CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03290781FIGARO UC 303Updated Jan 14, 2022Results posted

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Ontamalimab as Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ontamalimab and Placebo in Ulcerative Colitis, sponsored by Shire. Completed at 401 sites in 37 countries. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 81 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-14.

Sponsored by Shire · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
366
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 81 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ontamalimab as maintenance therapy treatment of remission, based on composite score of patient-reported symptoms and centrally read endoscopy, in participants with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

  • Ulcerative colitis
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 81 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants and/or their parent or legally authorized representative must have an understanding, ability, and willingness to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions.
  • Participants must be able to voluntarily provide written, signed, and dated (personally or via a legally authorized representative) informed consent and/or assent, as applicable, to participate in the study.
  • Participants must have completed the 12-week induction treatment period (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]).
  • Participants must have achieved clinical response in induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]). Clinical response is defined as:

    i) A decrease from the induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]) baseline in the composite score of patient reported symptoms using daily e-diary and centrally read endoscopy of at least 2 points and at least 30 percent (%), with an accompanying decrease in the sub score for rectal bleeding greater than or equal to (>=) 1 point or a sub score for rectal bleeding less than or equal to (\<=) 1 OR ii) A decrease from the induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]) baseline in total Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding sub score of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding sub score of 0 or 1.

For eligibility assessment, clinical response will be determined based on the centrally read endoscopy performed during screening and at Week 12 of induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]).

  • Participants receiving any treatment(s) for ulcerative colitis (UC) are eligible provided they have been, and are anticipated to be, on a stable dose for the designated period of time.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who had major protocol deviation(s) (as determined by the sponsor) in induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]).
  • Participants who permanently discontinued investigational product because of an adverse event (AE), regardless of relatedness to investigational product, in induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]).
  • Participants who are likely to require surgery for UC during the study period.
  • Participants are females who became pregnant during induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]), females who are planning to become pregnant during the study period, or males or females of childbearing potential not agreeing to continue using appropriate contraception methods (that is [i.e,] highly effective methods for female and medically appropriate methods for male study participants) through the conclusion of study participation.
  • Participants who do not agree to postpone donation of any organ or tissue, including male participants who are planning to bank or donate sperm and female participants who are planning to harvest or donate eggs, for the duration of the study and through 16 weeks after last dose of investigational product.
  • Participants who, in the opinion of the investigator or the sponsor, will be uncooperative or unable to comply with study procedures.
  • Participants who have a newly diagnosed malignancy or recurrence of malignancy (other than resected cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence).
  • Participants who have developed any major illness/condition or evidence of an unstable clinical condition (example [eg], renal, hepatic, hematologic, gastrointestinal (except disease under study), endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunologic [eg, Felty's syndrome], or local active infection/infectious illness) that, in the investigator's judgment, will substantially increase the risk to the participant if he or she participates in the study.
  • Participants with any other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory or electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of study results and, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the participant inappropriate for entry into this study.
  • Participants with known exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) since testing at screening in induction study (SHP647-301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]) and who are without a generally accepted course of treatment.
  • Participants who are investigational site staff members or relatives of those site staff members or participants who are sponsor employees directly involved in the conduct of the study.
  • Participants who are participating in or plan to participate in other investigational studies (other than induction study SHP647- 301 [NCT03259334] and SHP647-302 [NCT03259308]) during study SHP647-303 [NCT03290781].
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
366 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ontamalimab 25 mg

    Participants will receive 25 milligram (mg) of ontamalimab or placebo and achieved a clinical response in one of the induction studies (SHP647-301 \[NCT03259334\] and SHP647-302 \[NCT03259308\]) will receive 25 mg of ontamalimab as maintenance treatment subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe once in every 4 weeks (Q4W) up to Week 52.

    Drug: Ontamalimab

  • Experimental
    Ontamalimab 75 mg

    Participants will receive 75 mg of ontamalimab or placebo and achieved a clinical response in one of the induction studies (SHP647-301 \[NCT03259334\] and SHP647-302 \[NCT03259308\]) will receive 75 mg of ontamalimab as maintenance treatment subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe Q4W up to Week 52.

    Drug: Ontamalimab

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will receive 25 mg or 75 mg ontamalimab or placebo matched to ontamalimab in the induction studies (SHP647-301 \[NCT03259334\] and SHP647-302 \[NCT03259308\]) will receive placebo matched to ontamalimab as maintenance treatment subcutaneously using a prefilled syringe Q4W up to Week 52.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOntamalimab

    Participants will receive 1 milliliter (mL) of ontamalimab sterile aqueous buffered solution at an appropriate oncentration to provide an intended dose of drug (25 or 75 mg).

    Also known as: PF-00547659, SHP647

  • OtherPlacebo

    Participants will receive 1 mL of sterile aqueous buffered solution.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Composite Score at Week 52

    Remission: a composite score of participant reported symptoms using daily e-diary and centrally read endoscopy as follows: stool frequency sub-score 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline; and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0; and endoscopic sub-score 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The composite score was a recommended measure consisted of Mayo score without the Physician global assessment (PGA) sub-score and ranges from 0-9 points. The Mayo score was a measure of UC disease activity ranged from 0-12 points and consisted of 4 sub-scores, each graded from 0-3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Sub-scores were rectal bleeding (range: 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0-3, where 0= normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA sub-score (range: 0-3- higher score= severe disease), and an endoscopic sub-score (range: 0-3, where 0= normal/inactive disease; 3= severe disease).

    Time frame: At Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 52

    Endoscopic remission was defined by centrally read endoscopic sub-score 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The centrally read endoscopic sub-score of mayo score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease; 3=severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

    Time frame: At Week 52

  2. Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52

    Clinical remission was defined by stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline in stool frequency sub-score, and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Rectal bleeding was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: no blood seen, 1: streaks of blood with stool less than half time, 2: obvious blood or streaks of blood with stool most of the time, and 3: blood alone passes. Stool frequency was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: normal number of stools for this participant, 1: 1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2: 3 to 4 stools more than normal, and 3: 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  3. Number of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 52

    Sustained remission was defined as in remission at Week 52 visit, among participants who were in remission at the time of baseline. Remission was defined as a stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline in stool frequency sub-score and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0 and endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). Sub-scores were rectal bleeding (range: 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0-3, where 0= normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal), and an endoscopic sub-score (range: 0-3, where 0= normal/inactive disease; 3= severe disease).

    Time frame: At Week 52

  4. Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Composite Score at Week 52

    Clinical response was defined as a decrease from induction study baseline in the composite score of subject reported symptoms using daily e-diary and centrally read endoscopy of at least 2 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the sub-score for rectal bleeding \>=1 point or a sub-score for rectal bleeding \<= 1. Composite score consisted of Mayo score without the PGA sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points. Mayo score was a measure of UC disease activity, ranged from 0 -12 points and consisted of 4 sub-scores, each graded from 0 -3, higher scores indicating more severe disease. The rectal bleeding sub-scores ranges from 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes and centrally read endoscopic sub-score ranges from 0-3, where 0= normal/inactive disease; 3= severe disease.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  5. Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing Based on Endoscopic and Histologic Assessment at Week 52

    Mucosal healing was defined by centrally read endoscopic sub-score 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability) and centrally read Geboes score of \<=2. The centrally read endoscopic sub-score of mayo score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Geboes score grading system, was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicates more severe disease.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  6. Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52

    Glucocorticoid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in addition to not requiring any treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 52 visit among participants using glucocorticoids at the baseline. Clinical remission was defined as stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline in stool frequency sub-score, and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0, at the Week 52 visit. The stool frequency sub-score ranges from 0-3, where 0= normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal and rectal bleeding sub-score ranges from 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes).

    Time frame: At Week 52

  7. Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Remission at Week 52

    Glucocorticoid-free remission was defined as remission in addition to not requiring any treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 52 visit, among participants using glucocorticoids at the baseline. Remission was defined as a composite score of participant-reported symptoms using daily e-diary and endoscopy, with stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline, and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0, and endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The composite score was a recommended measure consisting of the Mayo score without the PGA sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points. The stool frequency sub-score, rectal bleeding sub-score and endoscopic sub-score of mayo score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  8. Number of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 52

    Remission defined as a total mayo score of less than or equal to (\<=) 2 with no individual sub-score (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy \[modified, excludes friability\], and physician's global assessment) exceeding 1. The total mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consisted of the following 4 sub-scores, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease: Sub-scores were rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen and 3=blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA sub-score (range: 0 to 3-higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic sub-score (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\].

    Time frame: At Week 52

  9. Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Both Rectal Bleeding and Stool Frequency Sub-scores of 0

    Clinical remission was defined as both rectal bleeding and stool frequency sub-scores of 0. Rectal bleeding was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: no blood seen, 1: streaks of blood with stool less than half time, 2: obvious blood or streaks of blood with stool most of the time, and 3: blood alone passes. Stool frequency was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: normal number of stools for this participant, 1: 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2: 3 to 4 stools more than normal, and 3: 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

    Time frame: At Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52

  10. Number of Participants With Sustained Endoscopic Remission at Week 52

    Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as in endoscopic remission at Week 52 visit among participants who were in endoscopic remission at the time of baseline. Endoscopic remission was defined as a centrally read endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The centrally read endoscopic sub-score range from 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease; 3=severe disease.

    Time frame: At Week 52

  11. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are defined as AEs with start dates at the time of or following the first exposure to investigational product. Number of participants with TEAEs were reported.

    Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 64)

  12. Number of Participants Who Developed Positive Antidrug Antibodies to Ontamalimab

    Antibody testing was conducted using an electro chemiluminescent signal method. Serum samples was analyzed for presence of antidrug antibodies to ontamalimab. Number of participants who developed positive results for ontamalimab were reported.

    Time frame: At Week 12, 24, 36 and 52

06

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2022

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 400 sites from 4 April 2018 (first participant first visit) to 1 July 2021 (last participant last visit). A total of 366 participants were enrolled, randomized and received study treatment.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mg
Started73718682112221
Completed2453305961917
Not completed49185623534
Withdrew: Adverse event5741000
Withdrew: Death0010100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject65910120
Withdrew: Physician decision0100000
Withdrew: Site terminated by sponsor1021000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0001000
Withdrew: Protocol deviation2001000
Withdrew: Disease relapse325387314
Withdrew: Other3022000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Remission Based on Composite Score at Week 52

Remission: a composite score of participant reported symptoms using daily e-diary and centrally read endoscopy as follows: stool frequency sub-score 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline; and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0; and endoscopic sub-score 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The composite score was a recommended measure consisted of Mayo score without the Physician global assessment (PGA) sub-score and ranges from 0-9 points. The Mayo score was a measure of UC disease activity ranged from 0-12 points and consisted of 4 sub-scores, each graded from 0-3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Sub-scores were rectal bleeding (range: 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0-3, where 0= normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA sub-score (range: 0-3- higher score= severe disease), and an endoscopic sub-score (range: 0-3, where 0= normal/inactive disease; 3= severe disease).

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Composite Score at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25 mg/ PlaceboONTA 25 mg/ONTA 25 mgONTA 75 mg/PlaceboONTA 75 mg/ONTA 75 mg
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Composite Score at Week 526381133
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25 mg/ Placebo vs ONTA 25 mg/ONTA 25 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.451 · 95% CI 0.296 to 0.572
  • ONTA 75 mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75 mg/ONTA 75 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.278 · 95% CI 0.142 to 0.401
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 52

Endoscopic remission was defined by centrally read endoscopic sub-score 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The centrally read endoscopic sub-score of mayo score ranged from 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease; 3=severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 527401340
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.463 · 95% CI 0.310 to 0.585
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.339 · 95% CI 0.197 to 0.463
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52

Clinical remission was defined by stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline in stool frequency sub-score, and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Rectal bleeding was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: no blood seen, 1: streaks of blood with stool less than half time, 2: obvious blood or streaks of blood with stool most of the time, and 3: blood alone passes. Stool frequency was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: normal number of stools for this participant, 1: 1 to 2 stools more than normal; 2: 3 to 4 stools more than normal, and 3: 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 5213481942
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.497 · 95% CI 0.337 to 0.620
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.294 · 95% CI 0.148 to 0.425
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 52

Sustained remission was defined as in remission at Week 52 visit, among participants who were in remission at the time of baseline. Remission was defined as a stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline in stool frequency sub-score and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0 and endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). Sub-scores were rectal bleeding (range: 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0-3, where 0= normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal), and an endoscopic sub-score (range: 0-3, where 0= normal/inactive disease; 3= severe disease).

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Sustained Remission at Week 52423722
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.277 · 95% CI 0.129 to 0.398
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.191 · 95% CI 0.067 to 0.305
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Composite Score at Week 52

Clinical response was defined as a decrease from induction study baseline in the composite score of subject reported symptoms using daily e-diary and centrally read endoscopy of at least 2 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the sub-score for rectal bleeding \>=1 point or a sub-score for rectal bleeding \<= 1. Composite score consisted of Mayo score without the PGA sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points. Mayo score was a measure of UC disease activity, ranged from 0 -12 points and consisted of 4 sub-scores, each graded from 0 -3, higher scores indicating more severe disease. The rectal bleeding sub-scores ranges from 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes and centrally read endoscopic sub-score ranges from 0-3, where 0= normal/inactive disease; 3= severe disease.

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Composite Score at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Composite Score at Week 5215492047
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.488 · 95% CI 0.329 to 0.613
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.343 · 95% CI 0.194 to 0.471
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Mucosal Healing Based on Endoscopic and Histologic Assessment at Week 52

Mucosal healing was defined by centrally read endoscopic sub-score 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability) and centrally read Geboes score of \<=2. The centrally read endoscopic sub-score of mayo score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Geboes score grading system, was a validated score for evaluating histologic disease activity in UC as follows: grade 0 = structural and architectural changes; grade 1 = chronic inflammatory infiltrate; grade 2 = lamina propria neutrophils and eosinophils; grade 3 = neutrophils in the epithelium; grade 4 = crypt destruction; grade 5 = erosions or ulceration. A higher Geboes score indicates more severe disease.

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing Based on Endoscopic and Histologic Assessment at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Mucosal Healing Based on Endoscopic and Histologic Assessment at Week 526371129
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.431 · 95% CI 0.280 to 0.554
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.227 · 95% CI 0.094 to 0.349
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52

Glucocorticoid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in addition to not requiring any treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 52 visit among participants using glucocorticoids at the baseline. Clinical remission was defined as stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline in stool frequency sub-score, and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0, at the Week 52 visit. The stool frequency sub-score ranges from 0-3, where 0= normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal and rectal bleeding sub-score ranges from 0-3, where 0= no blood \& 3=blood alone passes).

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Clinical Remission at Week 52112312
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.176 · 95% CI 0.049 to 0.287
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.005 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).) · Difference in proportion: 0.111 · 95% CI 0.006 to 0.208
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Remission at Week 52

Glucocorticoid-free remission was defined as remission in addition to not requiring any treatment with glucocorticoids for at least 4 weeks prior to the Week 52 visit, among participants using glucocorticoids at the baseline. Remission was defined as a composite score of participant-reported symptoms using daily e-diary and endoscopy, with stool frequency sub-score of 0 or 1 with at least a 1-point change from induction study baseline, and rectal bleeding sub-score of 0, and endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The composite score was a recommended measure consisting of the Mayo score without the PGA sub-score and ranges from 0 to 9 points. The stool frequency sub-score, rectal bleeding sub-score and endoscopic sub-score of mayo score ranges from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease.

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Remission at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Glucocorticoid-free Remission at Week 5208210
Statistical analysis
  • ONTA 25mg/Placebo vs ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.001 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647-303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).)
  • ONTA 75mg/Placebo vs ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = =0.005 (P-value was based on CMH chi-square test stratified by status of glucocorticoid use at SHP647- 303 baseline, prior anti-TNF treatment, and the degree of clinical response in the induction studies (whether remission is achieved or not).)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 52

Remission defined as a total mayo score of less than or equal to (\<=) 2 with no individual sub-score (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy \[modified, excludes friability\], and physician's global assessment) exceeding 1. The total mayo score ranges from 0 to 12 points and consisted of the following 4 sub-scores, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease: Sub-scores were rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0=no blood seen and 3=blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal number of stools and 3=at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA sub-score (range: 0 to 3-higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic sub-score (range: 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease; 3=severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\].

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Remission Based on Total Mayo Score at Week 525381033
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Both Rectal Bleeding and Stool Frequency Sub-scores of 0

Clinical remission was defined as both rectal bleeding and stool frequency sub-scores of 0. Rectal bleeding was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: no blood seen, 1: streaks of blood with stool less than half time, 2: obvious blood or streaks of blood with stool most of the time, and 3: blood alone passes. Stool frequency was assessed on a scale from 0-3, where 0: normal number of stools for this participant, 1: 1 to 2 stools more than normal, 2: 3 to 4 stools more than normal, and 3: 5 or more stools more than normal. Higher scores indicated more severe disease.

Time frame:
At Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Both Rectal Bleeding and Stool Frequency Sub-scores of 0
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
At Week 428252524
At Week 822252931
At Week 1218262230
At Week 1616321735
At Week 2020251631
At Week 2412311231
At Week 2813311932
At Week 3217351330
At Week 3613371332
At Week 4015341225
At Week 4411271233
At Week 4813321627
At Week 529331030
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sustained Endoscopic Remission at Week 52

Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as in endoscopic remission at Week 52 visit among participants who were in endoscopic remission at the time of baseline. Endoscopic remission was defined as a centrally read endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1 (modified, excludes friability). The centrally read endoscopic sub-score range from 0 to 3, where 0=normal or inactive disease; 3=severe disease.

Time frame:
At Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Sustained Endoscopic Remission at Week 52
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Sustained Endoscopic Remission at Week 52427829
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are defined as AEs with start dates at the time of or following the first exposure to investigational product. Number of participants with TEAEs were reported.

Time frame:
From start of study drug administration up to follow-up (Week 64)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mg
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)4641545181112
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Developed Positive Antidrug Antibodies to Ontamalimab

Antibody testing was conducted using an electro chemiluminescent signal method. Serum samples was analyzed for presence of antidrug antibodies to ontamalimab. Number of participants who developed positive results for ontamalimab were reported.

Time frame:
At Week 12, 24, 36 and 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Developed Positive Antidrug Antibodies to Ontamalimab
ParticipantsONTA 25mg/PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mg
At Week 127684204
At Week 246554101
At Week 365324212
At Week 521264111

Adverse events

Collected over From start of study drug administration up to Week 64. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ONTA 25mg/ Placebo0/73 (0%)6/73 (8.2%)41/73 (56.2%)
ONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mg0/71 (0%)9/71 (12.7%)27/71 (38%)
ONTA 75mg/Placebo1/86 (1.2%)9/86 (10.5%)52/86 (60.5%)
ONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mg0/82 (0%)2/82 (2.4%)30/82 (36.6%)
Placebo/Placebo1/11 (9.1%)1/11 (9.1%)8/11 (72.7%)
Placebo/ONTA 25mg0/22 (0%)0/22 (0%)11/22 (50%)
Placebo/ONTA 75mg0/21 (0%)2/21 (9.5%)9/21 (42.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent serious events
EventONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mg
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/730/710/860/821/110/220/21
Large intestine perforationGastrointestinal disorders1/730/710/860/821/110/220/21
PeritonitisInfections and infestations1/730/710/860/821/110/220/21
SepsisInfections and infestations0/730/711/860/821/110/220/21
Joint injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/730/710/860/820/110/221/21
Uterine polypReproductive system and breast disorders0/730/710/860/820/110/221/21
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders2/731/711/860/820/110/220/21
Chest discomfortGeneral disorders0/731/710/860/820/110/220/21
Drug hypersensitivityImmune system disorders0/731/710/860/820/110/220/21
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/731/710/860/820/110/220/21
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mg
Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders17/733/7129/866/824/110/221/21
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations4/733/713/866/822/111/221/21
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/734/713/863/820/111/223/21
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/733/710/863/821/113/221/21
Corona virus infectionInfections and infestations0/730/711/860/821/111/222/21
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/734/713/861/821/110/220/21
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/730/711/861/821/110/220/21
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/730/710/860/821/110/220/21
ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders0/730/710/860/821/110/220/21
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders3/732/714/863/821/110/220/21

Baseline characteristics

The safety set consisted of all participants who had received at least 1 dose of Investigational Product (IP) in this study, regardless of treatment received during the induction studies (SHP647-301 \[NCT03259334\] and SHP647-302 \[NCT03259308\]).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)ONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mgTotal
Mean43.3 ± 15.4041.2 ± 13.1742.0 ± 13.8142.3 ± 14.2144.7 ± 14.1640.9 ± 9.4239.9 ± 12.1042.1 ± 13.75
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mgTotal
Female272935355910150
Male4642514761311216
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino664703127
Not Hispanic or Latino67648274111920337
Unknown or Not Reported01010002
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ONTA 25mg/ PlaceboONTA 25mg/ONTA 25mgONTA 75mg/PlaceboONTA 75mg/ONTA 75mgPlacebo/PlaceboPlacebo/ONTA 25mgPlacebo/ONTA 75mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native20110004
Asian545812328
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander10000001
Black or African American31220019
White58627769101917312
More than one race42000107
Unknown or Not Reported02120005
07

Study locations

401 sites
  • Arizona Digestive Health Mesa - East
    Mesa, Arizona 85206, United States
  • Elite Clinical Studies - Phoenix - Clinedge - PPDS
    Phoenix, Arizona 85018, United States
  • Atria Clinical Research - Clinedge - PPDS
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72209, United States
  • Advanced Research Center
    Anaheim, California 92805, United States
  • Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC
    Corona, California 92879, United States
  • United Medical Doctors
    Encinitas, California 92024-1350, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • OM Research LLC - Lancaster - ClinEdge - PPDS
    Lancaster, California 93534, United States
  • VA Long Beach Healthcare System - NAVREF - PPDS
    Long Beach, California 90822, United States
  • Facey Medical Foundation
    Mission Hills, California 91345, United States
  • United Medical Doctors
    Murrieta, California 92563, United States
  • Alliance Clinical Research-(Vestavia Hills)
    Poway, California 92064, United States
  • Inland Empire Liver Foundation
    Rialto, California 92377, United States
  • University of California San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • Care Access Research, San Pablo
    San Pablo, California 94806, United States
  • Peak Gastroenterology Associates
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903, United States
  • Asthma and Allergy Associates PC - CRN - PPDS
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907, United States
  • Renaissance Research Medical Group, INC
    Cape Coral, Florida 33991, United States
  • Gastro Florida
    Clearwater, Florida 33756, United States
  • Advanced Clinical Research Network
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Alliance Medical Research LLC
    Coral Springs, Florida 33071, United States
  • ENCORE Borland-Groover Clinical Research - ERN - PPDS
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • SIH Research
    Kissimmee, Florida 34741, United States
  • Crystal Biomedical Research
    Miami Lakes, Florida 33065, United States
  • Hi Tech and Global Research, LLc
    Miami, Florida 33135, United States
  • Nuren Medical and Research Center
    Miami, Florida 33144, United States
  • Sanchez Clinical Research, Inc
    Miami, Florida 33157, United States
  • Gastroenterology Group of Naples
    Naples, Florida 34102, United States
  • Pharma Research International Inc
    Naples, Florida 34102, United States
  • Omega Research Consultants LLC - Clinedge - PPDS
    Orlando, Florida 32810, United States
  • Accel Research Sites - St. Petersburg - ERN - PPDS
    Pinellas Park, Florida 33781, United States
  • BRCR Medical Center, Inc
    Plantation, Florida 33322, United States
  • East Coast Institute for Research, LLC
    Saint Augustine, Florida 32086, United States
  • DBC Research
    Tamarac, Florida 33321, United States
  • Bayside Clinical Research - New Port Richey
    Tampa, Florida 33604, United States
  • Atlanta Gastroenterology Specialists, PC
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Infinite Clinical Trials
    Atlanta, Georgia 30349, United States
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases, Inc Research - IACT- HyperCore - PPDS
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Atlanta Center For Gastroenterology PC
    Decatur, Georgia 30033, United States
  • Loretto Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60644, United States
  • IL Gastroenterology Group
    Gurnee, Illinois 60031, United States
  • Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital - NAVREF - PPDS
    Hines, Illinois 60141, United States
  • Dupage Medical Group
    Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181, United States
  • Medisphere Medical Research Center LLC
    Evansville, Indiana 47714, United States
  • Laporte County Institute For Clinical Research
    Michigan City, Indiana 46360, United States
  • Gastroenterology Associates of Hazard
    Hazard, Kentucky 41701, United States
  • CroNOLA, LLC.
    Houma, Louisiana 70360, United States
  • Clinical Trials of SWLA, LLC
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601, United States
  • Louisiana Research Center LLC
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Chevy Chase Clinical Research
    Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, United States
  • Commonwealth Clinical Studies LLC
    Brockton, Massachusetts 02302, United States
  • UMass Memorial Medical Center
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Clinical Research Institute of Michigan
    Chesterfield, Michigan 48047, United States
  • National Clinical, LLC
    Hamtramck, Michigan 48212, United States
  • Mayo Clinic Health System - PPDS
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • Digestive Health Center PA
    Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • St Louis Center For Clinical Research
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63128, United States
  • Advanced Biomedical Research of America
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89123, United States
  • Encompass Care
    North Las Vegas, Nevada 89086, United States
  • New York Total Medical Care PC
    Brooklyn, New York 11215, United States
  • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Southtowns Gastroenterology, PLLC
    Orchard Park, New York 14127, United States
  • East Carolina Gastroenterology
    Jacksonville, North Carolina 28546, United States
  • Piedmont Healthcare
    Statesville, North Carolina 28625, United States
  • Consultants For Clinical Research Inc
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • Consultants For Clinical Research Inc
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45249, United States
  • Consultants For Clinical Research Inc
    Fairfield, Ohio 45014, United States
  • Prestige Clinical Research
    Franklin, Ohio 45005, United States
  • Ohio Clinical Research Partners LLC
    Mentor, Ohio 44060, United States
  • Veteran's Research and Education Foundation - NAVREF - PPDS
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Veterans Research Foundation of Pittsburgh - NAVREF - PPDS
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, United States
  • Digestive Disease Associates
    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania 19610, United States
  • Gastro One
    Germantown, Tennessee 38138, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States
  • Advanced Gastroenterology-Union City
    Union City, Tennessee 38237, United States
  • Inquest Clinical Research/Coastal Gastroenterology Associates, PA - TDDC - PPDS
    Baytown, Texas 77521, United States
  • Northside Gastroenterology
    Cypress, Texas 77429, United States
  • Digestive Health Associates of Texas, P.A.dba DHAT Research Institute
    Garland, Texas 75044, United States
  • Precision Research Institute, LLC
    Houston, Texas 77039, United States
  • Biopharma Informatic Inc.
    Houston, Texas 77043, United States
  • Southwest Clinical Trials
    Houston, Texas 77074, United States
  • Aztec Medical Research
    Houston, Texas 77079, United States
  • BI Research Center
    Houston, Texas 77084, United States
  • Southern Star Research Institute LLC
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • DM Clinical Research - ERN - PPDS
    Tomball, Texas 77375, United States
  • HP Clinical Research
    Bountiful, Utah 84010, United States
  • Mid Atlantic Health Specialists
    Galax, Virginia 24333, United States
  • Winchester Gastroenterology Associates
    Winchester, Virginia 22601-2872, United States
  • CHI Franciscan Digestive Care Associates
    Tacoma, Washington 98405, United States
  • Exemplar Research, Inc. - Elkins
    Elkins, West Virginia 26241, United States
  • West Virginia University Hospital
    Morgantown, West Virginia 26506, United States
  • Fundación Favaloro
    Buenos Aires, C1093AAS, Argentina
  • Hospital Privado Centro Médico de Córdoba
    Córdoba, Argentina
  • Sanatorio 9 de Julio SA
    San Miguel De Tucumán, Argentina
  • Concord Repatriation General Hospital
    Concord, New South Wales 2139, Australia
  • Liverpool Hospital
    Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
    Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia

Showing the first 100 of 401 sites across 37 countries.

08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 17, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 23, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03290781
Lead sponsor
Shire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2017
Start date
Apr 4, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2021
Completion
Jul 1, 2021
Results posted
Jan 14, 2022
Last update
Jan 14, 2022

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Shire

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion