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100638. Epub 2024 Sep 11. PubMed 39265573 ↗
  • Sadr Dadres G, Whitaker KM, Haapala JL, Foster L, Smith KD, Teague AM, Jacobs DR Jr, Kharbanda EO, McGovern PM, Schoenfuss TC, Le LJ, Harnack L, Fields DA, Demerath EW. Relationship of Maternal Weight Status Before, During, and After Pregnancy with Breast Milk Hormone Concentrations. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Apr;27(4):621-628. doi: 10.1002/oby.22409. PubMed 30900412 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — As required by the NICHD, we will upload our clinical subject data and non-genomic milk specimen analyses to the NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). Data submitted to NICHD DASH will be individual-level research data that has been de-identified and is usable for secondary analysis. This will include maternal and infant demographics, diet intake data, clinical status information, body weight and growth data, body composition data, infant feeding and breastfeeding data, maternal physical activity and behavioral data, milk compositional data, and infant fecal microbiome data. All research data submitted to NICHD DASH will be accompanied by proper documentation including study protocol, data collection instruments, data dictionaries, and data de-identification methodology.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Within 6 months of funding end date

Access criteria: Anyone who has access to the NIH/NICHD Data and Specimen Sharing Hub (DASH) will be able to access the IPD

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2014 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2030, 197 months after the start.

Of 791 non-industry observational studies under Obesity, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 106. This study's planned 197 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 836 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 96.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2017
First posted
Oct 4, 2017
StartActual
Jul 1, 2014
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2031
Last update
Sep 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03301753
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

David Fields, PhD
principal investigator · University of Oklahoma
Ellen Demerath, PhD
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion