ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03293485Updated Feb 12, 2021Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) in Japanese Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection or Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (MK-7655A-017)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection and Complicated Urinary Tract Infection, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed at 29 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-12.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (part of Merck & Co., Inc) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 11 studies in Intraabdominal Infections by Merck & Co., Inc — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Intraabdominal Infections · Merck & Co., Inc.

Enrollment
11th of 11
83 · median 134
Started
2017
the only one that year
Phase 3
6 of 11
none open now
Registered
10th of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in Intraabdominal Infections by Merck & Co., Inc, this one is the 11th largest by enrollment, is the only one that started in 2017, is one of 6 in phase 3, and was the 10th registered.

Intraabdominal Infections

129 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraabdominal Infections; 15 are open to participants now.

Browse Intraabdominal Infections studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 11 studies in Intraabdominal Infections by Merck & Co., Inc is open now. The open studies under Intraabdominal Infections, anywhere →

Who these studies take

Of the 10 Intraabdominal Infections studies recruiting now, 6 (60%) set no upper age limit and 3 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 11 studies in Intraabdominal Infections by Merck & Co., Inc as a file.
02

Study summary

The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of imipenem+cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL, MK-7655A) in Japanese participants with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) or complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI).

03

Conditions studied

  • Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
  • Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • requires hospitalization and treatment with IV antibiotic therapy for complicated intraabdominal infection (cIAI) or complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Per-protocol diagnostic criteria apply to the qualifying infection types.
  • infection is known or thought to be caused by microorganisms susceptible to the IV study therapy
  • baseline specimen for primary infection site culture obtained at operative procedure in Screening period or at Baseline for cIAI participants, and within 48 hours before initiation of IV study drug for cUTI participants
  • female or male who is not of , or female or male who is of reproductive potential and agrees to avoid becoming pregnant or impregnating a partner from the time of consent through completion of the study, by practicing abstinence from heterosexual activity or using acceptable during heterosexual activity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • received any amount of effective antibiotic therapy after obtaining the culture for admission to the study and before administration of the first dose of IV study therapy
  • received treatment with systemic effective antibiotics for >24 hours within the 72 hours before initiation of study therapy
  • has a concurrent infection, including endocarditis, osteomyelitis, meningitis, or prosthetic joint infection, that would interfere with evaluation of response to IMI/REL
  • has a cIAI or cUTI due to a confirmed fungal pathogen
  • has a cUTI that meets any of the following: 1) complete obstruction of any portion of the urinary tract, 2) known ileal loop, 3) intractable vesico-ureteral reflux, 4) presence of indwelling urinary catheter which cannot be removed at study entry
  • has a cIAI that meets any of the following: 1) infection that should be managed by Staged Abdominal Repair (STAR) or open abdomen therapy, 2) infection limited to the hollow viscus
  • history of serious allergy, , or any serious reaction to any carbapenem, cephalosporin, penicillin or other beta-lactam agent, or other beta-lactamase inhibitors
  • female who is pregnant or is expecting to conceive, is breastfeeding, or plans to breastfeed before completion of the study
  • history of a seizure disorder
  • anticipates to be treated with valproic acid, concomitant IV or an oral antimicrobial considered effective to the index pathogen, in addition to the study treatment
  • is receiving therapy, including high-dose
  • is undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
  • participated in any other clinical study involving an or experimental medication during the previous 30 days before Screening.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam

    Participants with cIAI or cUTI will receive imipenem+cilastatin/relebactam intravenous (IV) infusion once every 6 hours for 5 to 14 days

    Drug: Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam

Interventions

  • DrugImipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam

    Drug pages: Imipenem · Cilastatin · Relebactam

    Imipenem+Cilastatin/Relebactam 200/100 mg to 500/250 mg, depending on renal function, 30-minute IV infusion once every 6 hours

    Also known as: IMI/REL, MK-7655A

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AE)

    The percentage of participants experiencing ≥1 AE was calculated. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy could be determined.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

    The percentage of participants who discontinued from study medication due to an adverse event was calculated. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy could be determined.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days (End of Therapy Visit)

  3. Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at End of Therapy Visit

    The percentage of participants with cIAI who display a favorable clinical response at End of Therapy visit was presented. Per protocol, a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cIAI were evaluated because clinical response is primarily relevant to cIAI. Favorable clinical response is a rating of "cure" or "improved" as determined by the investigator at the End of Therapy Visit. "Cure" is defined as: all pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed. "Improved" is defined as: All or most pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have improved or resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed.

    Time frame: Between Day 5 and Day 14 (End of Therapy Visit)

  4. Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at End of Therapy Visit

    The percentage of participants with cUTI who display a favorable Overall Microbiological Response at the End of Therapy visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cUTI were evaluated because the microbiological response evaluation is primarily relevant to cUTI. A favorable Overall Microbiological Response is defined as a urine culture taken at the End of Therapy Visit showing eradication (e.g., ≥10\^5 CFU/mL is reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL) of all uropathogens found at study entry.

    Time frame: Between Day 5 and Day 14 (End of Therapy Visit)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit

    The percentage of participants with cIAI who display a favorable Clinical Response at the Test of Cure visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cIAI were evaluated because the clinical response evaluation is primarily relevant to cIAI. A favorable clinical response is a rating of "cure" as determined by the investigator at the Test of Cure Visit. "Cure" is defined as: all pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have resolved (or returned to "preinfection status") AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed.

    Time frame: Between Day 10 and Day 23 (Test of Cure Visit)

  2. Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at Test of Cure Visit

    The percentage of participants with cUTI who display a favorable Overall Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cUTI were evaluated because the microbiological response evaluation is primarily relevant to cUTI. A favorable Overall Microbiological Response is defined as a urine culture taken at the Test of Cure visit still showing eradication (e.g., ≥10\^5 CFU/mL is reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL) of all uropathogens found at study entry.

    Time frame: Between Day 10 and Day 23 (Test of Cure Visit)

07

Results

Posted Sep 17, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonecIAI/cUTI
Started83
Treated81
Completed78
Not completed5
Withdrew: Death1
Withdrew: Screen failure2
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AE)

The percentage of participants experiencing ≥1 AE was calculated. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy could be determined.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AE)
Percentage of ParticipantscIAI/cUTI
Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Adverse Events (AE)74.1 (63.5 to 82.4)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)

The percentage of participants who discontinued from study medication due to an adverse event was calculated. An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with the use of study therapy, regardless of whether or not a causal relationship with the study therapy could be determined.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days (End of Therapy Visit)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)
Percentage of ParticipantscIAI/cUTI
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event (AE)4.9 (1.6 to 12.4)
PrimaryPercentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at End of Therapy Visit

The percentage of participants with cIAI who display a favorable clinical response at End of Therapy visit was presented. Per protocol, a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cIAI were evaluated because clinical response is primarily relevant to cIAI. Favorable clinical response is a rating of "cure" or "improved" as determined by the investigator at the End of Therapy Visit. "Cure" is defined as: all pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed. "Improved" is defined as: All or most pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have improved or resolved (or returned to preinfection status) AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed.

Time frame:
Between Day 5 and Day 14 (End of Therapy Visit)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at End of Therapy Visit
Percentage of ParticipantscIAI
Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at End of Therapy Visit85.7 (67.9 to 94.9)
PrimaryPercentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at End of Therapy Visit

The percentage of participants with cUTI who display a favorable Overall Microbiological Response at the End of Therapy visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cUTI were evaluated because the microbiological response evaluation is primarily relevant to cUTI. A favorable Overall Microbiological Response is defined as a urine culture taken at the End of Therapy Visit showing eradication (e.g., ≥10\^5 CFU/mL is reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL) of all uropathogens found at study entry.

Time frame:
Between Day 5 and Day 14 (End of Therapy Visit)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at End of Therapy Visit
Percentage of ParticipantscUTI
Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at End of Therapy Visit100 (89.3 to 100.0)
SecondaryPercentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit

The percentage of participants with cIAI who display a favorable Clinical Response at the Test of Cure visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cIAI were evaluated because the clinical response evaluation is primarily relevant to cIAI. A favorable clinical response is a rating of "cure" as determined by the investigator at the Test of Cure Visit. "Cure" is defined as: all pretherapy signs and symptoms of the index infection(s) have resolved (or returned to "preinfection status") AND no additional intravenous antibiotic therapy is required AND no unplanned surgical or percutaneous drainage procedures have been performed.

Time frame:
Between Day 10 and Day 23 (Test of Cure Visit)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit
Percentage of ParticipantscIAI
Percentage of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection (cIAI) Participants With Favorable Clinical Response at Test of Cure Visit82.1 (63.9 to 92.6)
SecondaryPercentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at Test of Cure Visit

The percentage of participants with cUTI who display a favorable Overall Microbiological Response at the Test of Cure visit was calculated. Per protocol, only a subset of the cIAI/cUTI study arm was analyzed: only participants with cUTI were evaluated because the microbiological response evaluation is primarily relevant to cUTI. A favorable Overall Microbiological Response is defined as a urine culture taken at the Test of Cure visit still showing eradication (e.g., ≥10\^5 CFU/mL is reduced to \<10\^4 CFU/mL) of all uropathogens found at study entry.

Time frame:
Between Day 10 and Day 23 (Test of Cure Visit)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at Test of Cure Visit
Percentage of ParticipantscUTI
Percentage of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection (cUTI) Participants With Favorable Overall Microbiological Response at Test of Cure Visit59.0 (43.4 to 72.9)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 28 days (up to 14 days after completion of intravenous study therapy). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
cIAI/cUTI1/81 (1.2%)9/81 (11.1%)18/81 (22.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventcIAI/cUTI
Abdominal abscessInfections and infestations2/81
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachmentEye disorders1/81
Large intestine perforationGastrointestinal disorders1/81
Pancreatitis acuteGastrointestinal disorders1/81
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders1/81
Pelvic abscessInfections and infestations1/81
PeritonitisInfections and infestations1/81
Postoperative ileusInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/81
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/81
Renal haematomaRenal and urinary disorders1/81
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventcIAI/cUTI
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/81
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/81
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/81

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)cIAI/cUTI
Mean62.8 ± 18.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)cIAI/cUTI
Female45
Male38
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)cIAI/cUTI
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino83
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)cIAI/cUTI
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian83
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Infection Type
Infection Type(Participants)cIAI/cUTI
cIAI39
cUTI44
08

Study locations

29 sites
  • Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital ( Site 1724)
    Nagoya, Aichi 454-8502, Japan
  • Toyota Memorial Hospital ( Site 1708)
    Toyota, Aichi 471-8513, Japan
  • Medical Corporation Chiyukai Fukuoka Shin Mizumaki Hospital ( Site 1710)
    Onga-gun, Fukuoka 807-0051, Japan
  • Shin Yukuhashi Hospital ( Site 1722)
    Yukuhashi, Fukuoka 824-0026, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center ( Site 1706)
    Fukuyama, Hiroshima 720-8520, Japan
  • Fukuyama City Hospital ( Site 1721)
    Fukuyama, Hiroshima 721-8511, Japan
  • KKR Sapporo Medical Center ( Site 1728)
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 062-0931, Japan
  • Sano Hospital ( Site 1701)
    Kobe, Hyogo 655-0031, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center ( Site 1729)
    Higashiibaraki-gun, Ibaraki 311-3193, Japan
  • Medical Corporation Tokushukai Koga General Hospital ( Site 1712)
    Koga, Ibaraki 306-0041, Japan
  • Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital ( Site 1707)
    Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8530, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Kanazawa Medical Center ( Site 1716)
    Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-8650, Japan
  • Kawahara Clinic ( Site 1719)
    Aira, Kagoshima 899-5431, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center ( Site 1702)
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 245-8575, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Mie Chuo Medical Center ( Site 1727)
    Tsu, Mie 514-1101, Japan
  • Japan Labour Health And Safety Organization Tohoku Rosai Hospital ( Site 1714)
    Sendai, Miyagi 981-8563, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center ( Site 1723)
    Sendai, Miyagi 983-8520, Japan
  • Suwa Red Cross Hospital ( Site 1705)
    Suwa, Nagano 392-8510, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center ( Site 1718)
    Omura, Nagasaki 856-8562, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center ( Site 1715)
    Kawachinagano, Osaka 586-8521, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Utsunomiya National Hospital ( Site 1711)
    Utsunomiya, Tochigi 329-1193, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Minami Wakayama Medical Center ( Site 1725)
    Tanabe, Wakayama 646-8558, Japan
  • Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital ( Site 1703)
    Kofu, Yamanashi 400-8506, Japan
  • Fukuiken Saiseikai Hospital ( Site 1704)
    Fukui, 918-8503, Japan
  • Medical Corporation Chiyukai Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital ( Site 1709)
    Fukuoka, 811-0213, Japan
  • Medical Corporation Shingenkai Kawahara Urological Clinic ( Site 1726)
    Kagoshima, 890-0073, Japan
  • Medical Corporation Seifukai Yagi Clinic ( Site 1720)
    Kagoshima, 891-0105, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center ( Site 1713)
    Kumamoto, 860-0008, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Oita Medical Center ( Site 1717)
    Oita, 870-0263, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kohno S, Bando H, Yoneyama F, Kikukawa H, Kawahara K, Shirakawa M, Aoyama N, Brown M, Paschke A, Takase A. The safety and efficacy of relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection: A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative phase 3 study. J Infect Chemother. 2021 Feb;27(2):262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.032. Epub 2020 Nov 13. PubMed 33191112 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Data sharing details ↗ · engagezone.msd.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2018, 11 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2019, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2017
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
StartActual
Oct 4, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 14, 2018
CompletionActual
Sep 14, 2018
Results first posted
Sep 17, 2019
Last update
Feb 12, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03293485
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 26, 2017
Start date
Oct 4, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 14, 2018
Completion
Sep 14, 2018
Results posted
Sep 17, 2019
Last update
Feb 12, 2021

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Imipenem · Cilastatin · Relebactam

Start the discussion