CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03298386TAPAGEUpdated Feb 28, 2025

Elderly Appropriate Treatment in Primary Care (EAT)

An interventional study of Systematic medication review with the STOPP/START tool in Elderly and Polypharmacy, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 75 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-28.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,032
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
75 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The general practitioner (GP) is confronted, for a part of his clientele, with the management of patients suffering from multimorbidity, leading most often to a polypharmacy. It has five major consequences: increasing the number of inappropriate treatments, increasing the risk of potentially dangerous drug interactions, increasing the risk of contraindications associated with several concomitant pathologies, decreasing adherence to treatments by patients and the increased cost of care. Drug misuse in the elderly is particularly common, due to the age-related physiological changes and physiological alterations, with the consequent increase in the risk of adverse events, particularly hospitalizations. Several tools have been proposed to decrease morbimortality in elderly patients with polypharmacy. The studies concluded that the STOPP/START tool was the most structured, sensitive and had the most appropriate use format for clinical practice. However, there are currently no ambulatory studies demonstrating the impact of prescription revision with STOPP/START on the morbimortality of persons aged 75 years and over. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of an intervention targeting GPs to decrease morbimortality in elderly patients with polypharmacy. Volunteer GPs will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or to usual care (control group) and they will be followed one year. The intervention consists in systematic medication review by GP with STOPP/START. In both groups, patient morbimortality will be measured at the end of the study.

Read the detailed description

STOPP/START criteria for potential inappropriate prescribing in older people recognise the dual nature of inappropriate prescribing by including a list of potentially inappropriate medications (STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (START criteria).

02

Conditions studied

  • Elderly
  • Polypharmacy

Keywords

  • Elderly
  • Multimorbidity
  • Polypharmacy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
75 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient 75 years of age or older
  • With polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications)
  • Not institutionalized
  • Patient affiliated with the French health care system
  • Oral consent given to participate in the study
  • Patient who can be followed up 12 months
  • Patient visiting the GP for any reason

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient protected by law (under guardianship or curatorship)
  • Having an estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Participating in a therapeutic trial during the study period
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,032 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Group "STOPP/START"

    Training of General Practitioners with the tool STOPP/START Systematic medication review by GP with STOPP/START

    Other: Systematic medication review with the STOPP/START tool

  • No intervention
    Control group

    Patient's usual care by the general practitioner (who will not be trained in the STOPP/START tool)

Interventions

  • OtherSystematic medication review with the STOPP/START tool

    The STOPP / START tool includes a list of 42 substances / drug classes whose prescription could be discontinued based on specific criteria (81 STOPP criteria: Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and a list of 34 clinical situations involving consideration of the usefulness of a new prescription (START criteria: Screening Tool to Action the Right Treatment).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A composite criterion: - percentage of unplanned hospitalization - percentage of death regardless of cause, - percentage of emergency department visit - percentage of institutionalization

    The primary outcome measure will be a composite criterion comprising unplanned hospitalization, death regardless of cause, emergency department visits and institutionalization after 12 months of follow-up. Unplanned hospitalization is defined as either hospitalization decided after a visit to the emergency department (whether the patient was sent by a doctor or not) or hospitalization decided on the same day by the general practitioner.

    Time frame: at 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of unplanned hospitalization

    Time frame: at 12 months

  2. Percentage of death regardless of cause

    Time frame: at 12 months

  3. Percentage of emergency department visits

    Time frame: at 12 months

  4. Percentage of institutionalization

    Time frame: at 12 months

  5. Percentage of loss of autonomy

    The loss of autonomy at 12 months defined by the loss of at least one activity of the daily living (ADL) between the intervention and 12 months of follow-up.

    Time frame: at 12 months

  6. Decrease in the number of drugs on the prescription (%)

    The decrease in the number of drugs on the prescription (Polypharmacy decrease) between baseline and 12 months of follow-up

    Time frame: at 12 months

  7. Percentage of falls

    Time frame: at 12 months

  8. Percentage of recommendations followed

    Time frame: at 12 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing (CEpiA) EA7376 Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC)
    Créteil, 94010, France
07

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Mahony D, O'Sullivan D, Byrne S, O'Connor MN, Ryan C, Gallagher P. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):213-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu145. Epub 2014 Oct 16. Erratum In: Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):489. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx178. PubMed 25324330 ↗
  • Dalleur O, Spinewine A, Henrard S, Losseau C, Speybroeck N, Boland B. Inappropriate prescribing and related hospital admissions in frail older persons according to the STOPP and START criteria. Drugs Aging. 2012 Oct;29(10):829-37. doi: 10.1007/s40266-012-0016-1. PubMed 23044639 ↗
  • Gallagher PF, O'Connor MN, O'Mahony D. Prevention of potentially inappropriate prescribing for elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial using STOPP/START criteria. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jun;89(6):845-54. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.44. Epub 2011 Apr 20. PubMed 21508941 ↗
  • Dalleur O, Boland B, Losseau C, Henrard S, Wouters D, Speybroeck N, Degryse JM, Spinewine A. Reduction of potentially inappropriate medications using the STOPP criteria in frail older inpatients: a randomised controlled study. Drugs Aging. 2014 Apr;31(4):291-8. doi: 10.1007/s40266-014-0157-5. PubMed 24566877 ↗
  • Frely A, Chazard E, Pansu A, Beuscart JB, Puisieux F. Impact of acute geriatric care in elderly patients according to the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment criteria in northern France. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Feb;16(2):272-8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12474. Epub 2015 Mar 21. PubMed 25809727 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data are available upon reasonable request. Proposals should be directed to ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HOPITAUX DE PARIS \[AP-HP\], Department for Clinical Research, Innovation (DRCI) represented by Mr Milan LAZAREVIC,Director . To gain access, data requestors will will need to sign a data transfer agreement with the sponsor.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03298386
Lead sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Collaborators
CIA : CNGE IRMG Association, CNGE : Collège National des Généralistes Enseignants, RMG : Institut de Recherche en Médecine Générale
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 2, 2017
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2019
Completion
Oct 1, 2019
Last update
Feb 28, 2025

Study contacts

Julien Le Breton
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion