CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03294382Updated Sep 27, 2017

Botulinum Toxin to Improve Results in Epicanthoplasty

A Phase 3 interventional study of Botulinum toxin type A and Placebo in Scar and Intercanthal Distance Ratio, sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-27.

Sponsored by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Medial epicanthal fold is a common skin fold in the inner part of the eye in more than 50% Asia population, giving the illusion of a shorter palpebral fissure length and a wider intercanthal distance. Currently, various epicanthoplasty techniques have been well described to correct epicanthus fold. However, hypertrophic scarring after epicanthoplasty remains a clinical challenge, which seems inevitable and may leading to unpleasing supratarsal crease, recurrence of medial epicanthus fold, even obvious scar formation. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) is widely used for facial rejuvenation and many other medical indications. It is a potent neurotoxin that indirectly blocks neuromuscular transmission and leads to functional denervation of striated muscle for 2 to 6 months after injection. Recently, experimental study and clinical trails have revealed that BTX-A can inhibit the growth of fibroblasts derived from hypertrophic scars and influenced the expression of transforming growth factor-β1. Therefore, we hypothesized that BTX-A can improve hypertrophic scarring after epicanthoplasty through release orbicularis oculi muscle tension, inhibit fibroblast growth, and reduce collagen production. The main aim of this trail is to evaluate the efficiency of BTX-A injection on improving hypertrophic scaring after epicanthoplasty.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scar
  • Intercanthal Distance Ratio

Keywords

  • epicanthoplasty
  • Botulinum Toxins
  • scar
  • intercanthal distance
  • blepharoplasty
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with moderate to severe congenital epicanthus.
  • patients accept Park Z epicanthoplasty.
  • Written informed consent given

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • epicanthus caused by trauma, surgical injury.
  • patients with both epicanthus and blepharopotosis.
  • patients with blepharophimosis-ptosis-epicanthus inversus syndrome, or only inversus epicanthus
  • patients underwent Botulinum Toxin Type A periocular injection within 6 months
  • patients ever have been allergic to Botulinum Toxin Type A or any components of Botulinum Toxin Type A
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Botulinum toxin

    5U Botulinum toxin in 0.1 mL normal saline, administered in one of the intercanthus

    Drug: Botulinum toxin type A

  • Placebo comparator
    Normal Saline

    0.1 mL normal saline, administered in the other intercanthus

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBotulinum toxin type A

    5U botulinum toxin in 0.1 mL normal saline, injected in two points at one side, 2.5U per point, local injection

  • DrugPlacebo

    0.1 mL normal saline, injected in two points at one side, 0.05 mL per point, local injection

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Vancouver Scar scale

    Vancouver scar scale measures pigmentation, vascularity, pliability and scar height on the postoperative 6 month F/U

    Time frame: 6 month

  2. intercanthal distance ratio

    the ratio of the intercanthal distance to the interpupillary distance

    Time frame: 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Photographic measurement

    The scar width of the patient's picture at 6 month after surgery will be measured using photoshop CS3 extended. One ruler will be placed on the patient's nose before taken the photo. Then the scar width could be measured.

    Time frame: 6 month

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ru-Lin Huang
    Shanghai, 200011, China
    • Ru-Lin Huang, Ph.D., M.D. · Contact · hrl222@163.com · 86-15821950669
    • Chia-Kang Ho, M.D. · Contact · 610542307@qq.com · 86-13817381588
    • Tao Zan, Ph.D., M.D. · Principal investigator
    • Ru-Lin Huang, Ph.D., M.D. · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair: a double-blinded, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115690. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25541942 ↗
  • Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):511-516. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000416. PubMed 25158709 ↗
  • Al-Qattan MM, Al-Shanawani BN, Alshomer F. Botulinum toxin type A: implications in wound healing, facial cutaneous scarring, and cleft lip repair. Ann Saudi Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):482-8. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2013.482. PubMed 24188943 ↗
  • Zelken J, Yang SY, Chang CS, Chang CJ, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Chen HC, Hsiao YC. Donor Site Aesthetic Enhancement With Preoperative Botulinum Toxin in Forehead Flap Nasal Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Nov;77(5):535-538. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000625. PubMed 26418784 ↗
  • Kim YS, Lee HJ, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Early postoperative treatment of thyroidectomy scars using botulinum toxin: a split-scar, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen. 2014 Sep-Oct;22(5):605-12. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12204. Epub 2014 Aug 26. PubMed 24898579 ↗
  • Kwon B, Nguyen AH. Reconsideration of the Epicanthus: Evolution of the Eyelid and the Devolutional Concept of Asian Blepharoplasty. Semin Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;29(3):171-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556849. PubMed 26306084 ↗
  • Elhefnawy AM. Assessment of intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A injection for hypertrophic scars. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016 May-Jun;82(3):279-83. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.173586. PubMed 27088929 ↗
  • Shaarawy E, Hegazy RA, Abdel Hay RM. Intralesional botulinum toxin type A equally effective and better tolerated than intralesional steroid in the treatment of keloids: a randomized controlled trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015 Jun;14(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12134. Epub 2015 Mar 24. PubMed 25810045 ↗
  • Robinson AJ, Khadim MF, Khan K. Keloid scars and treatment with Botulinum Toxin Type A: the Belfast experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Mar;66(3):439-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.08.042. Epub 2012 Oct 23. No abstract available. PubMed 23092904 ↗
  • Zhang DZ, Liu XY, Xiao WL, Xu YX. Botulinum Toxin Type A and the Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars on the Maxillofacial Area and Neck: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151627. eCollection 2016. PubMed 26985661 ↗
  • Huang RL, Ho CK, Tremp M, Xie Y, Li Q, Zan T. Early Postoperative Application of Botulinum Toxin Type A Prevents Hypertrophic Scarring after Epicanthoplasty: A Split-Face, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):835-844. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006069. PubMed 31568286 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03294382
Lead sponsor
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Ru-Lin Huang (Ph.D., M.D., Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2017
Start date
Apr 1, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 27, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion