ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03293771Updated Apr 23, 2019

Transgender Post-reassignment Urogynecologic Measures and Perceptions

An observational study in Gender Identity Disorder of Adult, Voiding Disorders and Sexual Dysfunction, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-23.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The intent of this mixed methods study for transgender women after gender confirmation surgery is to characterize and subsequently create a validated screening questionnaire for postoperative urologic and pelvic floor symptoms. For individuals who seek gender-confirming treatment, about 13% undergo genital surgery for cosmetic purposes with or without gonadectomy, and this number is increasing. Patient satisfaction following surgery is high, particularly regarding sexual and cosmetic outcomes; however, unexpected negative functional outcomes such as bowel and bladder dysfunction and pelvic organ prolapse impact overall patient satisfaction. The available information suggests that 16-33% of patients experience incontinence postoperatively, with stress predominance, 32-47% experience abnormal voiding, and 24-66% experience overactive bladder symptoms. Outside of the typically assessed voiding symptoms, unique complaints of MTF postoperative patients include obstructive voiding symptoms due to urethral stenosis, persistent perimeatal erectile tissue, prostatic hypertrophy, and irritation from neovaginal tissue. Additionally, may of these patients develop symptomatic neovaginal prolapse, requiring re-suspension. We suggest that further clarification regarding MTF postoperative urologic and pelvic floor complaints can be achieved via a mixed methods approach. By using focus group interviews to create specific evaluative questions for this unique population, we can then prospectively assess patients undergoing surgery via a national multicenter sampling strategy. The goal of the study is to better understand the unique symptoms these women experience and create a validated, reliable screening questionnaire to monitor patients after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gender Identity Disorder of Adult
  • Voiding Disorders
  • Sexual Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Transgender women
  • Male-to-female
  • Gender confirmation surgery
  • Voiding disorder
  • Vaginal dysfunction
03

In context

Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

385 studies on the registry are indexed under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; 72 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 176 across 113 observational studies indexed under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological.

Browse Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 892 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 123 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Stage 1 (Focus group) participants will be comprised of healthy volunteers from the transgender community who have completed male-to-female gender confirmation surgery. They will be recruited through local clinics, physician referral, or community support groups.

Stage 2 (Questionnaire) participants will be recruited through multiple transgender centers at time of surgical scheduling or within 4 weeks after male-to-female gender confirmation surgery.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stage 1 -- Male-to-female transgender women who are at least 4 weeks postoperative following genital surgery for gender confirmation
  • Stage 2 -- Male-to-female transgender women who are scheduled to undergo surgery or are within 4 weeks postoperative
  • Both stages -- Minimum age 18 years old
  • Both stages -- English fluency
  • Both stages -- Reliable contact information and/or permanent residence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preexisting pelvic pathology, including abnormal anatomy or baseline voiding dysfunction
  • Urinary or intestinal problems prior to surgery lasting greater than 6 weeks
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Stage 1 Focus Groups

    The focus groups will involve transgender women who have completed gender confirmation surgery who volunteer to discuss their postoperative experience regarding bladder function, genital complaints, and sexual function.

    Other: Focus group interviews

  • Stage 2 Questionnaire Groups

    Stage 2 participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire packet after surgery followed by a second questionnaire completion 2 weeks later. Participants' operative notes and postoperative visit records will be reviewed.

    Diagnostic Test: Questionnaire packet

Interventions

  • OtherFocus group interviews

    Focus group participants will be asked about their postoperative urogynecologic experience. Confidentiality will be enforced and participants will be made aware that they may opt out of answering any questions.

  • Diagnostic testQuestionnaire packet

    Participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire packet comprised of three previously validated questionnaires and one newly created focused questionnaire. They will be asked to complete the new questionnaire again 2 weeks later. We estimate about 10 minutes will be required to complete the packet.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stage 1: Focus groups

    Characterization of genital, urologic, bowel, and sexual symptoms following male-to-female gender confirmation surgery

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Stage 2: Questionnaire testing

    Validity and reliability testing of new questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency and severity of symptoms

    Frequency and severity of symptoms

    Time frame: 15 months

  2. Relationship between surgical technique and symptoms

    Relationship between surgical technique and symptoms

    Time frame: 15 months

  3. Effect of hormonal therapy usage and symptoms

    Effect of hormonal therapy usage and symptoms

    Time frame: 15 months

  4. Length of time since surgery and development of symptoms

    Length of time since surgery and development of symptoms

    Time frame: 15 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10065, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Selvaggi G, Bellringer J. Gender reassignment surgery: an overview. Nat Rev Urol. 2011 May;8(5):274-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.46. Epub 2011 Apr 12. PubMed 21487386 ↗
  • Clements-Nolle K, Marx R, Katz M. Attempted suicide among transgender persons: The influence of gender-based discrimination and victimization. J Homosex. 2006;51(3):53-69. doi: 10.1300/J082v51n03_04. PubMed 17135115 ↗
  • Kailas M, Lu HMS, Rothman EF, Safer JD. PREVALENCE AND TYPES OF GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERY AMONG A SAMPLE OF TRANSGENDER ENDOCRINOLOGY PATIENTS PRIOR TO STATE EXPANSION OF INSURANCE COVERAGE. Endocr Pract. 2017 Jul;23(7):780-786. doi: 10.4158/EP161727.OR. Epub 2017 Apr 27. PubMed 28448757 ↗
  • Revol M, Servant JM, Banzet P. [Surgical treatment of male-to-female transsexuals: a ten-year experience assessment]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2006 Dec;51(6):499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2006.02.006. Epub 2006 Apr 19. French. PubMed 16626849 ↗
  • Hess J, Rossi Neto R, Panic L, Rubben H, Senf W. Satisfaction with male-to-female gender reassignment surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Nov 21;111(47):795-801. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0795. PubMed 25487762 ↗
  • Goddard JC, Vickery RM, Qureshi A, Summerton DJ, Khoosal D, Terry TR. Feminizing genitoplasty in adult transsexuals: early and long-term surgical results. BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):607-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07017.x. PubMed 17669144 ↗
  • Buncamper ME, van der Sluis WB, van der Pas RSD, Ozer M, Smit JM, Witte BI, Bouman MB, Mullender MG. Surgical Outcome after Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: A Retrospective Study of 475 Transgender Women. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Nov;138(5):999-1007. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002684. PubMed 27782992 ↗
  • Jarolim L, Sedy J, Schmidt M, Nanka O, Foltan R, Kawaciuk I. Gender reassignment surgery in male-to-female transsexualism: A retrospective 3-month follow-up study with anatomical remarks. J Sex Med. 2009 Jun;6(6):1635-1644. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01245.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30. PubMed 19473463 ↗
  • Rossi Neto R, Hintz F, Krege S, Rubben H, Vom Dorp F. Gender reassignment surgery--a 13 year review of surgical outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):97-107. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382012000100014. PubMed 22397771 ↗
  • Hoebeke P, Selvaggi G, Ceulemans P, De Cuypere G, T'Sjoen G, Weyers S, Decaestecker K, Monstrey S. Impact of sex reassignment surgery on lower urinary tract function. Eur Urol. 2005 Mar;47(3):398-402. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.10.008. Epub 2004 Dec 2. PubMed 15716207 ↗
  • Lawrence AA. Patient-reported complications and functional outcomes of male-to-female sex reassignment surgery. Arch Sex Behav. 2006 Dec;35(6):717-27. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9104-9. Epub 2006 Nov 16. PubMed 17109225 ↗
  • Horbach SE, Bouman MB, Smit JM, Ozer M, Buncamper ME, Mullender MG. Outcome of Vaginoplasty in Male-to-Female Transgenders: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques. J Sex Med. 2015 Jun;12(6):1499-512. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12868. Epub 2015 Mar 26. PubMed 25817066 ↗
  • Kuhn A, Santi A, Birkhauser M. Vaginal prolapse, pelvic floor function, and related symptoms 16 years after sex reassignment surgery in transsexuals. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun;95(7):2379-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.029. Epub 2011 Apr 2. PubMed 21458798 ↗
  • Kuhn A, Hiltebrand R, Birkhauser M. Do transsexuals have micturition disorders? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Apr;131(2):226-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.03.019. Epub 2006 May 5. PubMed 16678333 ↗
  • Dietrich W, Haitel A, Huber JC, Reiter WJ. Expression of estrogen receptors in human corpus cavernosum and male urethra. J Histochem Cytochem. 2004 Mar;52(3):355-60. doi: 10.1177/002215540405200306. PubMed 14966202 ↗
  • Huber S, Ferrando C, Safer JD, Pang JHY, Streed CG Jr, Priestley J, Culligan P. Development and Validation of Urological and Appearance Domains of the Post-Affirming Surgery Form and Function Individual Reporting Measure (AFFIRM) for Transwomen following Genital Surgery. J Urol. 2021 Dec;206(6):1445-1453. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002141. Epub 2021 Jul 21. PubMed 34288738 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2019, 24 months after the start.

Of 37 non-industry observational studies under Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 40 studies reached it within 42 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 65.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2017
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
StartActual
Dec 27, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2019
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2019
Last update
Apr 23, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03293771
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
Start date
Dec 27, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2019

Study contacts

Sarah Huber, MD
Contact
sah2757@med.cornell.edu
212-746-5352
Sarah Huber, MD
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion