CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03288285Updated Apr 23, 2019

Comparison of Post- and Pre-dilutional Hemodiafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients

An observational study in Hemodiafiltration, sponsored by Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-23.

Sponsored by Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
49
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a choice of treatment modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease. Hemodiafiltration, combining diffusion and convection, may increase removal of large and middle molecule uremic toxins comparing to conventional hemodialysis. The techniques of hemodiafiltration include pre-dilution and post-dilution according to the infusion site of substitution fluid. Post-dilution HDF is most widely used because of higher removal rate of uremic toxins. However, hemoconcentration and clotting of membrane limit its further clearance of toxins. Pre-dilution may preserve membrane permeability and maintain hemodynamic status. Although lower clearance of small molecule uremic toxins, one study in Japan showed survival benefits of pre-dilution HDF, comparing to post-dilution HDF. The aim of this study was to compare pre-dilution and post-dilution HDF in terms of their clinical and biological parameters and clearance of uremic toxins by using cross-over study design.

Read the detailed description
  1. Study design: randomly assigned, cross-over study.
  2. Patient number: 60.
  3. Inclusion criteria: stable patients end-stage renal disease who were older than 20 years and received thrice-weekly standard hemodialysis for more than 3 months were recruited.
  4. Exclusion criteria: active systemic disease, liver cirrhosis, active malignancy, receiving immunosuppressive treatment, dialysis with temporal non-tunneled catheter, inadequate dialysis dose (single-pooled Kt/V\<1.2).
  5. Methods:

    Prior to randomization, a Charlson Comorbidity Index score and baseline characteristics are recorded for each patient. Each patient who received HDF prior to study will received one-month high-flux hemodialysis with target single-pooled Kt/V>1.2 for washout. The baseline characteristics of each patient including dialyzer, dialysis time, blood flow, dialysate flow, replacement volume, pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure and body weight were recorded. The follow-up laboratory data will also be collected: predialysis C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, uric acid, albumin, calcium, phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone, β2-microglobulin, prolactin, fibroblast growth factor 23, α1-microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, p-cresol sulfate, advance oxidation protein products, advance glycation product, percentage of proinflammatory monocytes; interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, hematocrit, transferrin saturation and ferritin. Urea kinetics including kt/V, Urea reduction ratio and normalized protein catabolic rate are calculated. We also used Physical Symptoms Distress Scale for life quality measurement.

    After randomization, two group received standard prescription of pre- and post-dilution HDF. The prescribed convective volume per treatment of post-dilution mode is based on blood flow, filtration fraction and hematocrit to achieved current recommendation of 23 liter/1.73m2. The convective volume of pre-dilution mode will be at least twice higher than the desired dose in post-dilution mode for each patient. After 3-month stable hemodiafiltration, parameters mentioned above will also be checked. Two group will be switched for another 3-month course and then switch again. The total following time is 12 months.

  6. Outcome: The primary objective is to compare the removal of a wide spectrum of solutes such as middle and protein-bound molecules. Secondary outcomes are intradialytic tolerance, including intradialytic hypotension, cramps and arrhythmia, and life quality measurements.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hemodiafiltration

Keywords

  • hemodiafiltration
  • pre-dilution
  • post-dilution
  • uremic toxins
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

hemodialysis (HD) patients

Inclusion criteria

  • stable patients end-stage renal disease who were older than 20 years and received thrice-weekly standard hemodialysis for more than 3 months were recruited.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active systemic disease, liver cirrhosis, malignancy, receiving immunosuppressive treatment, dialysis with temporal non-tunneled catheter, inadequate dialysis dose (kt/V\<1.2).
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Removal of a wide spectrum of solutes

    The primary objective is to compare the removal of a wide spectrum of solutes such as middle and protein-bound molecules

    Time frame: 1 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intradialytic tolerance

    intradialytic tolerance including symptomatic hypotension, cramps, headache, nutrition, and inflammatory status.

    Time frame: 1 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital
    Taichung, Taiwan
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03288285
Lead sponsor
Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 20, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2018
Completion
Apr 7, 2019
Last update
Apr 23, 2019

Study contacts

Chang-Hsu Chen, MD
principal investigator · Tungs' Taichung Metroharbour Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion