ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03291171Updated Dec 6, 2021

Identifying the Effect and Working Mechanisms of MyPlan 2.0 in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

An interventional study of MyPlan 2.0 in Chronic Disease, sponsored by University Ghent. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-06.

Primary conditionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Registry: Chronic DiseaseReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Chronic Disease — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Why
  1. Chronic Disease is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's title name Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate whether and how 'MyPlan 2.0' helps adults with type 2 diabetes to be more physically active or less sedentary. Two groups will be created, an intervention group and a waiting-list control group.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to investigate whether and how 'MyPlan 2.0' helps adults with type 2 diabetes to be more physically active or less sedentary. Two groups will be created, an intervention group and a waiting-list control group. Both groups will be tested during three testing waves: pretest, posttest and follow-up test. Only the intervention group will be given acces to 'MyPlan 2.0'. 'MyPlan 2.0' consists of a website and mobile application targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour. The intervention has a duration of five weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • sedentary behaviour
  • type 2 diabetes
  • eHealth
  • mHealth
  • self-regulation
  • behaviour change techniques
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Reclassified

10,371 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,406 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 80 across 8,350 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

University Ghent is the lead sponsor of 350 studies on the registry; 86 are open to participants now.

Compared within Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Chronic Disease. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Have access to internet
  • Being computer literate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not Dutch Speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Participants will receive the e- and mHealth intervention 'MyPlan 2.0'.

    Behavioral: MyPlan 2.0

  • No intervention
    Waiting-list control group

    Participants will not receive the e- and mHealth intervention 'MyPlan 2.0', but will be given access to the intervention after all testing phases.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMyPlan 2.0

    MyPlan 2.0 consists of five sessions. During these five sessions the following behaviour change techniques are used to motivate users to be more physically active or to sit less: exploring risk perceptions and perceived benefits, exploring social support, providing feedback, action planning, coping planning and monitoring.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in objective total, light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA)

    Change in amount of total, light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, measured via accelerometers

    Time frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

  2. Change in objective sedentary behaviour

    Change in amount of total sitting time, measured via accelerometers

    Time frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

  3. Change in self-reported total, light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA)

    Change in amount of total, light and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, measured via the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)

    Time frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

  4. Change in self-reported sedentary behaviour

    Change in amount of total sitting time, measured via the LASA sedentary behaviour self-report questionnaire

    Time frame: Pretest, posttest (6 weeks) and follow-up (6 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in self-efficacy

    Change in amount of self-efficacy to change behaviour, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)

  2. Change in outcome expectancies

    Outcome expectancies regarding the behaviour change, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)

  3. Change in risk perception

    Risk perception about the behaviour, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)

  4. Change in intention

    Amount of intention to change the behaviour, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)

  5. change in action planning

    Amount of action planning for behaviour change, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)

  6. change in coping planning

    Amount of coping planning for behaviour change, measured via 3 validated items (questionnaire)

    Time frame: Pretest, after week 1, after week 2, after week 3, after week 4, posttest (6 weeks), and follow-up (6 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Movement and Sports Sciences
    Ghent, 9000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Poppe L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Verloigne M, Shadid S, Van Cauwenberg J, Compernolle S, Crombez G. Efficacy of a Self-Regulation-Based Electronic and Mobile Health Intervention Targeting an Active Lifestyle in Adults Having Type 2 Diabetes and in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older: Two Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 2;21(8):e13363. doi: 10.2196/13363. PubMed 31376274 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Mar 2019, 16 months.

Of 2,066 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,243 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 11, 2017
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
StartActual
Oct 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
Mar 1, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 1, 2019
Last update
Dec 6, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03291171
Lead sponsor
University Ghent
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
Start date
Oct 15, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2019
Completion
Mar 1, 2019
Last update
Dec 6, 2021

Study contacts

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Professor
principal investigator · University Ghent
Geert Crombez, Professor
principal investigator · University Ghent
Maïté Verloigne, PostDoc
principal investigator · University Ghent

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion