An interventional study of Pursed lip breathing ventilation and Standard non-invasive ventilation in COPD, sponsored by Research Center Borstel. Suspended at 5 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-12.
Sponsored by Research Center Borstel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Comparison of a conventional non-invasive ventilation to a non-invasive pursed-lip breathing ventilation (PLBV) ventilation in advanced COPD
Intervention:
Non-invasive ventilation with dynamic positive pressure during expiration (pursed-lip breathing ventilation, PLBV) Control Conventional bi-level non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with static positive pressures Duration of intervention per patient 3 months as randomized (1:1) followed by 9 months as chosen by patient
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-invasive ventilation with pursed lip breathing ventilation device
Device: Pursed lip breathing ventilation
Non-invasive ventilation with standard non-invasive ventilation device
Device: Standard non-invasive ventilation
A non-invasive ventilation device mimicking the pursed lip breathing in COPD patients will be used.
Standard non-invasive ventilation
Walking distance in 6-minutes walking test
Time frame: 3 months
Mortality
Time frame: 12 months
Number of hospital admissions
Time frame: 12 months
This study is suspended, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Research Center Borstel