CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03291587OaSiSUpdated Jul 25, 2022Results posted

Implementation of Smoking Cessation Within NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Sites

An interventional study of Personnel Training and Coaching Calls in Smoking Cessation, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 49 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-25.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,094
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluate a multi-faceted training program to improve short-term smoking cessation rates (\<14 days post-visit) and short (3 months) and sustained abstinence (6 months) among 1,114 enrolled smokers who present for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening in 26 community-based practices.

Read the detailed description

We utilize an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design, employing a cluster, randomized control trial of community-based NCORP sites to study the effectiveness of a multi-faceted intervention to improve smoking cessation among lung cancer screening patients, as well as dissemination and implementation (D\&I) science to optimize and accelerate translation of findings into clinical practice. We will: (1) Evaluate a multi-faceted training program to improve short-term smoking cessation rates (1-week post-visit) and sustained abstinence (6 months) among 1,114 enrolled smokers (557 in each trial arm) who present for LDCT lung cancer screening in community-based lung cancer screening practices; (2) Characterize the adoption and adaptation of the evidence-based tobacco cessation strategies in 26 community-based LDCT lung cancer screening programs; and (3) Develop and evaluate an implementation toolkit for integrating evidence-based tobacco cessation strategies in community-based LDCT lung cancer screening programs. Qualitative data will be collected from key informants at participating screening programs during and after intervention implementation. Quantitative survey data (baseline, \<14 days, 3 months, and 6 months) and saliva specimens (6 months only) will be collected from smoking patients receiving screening within these programs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking Cessation

Keywords

  • lung cancer
  • cancer screening
  • tobacco use
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Agrees to have NCORP research personnel serve as the study liaison and another person to serve as the cessation program champion.
  • Agrees to participate in all aspects of the intervention, randomization, and evaluation.
  • Agrees to participate in a confidential 1-on-1 semi-structured interview with the research team.
  • Agrees to have the interview taped, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Potential participants will be screened using the following question: "Do you smoke cigarettes every day, some days, or not at all?" (BRFSS). A current smoker is anyone responds "every day" or "some days".

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use (previous 30 days) of a tobacco dependence treatment including bupropion, varenicline, and nicotine replacement
  • Individuals who use e-cigarettes and who are not smoking cigarettes. Dual users (those who use both e-cigarettes and cigarettes) will still be included in the trial.
  • The presence of a physical or cognitive impairment that would prevent a person from engaging in survey research (such as blindness, deafness, or dementia).
  • Individual has already completed the intended LDCT lung cancer screening for this study.
  • Non-English speaking participants.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,094 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Training of Lung Cancer Screening Personnel on implementation of the United States Public Health Service (US PHS) Guidelines for Smoking Cessation and Performance Coaching during Implementation Phase of the Study Data collection from Patients: demographics, health status, smoking history, quitting behavior, perceptions of lung cancer risk and worry, impact of screening on tobacco use behavior, and exposure to the intervention. (baseline, \<14 days, 3 months, and 6 months)

    Other: Personnel Training and Coaching Calls

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    No training or performance coaching calls on personnel, just usual clinic practice. Data collection from Patients: demographics, health status, smoking history, quitting behavior, perceptions of lung cancer risk and worry, impact of screening on tobacco use behavior, and exposure to the intervention. (baseline, \<14 days, 3 months, and 6 months)

Interventions

  • OtherPersonnel Training and Coaching Calls

    Training of Lung Cancer Screening Personnel on implementation of the US PHS Guidelines for Smoking Cessation and Performance Coaching during Implementation Phase of the Study Each site will have a coaching team: two members of our research team including an expert in tobacco cessation and an expert in lung cancer screening. Active coaching includes six, 1-1 ½ hour video exchanges among program sites and coaching teams, once every 4-6 weeks over an 8-month implementation phase. One week prior to the call, each site will be prompted with an email to inform the coaching team of any challenges associated with implementation.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients With 7-day Sustained Smoking Abstinence Reported in the Patient Survey

    7-day sustained smoking abstinence will be measured by the question "Have you smoked a cigarette (or other tobacco products), even a puff, in the last 7 days?" in patient survey.

    Time frame: 6 months (after baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Salivary Cotinine Test for Non-Smokers

    7-day Sustained Smoking abstinence will be validated using a salivary cotinine test in non smokers. Abstinence will be determined by percentage of smokers whose tests come back negative for cotinine. Low levels of cotinine less than 15 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) would suggest true smoking cessation and levels higher than or equal to 15 mg/mL would suggest they are still smoking.

    Time frame: 6 months (after baseline)

  2. Short-term Smoking Abstinence - Patient Survey

    Short-tem smoking abstinence will be measured as part of the patient survey as the percentage of patients who report that they have not smoked.

    Time frame: 3 months (after baseline)

  3. Total Number of Services Participant Reported Received at 14 Days

    Fidelity to the intervention will be measured by a patient survey that asks patients if they received up to 18 cessation services during the screening visit. This is the total each participant reported receiving and can range from 0 to 18, with higher values representing more services.

    Time frame: <= 14 days after baseline

06

Results

Posted Jul 25, 2022
Limitations and caveats
Some sites dropped out early and did not accrue all 50 participants.

Participant flow

Twenty-six radiology facilities in twenty states were selected to participate. Clinics were matched based on lung screening volume and racial/ethnic diversity, and then assigned to the intervention or usual care group. Radiology facilities in the intervention arm participated in multi-faceted implementation strategies targeting the radiology facility and its clinical team. Each clinic was asked to recruit 50 participants.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInterventionUsual Care
Started523571
14 day follow-up483547
3 month follow-up445538
Completed442514
Not completed8157
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up6243
Withdrew: Refused to answer52
Withdrew: Death24
Withdrew: Not interested in participating86
Withdrew: Too busy to participate42

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Patients With 7-day Sustained Smoking Abstinence Reported in the Patient Survey

7-day sustained smoking abstinence will be measured by the question "Have you smoked a cigarette (or other tobacco products), even a puff, in the last 7 days?" in patient survey.

Time frame:
6 months (after baseline)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients With 7-day Sustained Smoking Abstinence Reported in the Patient Survey
percentage of participantsInterventionUsual Care
Percentage of Patients With 7-day Sustained Smoking Abstinence Reported in the Patient Survey13.0 (9.7 to 17.4)13.5 (10.3 to 17.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention vs Usual Care · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.865 · Odds ratio (or): 0.967 · 96% CI 0.652 to 1.433
SecondarySalivary Cotinine Test for Non-Smokers

7-day Sustained Smoking abstinence will be validated using a salivary cotinine test in non smokers. Abstinence will be determined by percentage of smokers whose tests come back negative for cotinine. Low levels of cotinine less than 15 milligrams per milliliter (mg/mL) would suggest true smoking cessation and levels higher than or equal to 15 mg/mL would suggest they are still smoking.

Time frame:
6 months (after baseline)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Salivary Cotinine Test for Non-Smokers
ParticipantsInterventionUsual Care
High: greater than or equal to 15 mg/mL1310
Low: Less than 15 mg/mL1020
Unknown, not tested2831
SecondaryShort-term Smoking Abstinence - Patient Survey

Short-tem smoking abstinence will be measured as part of the patient survey as the percentage of patients who report that they have not smoked.

Time frame:
3 months (after baseline)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of participants
Short-term Smoking Abstinence - Patient Survey
percentage of participantsInterventionUsual Care
Short-term Smoking Abstinence - Patient Survey6.5 (4.4 to 9.5)5.5 (3.8 to 8.0)
SecondaryTotal Number of Services Participant Reported Received at 14 Days

Fidelity to the intervention will be measured by a patient survey that asks patients if they received up to 18 cessation services during the screening visit. This is the total each participant reported receiving and can range from 0 to 18, with higher values representing more services.

Time frame:
<= 14 days after baseline
Reported as:
Least squares mean · total services reported
Total Number of Services Participant Reported Received at 14 Days
total services reportedInterventionUsual Care
Total Number of Services Participant Reported Received at 14 Days7.51 ± 6.337.86 ± 6.07

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention2/523 (0.4%)——
Usual Care4/571 (0.7%)——

Baseline characteristics

1094 excludes the 6 that were deemed ineligible from the total of 1100 recruited

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Age in years — 55-64286333619
Age in years — 65-74213220433
Age in years — 75 or older241842
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Gender, participant reported — Male249281530
Gender, participant reported — Female269283552
Gender, participant reported — Non-Binary235
Gender, participant reported — Not Reported347
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Race/Ethnicity — White, non-Hispanic423452875
Race/Ethnicity — Black, non-Hispanic6874142
Race/Ethnicity — Hispanic, all races52328
Race/Ethnicity — American Indian, non-Hispanic111324
Race/Ethnicity — Not Reported16925
Education
Education(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
No high school degree, high school degree, or completion of General Education Development (GED) test248307555
Some post high school education or college degree or graduate degree272260532
Not reported347
Annual Household Income
Annual Household Income(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Less than $1500094137231
$15000 - $34999113133246
$35000 - $64999116116232
$65000 or higher117109226
Not Reported8376159
Marital Status
Marital Status(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Married265284549
Not Currently Married254283537
Not Reported448
Employment
Employment(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Working full- or part-time173187360
Retired226226452
Disabled98124222
Homemaker, Caregiver, Student, or Unemployed243155
Not Reported235
Personal Cancer History
Personal Cancer History(Participants)InterventionUsual CareTotal
Count of participants414081

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

49 sites
  • Helen F Graham Cancer Center
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Augusta University Medical Center
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
  • Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
    Savannah, Georgia 31405, United States
  • Tripler Army Medical Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96859, United States
  • Good Samaritan Regional Health Center
    Mount Vernon, Illinois 62864, United States
  • Carle Cancer Center
    Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
  • McFarland Clinic PC - Ames
    Ames, Iowa 50010, United States
  • Mercy Medical Center - Des Moines
    Des Moines, Iowa 50314, United States
  • LSU Health Sciences Center at Shreveport
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, United States
  • Spectrum Health at Butterworth Campus
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • Ridgeview Medical Center
    Waconia, Minnesota 55387, United States
  • Saint Louis Cancer and Breast Institute-Ballwin
    Ballwin, Missouri 63011, United States
  • Central Care Cancer Center - Bolivar
    Bolivar, Missouri 65613, United States
  • Cox Cancer Center Branson
    Branson, Missouri 65616, United States
  • Freeman Health System
    Joplin, Missouri 64804, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Joplin
    Joplin, Missouri 64804, United States
  • Delbert Day Cancer Institute at PCRMC
    Rolla, Missouri 65401, United States
  • Mercy Clinic-Rolla-Cancer and Hematology
    Rolla, Missouri 65401, United States
  • Saint Louis Cancer and Breast Institute-South City
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63109, United States
  • Missouri Baptist Medical Center
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Saint Louis
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Springfield
    Springfield, Missouri 65804, United States
  • CoxHealth South Hospital
    Springfield, Missouri 65807, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Washington
    Washington, Missouri 63090, United States
  • University Medical Center of Southern Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89102, United States
  • Saint Mary's Regional Medical Center
    Reno, Nevada 89503, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center - Moses Campus
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Sanford South University Medical Center
    Fargo, North Dakota 58103, United States
  • Sanford Roger Maris Cancer Center
    Fargo, North Dakota 58122, United States
  • Adena Regional Medical Center
    Chillicothe, Ohio 45601, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Geisinger Medical Center
    Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Spartanburg
    Boiling Springs, South Carolina 29316, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Laurens
    Clinton, South Carolina 29325, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Easley
    Easley, South Carolina 29640, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Butternut
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Faris
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • Prisma Health Greenville Memorial Hospital
    Greenville, South Carolina 29605, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Eastside
    Greenville, South Carolina 29615, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Greer
    Greer, South Carolina 29650, United States
  • Prisma Health Cancer Institute - Seneca
    Seneca, South Carolina 29672, United States
  • Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Memphis
    Memphis, Tennessee 38120, United States
  • VCU Massey Cancer Center at Stony Point
    Richmond, Virginia 23235, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
    La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601, United States
  • Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53215, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29. PubMed 21714641 ↗
  • Taylor DH Jr, Hasselblad V, Henley SJ, Thun MJ, Sloan FA. Benefits of smoking cessation for longevity. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):990-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.990. Erratum In: Am J Public Health 2002 Sep;92(9):1389. PubMed 12036794 ↗
  • Hermanson B, Omenn GS, Kronmal RA, Gersh BJ. Beneficial six-year outcome of smoking cessation in older men and women with coronary artery disease. Results from the CASS registry. N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 24;319(21):1365-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811243192101. PubMed 3185646 ↗
  • Gellert C, Schottker B, Brenner H. Smoking and all-cause mortality in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jun 11;172(11):837-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1397. PubMed 22688992 ↗
  • Parsons A, Daley A, Begh R, Aveyard P. Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010 Jan 21;340:b5569. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b5569. PubMed 20093278 ↗
  • Black WC, Gareen IF, Soneji SS, Sicks JD, Keeler EB, Aberle DR, Naeim A, Church TR, Silvestri GA, Gorelick J, Gatsonis C; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1793-802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312547. PubMed 25372087 ↗
  • McMahon PM, Kong CY, Bouzan C, Weinstein MC, Cipriano LE, Tramontano AC, Johnson BE, Weeks JC, Gazelle GS. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the United States. J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Nov;6(11):1841-8. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e59b3. PubMed 21892105 ↗
  • Zeliadt SB, Heffner JL, Sayre G, Klein DE, Simons C, Williams J, Reinke LF, Au DH. Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1530-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3558. PubMed 26214612 ↗
  • Moyer VA; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):330-8. doi: 10.7326/M13-2771. PubMed 24378917 ↗
  • Ostroff JS, Copeland A, Borderud SP, Li Y, Shelley DR, Henschke CI. Readiness of Lung Cancer Screening Sites to Deliver Smoking Cessation Treatment: Current Practices, Organizational Priority, and Perceived Barriers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1067-75. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv177. Epub 2015 Sep 7. PubMed 26346948 ↗
  • Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009. PubMed 18617085 ↗
  • Tong EK, Strouse R, Hall J, Kovac M, Schroeder SA. National survey of U.S. health professionals' smoking prevalence, cessation practices, and beliefs. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):724-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq071. Epub 2010 May 27. PubMed 20507899 ↗
  • Okuyemi KS, Reitzel LR, Fagan P. Interventions to Reduce Tobacco-Related Health Disparities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):887-91. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv096. No abstract available. PubMed 26180213 ↗
  • Foley KL, Pockey JR, Helme DW, Song EY, Stewart K, Jones C, Spangler JG, Sutfin EL. Integrating evidence-based tobacco cessation interventions in free medical clinics: opportunities and challenges. Health Promot Pract. 2012 Sep;13(5):687-95. doi: 10.1177/1524839911433465. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PubMed 22467664 ↗
  • Pockey JR, Song EY, Sutfin EL, Spangler JG, Jones C, Helme DW, Foley KL. The need for tobacco cessation in a free clinic population. Addict Behav. 2012 Dec;37(12):1299-302. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.032. Epub 2012 Jul 4. PubMed 22958861 ↗
  • Error in Text and Table. Primary Care Provider-Delivered Smoking Cessation Interventions and Smoking Cessation Among Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1587-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4006. No abstract available. PubMed 26348525 ↗
  • Fiore MC, Goplerud E, Schroeder SA. The Joint Commission's new tobacco-cessation measures--will hospitals do the right thing? N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 29;366(13):1172-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1115176. Epub 2012 Mar 14. No abstract available. PubMed 22417200 ↗
  • G.A. Colditz. The promise and challenges of dissemination and implementation research. In: Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  • Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Yearb Med Inform. 2000;(1):65-70. No abstract available. PubMed 27699347 ↗
  • Brownson RC, Jones E. Bridging the gap: translating research into policy and practice. Prev Med. 2009 Oct;49(4):313-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jun 22. PubMed 19555708 ↗
  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322. PubMed 10474547 ↗
  • Goulart BH, Ramsey SD. Moving beyond the national lung screening trial: discussing strategies for implementation of lung cancer screening programs. Oncologist. 2013;18(8):941-6. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0007. Epub 2013 Jul 19. PubMed 23873718 ↗
  • Marcus PM. Lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT): looking back and moving forward. Ann Transl Med. 2015 May;3(Suppl 1):S41. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.03.36. No abstract available. PubMed 26046089 ↗
  • Kent EE, Mitchell SA, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Kaluzny AD, Hautala JA, Grad O, Ballard RM, McCaskill-Stevens WJ, Kramer BS, Clauser SB. Cancer Care Delivery Research: Building the Evidence Base to Support Practice Change in Community Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 20;33(24):2705-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.6210. Epub 2015 Jul 20. PubMed 26195715 ↗
  • Minasian LM, Carpenter WR, Weiner BJ, Anderson DE, McCaskill-Stevens W, Nelson S, Whitman C, Kelaghan J, O'Mara AM, Kaluzny AD. Translating research into evidence-based practice: the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Program. Cancer. 2010 Oct 1;116(19):4440-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25248. PubMed 20572032 ↗
  • Fiore M, Jaen C, Baker T, Bailey W, Benowitz N, Curry S. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update - TreatingTobaccoUseandDependence-2008Update.pdf. http://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/clinical_recommendations/TreatingTobaccoUseandDependence-2008Update.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed January 11, 2017.
  • Spangler JG, Song EY, Pockey JR, Sutfin EL, Helme DW, Jones C, Foley KL. Predictors of Clinician Tobacco Intervention Counseling in Six North Carolina Free Clinics. Tob Use Insights. 2012 Jul 10;20125:11-16. doi: 10.4137/TUI.S9350. PubMed 23843713 ↗
  • McNamara RS, Y Song E, Reboussin BA, Spangler J, Pockey JR, Kimes C, Foley KL, Sutfin EL. Motivational interviewing intervention with college student tobacco users: providers' beliefs and behaviors. J Am Coll Health. 2015;63(4):286-90. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.1003376. PubMed 25580630 ↗
  • Lewis JA, Petty WJ, Tooze JA, Miller DP, Chiles C, Miller AA, Bellinger C, Weaver KE. Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Practices and Attitudes among Primary Care Providers at an Academic Medical Center. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Apr;24(4):664-70. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1241. Epub 2015 Jan 22. PubMed 25613118 ↗
  • Foley KL, Farmer DF, Petronis VM, Smith RG, McGraw S, Smith K, Carver CS, Avis N. A qualitative exploration of the cancer experience among long-term survivors: comparisons by cancer type, ethnicity, gender, and age. Psychooncology. 2006 Mar;15(3):248-58. doi: 10.1002/pon.942. PubMed 15940742 ↗
  • Foley KL, Crandall SJ, George G, Roman M, Spangler JG. Reliability of a Smoking Cessation Risk Factor Interview Scale (SCRFIS) for use with standardized patient instructors. J Cancer Educ. 2003 Fall;18(3):134-41. doi: 10.1207/S15430154JCE1803_06. PubMed 14582483 ↗
  • Spangler JG, George G, Foley KL, Crandall SJ. Tobacco intervention training: current efforts and gaps in US medical schools. JAMA. 2002 Sep 4;288(9):1102-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.9.1102. PubMed 12204079 ↗
  • Foley KL, Sutfin EL. Availability of tobacco cessation services in free clinics. N C Med J. 2008 Jul-Aug;69(4):270-4. PubMed 18828315 ↗
  • Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. PubMed 22310560 ↗
  • SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002 May;4(2):149-59. doi: 10.1080/14622200210123581. No abstract available. PubMed 12028847 ↗
  • Holt DT, Armenakis AA, Feild HS, Harris SG. Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale. J Appl Behav Sci. 2007;43(2):232-255. doi:10.1177/0021886306295295.
  • Bradley EH, Curry LA, Ramanadhan S, Rowe L, Nembhard IM, Krumholz HM. Research in action: using positive deviance to improve quality of health care. Implement Sci. 2009 May 8;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-25. PubMed 19426507 ↗
  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x. PubMed 15595944 ↗
  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Peacock R. Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jul;61(2):417-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 26. PubMed 15893056 ↗
  • Kowalski K, Casper C. The coaching process: an effective tool for professional development. Nurs Adm Q. 2007 Apr-Jun;31(2):171-9. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000264867.73873.1a. PubMed 17413512 ↗
  • Papadakis S, Pipe AL, Reid RD, Tulloch H, Mullen KA, Assi R, Cole AG, Wells G. Effectiveness of performance coaching for enhancing rates of smoking cessation treatment delivery by primary care providers: Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 5. PubMed 26348788 ↗
  • Glasgow RE, Green LW, Taylor MV, Stange KC. An evidence integration triangle for aligning science with policy and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.016. PubMed 22608384 ↗
  • Newhouse R, Bobay K, Dykes PC, Stevens KR, Titler M. Methodology issues in implementation science. Med Care. 2013 Apr;51(4 Suppl 2):S32-40. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feeca. PubMed 23502915 ↗
  • Etter JF, Neidhart E, Bertrand S, Malafosse A, Bertrand D. Collecting saliva by mail for genetic and cotinine analyses in participants recruited through the Internet. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(10):833-8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-005-2148-7. PubMed 16283473 ↗
  • Strecher VJ, McClure J, Alexander G, Chakraborty B, Nair V, Konkel J, Greene S, Couper M, Carlier C, Wiese C, Little R, Pomerleau C, Pomerleau O. The role of engagement in a tailored web-based smoking cessation program: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 4;10(5):e36. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1002. PubMed 18984557 ↗
  • Bock BC, Papandonatos GD, de Dios MA, Abrams DB, Azam MM, Fagan M, Sweeney PJ, Stein MD, Niaura R. Tobacco cessation among low-income smokers: motivational enhancement and nicotine patch treatment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Apr;16(4):413-22. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt166. Epub 2013 Oct 30. PubMed 24174612 ↗
  • Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Analysis of a cluster randomized trial with binary outcome data using a multi-level model. Stat Med. 2000 Oct 15;19(19):2675-88. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001015)19:193.0.co;2-a. PubMed 10986541 ↗
  • Schauer GL, Malarcher AM, Asman KJ. Trends in the Average Age of Quitting Among U.S. Adult Cigarette Smokers. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6):939-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Sep 9. PubMed 26362404 ↗
  • D'Agostino R, Karter A, Lang W, Walkup M, Morgan T. Examining the impact of missing data on propensity score estimation in determining the effectiveness of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2001;2:291-315.
  • D'Agostino RB, Rubin DB. Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000;95(451):749-759. doi:10.2307/2669455.
  • D'Agostino RB Jr, D'Agostino RB Sr. Estimating treatment effects using observational data. JAMA. 2007 Jan 17;297(3):314-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.3.314. No abstract available. PubMed 17227985 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 10, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Dec 10, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Wake Forest (WF) NCORP Research Base (RB) is committed to following the NIH Statement on Sharing Research Data (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html). As of July 2018, the WF NCORP RB signed an agreement with NCI to contribute de-identified data and data dictionaries from clinical trials conducted through our RB to the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN)/NCORP data archive within 6 months of primary and non-primary publications of phase II/III and phase III trials (https://nctn-data-archive.nci.nih.gov/). This will become the primary means for sharing raw data and we will adhere to the guidelines spelled out in the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive Usage Guide.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03291587
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
Start date
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 22, 2021
Completion
Feb 22, 2021
Results posted
Jul 25, 2022
Last update
Jul 25, 2022

Study contacts

Kristie Foley, PhD
study chair · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion