CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03283514Updated Sep 14, 2017

Esthetic Expectations of Edentulous Patients Followed in a French Dental Clinic

An observational study in Complete Edentulism, sponsored by Hôpital Rothschild. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-14.

Sponsored by Hôpital Rothschild · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Esthetic is a major factor in complete denture (CD) success. Patient involvement in esthetic project plays a crucial role in denture acceptance and patient satisfaction. Historically, teeth choice and arrangement were made according to Frush and Ficher's recommendations focusing on natural looking of esthetics. Dentists may also propose to restore the dentate state looking for denture when preextraction data are available. Recently, a patient-centered approach based on attractivity has been proposed and may lead to in an appearance transcending the laws of nature.

The aim of the present study was to investigate actual denture esthetic expectations in a French edentate population followed in a university dental clinic (Rothschild Hospital , AP-HP).

Read the detailed description

Inclusion criteria : being currently edentulous within at least within the maxillary arch, literate French speakers, willing and able to complete the survey in a single sitting. Clinical data collection was made by a unique examiner and concerned length of edentulism, antagonist arch, existence of preextraction data, smile attractivity opinion. The respondents completed a questionnaire identifying their age, sex, educational and income level. Patients were also asked for their denture look preference among 4 esthetic projects: 1) restoring pre-extraction (dentate) looking, 2) restoring actual denture looking, 3) creating natural looking, 4) creating perfect looking, 5) no opinion. Each project was explained similarly by the same examiner. Statistical analysis using a Pearson Chi-squared test at a 0.05 level of significance was conducted for associations between esthetic projects preference and tested variables.

02

Conditions studied

  • Complete Edentulism

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Totally edentulous subjects (20 women, 22 men, mena aged: 67.9 ± 12.2 years) attending maxillary CD in the department of prosthodontics of the Hopital Rothschild (AP-HP) are concerned by recruitment and are proposed to participate.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria : Currently edentulous maxillary arch, literate French speakers, willing and able to complete the survey in a single sitting. Inclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria: Aged under 18 years.

04

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherComplete denture

    questionnaire

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. esthetic preferred project

    Patients were asked for their denture-looking expectations among 4 esthetic projects: 1) restoring pre-extraction dentate looking, 2) restoring actual denture looking, 3) creating natural looking, 4) creating perfect looking, 5) no opinion.

    Time frame: Esthetic expectation evaluated at date of inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. age

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying their age (in years)

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

  2. gender

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying their gender (man or woman)

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

  3. educational level

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying their educational level : last degree (no degree at al, French General Certificate Secondary Education, High School Diploma, Vocational Training Certificate taken at Secondary School, university degree)

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

  4. month income level,

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying their income level each month : in euros

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

  5. length of edentulism,

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying the duration of edentulism (in years)

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

  6. smile attractivity opinion

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying their smile attractivity opinion Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying the most attractive smile among 4 esthetic situations : preextraction-looking smile, denture-like smile, natural-like smile, perfect smile.

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

  7. preextraction data available

    Respondents completed a questionnaire identifying the existence of preextraction data available (available or not available)

    Time frame: evaluated at date of inclusion

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03283514
Lead sponsor
Hôpital Rothschild
Responsible party
Dr Braud Adeline (maitre de conférences -praticien hospitalier, Hôpital Rothschild) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2017
Completion
Sep 1, 2017
Last update
Sep 14, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion