CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03283241Updated Mar 22, 2022Results posted

Zolidd One ExHex Dental Implant Compared to Uncoated One ExHex Dental Implant in Subjects With Partial Edentulism

An interventional study of Zolidd One ExHex and One ExHex in Partial Edentulism, sponsored by Addbio AB. Completed at 3 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-22.

Sponsored by Addbio AB · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A randomised, multicentre, double blind, parallel group comparative investigation where subjects will be randomised to receive coated or uncoated implants

Read the detailed description

The study will consist of two parts. Part I, is the main study ending when all subjects have reached visit 5. The study will be evaluated and Clinical Study Report (CSR) will be written for this part.

Part II, of the study is a post-follow up study starting when the first subject has completed visit 5. There will be a separate CSR written for Study Part II.

The study Part I will begin with a baseline visit, visit 1, Informed consent procedure will take place. Provided the subject will give informed consent for both Study Part I and Study Part II the screening procedure starts. Subjects will undergo all screening and baseline assessment procedures including assessments of dental status to determine number of implants needed. Subjects who meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be given a date for implant surgery within three weeks. The required number of implants will be ordered from the Study Distributor.

At the implantation day, visit 2, eligibility will be re-checked before the surgery procedures starts. The subjects who still are eligible will enter the treatment and the implantation surgery is conducted. The first follow-up visit after implantation will take place week 2 post-surgery and the last follow-up visit in Study Part I will be at week 12. Any post-surgical complications and adverse events will be collected and recorded in the eCRF. On demand, depending on the outcome of the surgery, additional visits might occur.

Study Part II, the Post Follow-up Study, consist of two visits, one at month 12 and another visit at month 24 post-surgery. Post-surgical complications and adverse events from Study Part I will be followed-up if not resolved previously. Safety, survival rate and marginal bone loss will be assessed and outcome recorded in the eCRF. Additional visits might occur depending on the status of the subjects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Partial Edentulism
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged >18 years
  • Subjects should be willing to take part, able to understand the information given to them, and give written consent
  • Subject diagnosed with partial edentulism and who needs at least one dental implant in the posterior upper jaw i.e. premolars to first molar. The same subject may also need implants in the posterior mandible (premolars to first molar region)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected to be immunocompromised or are taking immunosuppressant
  • Current participation in another clinical investigation or participation within the last 6 months
  • Known sensitivity/allergies to any of the test materials or any of their ingredients, such as bisphosphonate, titanium or human fibrinogen
  • Significant current or past medical history of hepatic, renal, cardiac, pulmonary, digestive, haematological, neurological, or psychiatric disease, hypercalcaemia, previous or ongoing malignancy in the head and neck region or uncontrolled diabetes type I which in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the safety of the subject or affect the outcome of the investigation
  • Pregnant and lactating females or those actively seeking to become pregnant in the next 3 months
  • Previous (last 5 years) or on-going Bisphosphonate or Denosumab treatment
  • Significant marginal bone loss prior to implant insertion requiring bone grafting or bone graft substitute
  • Subject with extraction(s) performed in the position of implant placement within the last 2 months
  • Subject with need of >6 implants or a full bridge
  • The final prosthetic construction in need of support from neighbouring teeth
  • Known drug or alcohol abuse
  • Subjects only needed implant(s) in the posterior mandible region
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Zolidd One ExHex

    Coated titanium implant

    Device: Zolidd One ExHex · Device: One ExHex

  • Sham comparator
    One ExHex

    Uncoated titanium implant

    Device: Zolidd One ExHex · Device: One ExHex

Interventions

  • DeviceZolidd One ExHex

    Subject will be treated/implanted at visit 2, one of the implants will be chosen as the "index implant"and will be followed together with other implants (maximum 6 implant per subject) at week 8,12 and month 12 and 24.

  • DeviceOne ExHex

    Subject will be treated/implanted at visit 2, one of the implants will be chosen as the "index implant"and will be followed together with other implants (maximum 6 implant per subject) at week 8,12 and month 12 and 24.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Stability at 12 Weeks Minus Value at Baseline (Day 1) Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants Change in Stability From Day 1(Implantation to 12 Weeks After Implantation of the "Index Implant" Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants

    The primary objective is to compare the mean change in stability at 12 weeks minus value at baseline (day 1)after surgery of the "index implant" between coated and uncoated implants. An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used to measure the stability of the implant ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability The aim is to get as close to a 100 as possible

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. To Compare Absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Values Between Coated and Uncoated Implants for the "Index Implant" at Week 8 and Week 12

    To compare absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) highest values between coated and uncoated "index implants" at week 8 and week 12 after implantation An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used ISQ scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability Aim its to get close to 100

    Time frame: week 8 and week 12

  2. Incidence of Post-surgery Complications and Adverse Events

    To compare safety as assessed by complications post-surgery and any other adverse event up to week 12 between all coated and all uncoated implants

    Time frame: Day1 to week 12

  3. Change in ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for the "Index Implant"

    To compare change in stability from day 1 to week 8 between the coated and the uncoated "index implants" An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used to measure the stability of the implant ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability The aim is to get as close to a 100 as possible

    Time frame: Day 1 to week 8

  4. Change in ISQ Highest Value for All Other Implants

    To compare change in stability from day 1 to week 8 and 12 between all other coated and all other uncoated implants An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used ISQ scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability

    Time frame: week 8 and week 12

  5. Absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for All Other Implants

    To compare absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) highest value at week 8 and 12 between all other coated and all other uncoated implants An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used ISQ scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability

    Time frame: Week 8 and 12

  6. Change in Marginal Bone Height for All Other Implants

    To compare change in marginal bone height between all coated and all uncoated implants from at week 8 and 12 The marginal bone height is measured by x-ray and measuring the distance between the implant and bone in mm (millimeter)

    Time frame: week 8 and 12

  7. Post-surgical Complications and Other Adverse Events (AEs) for All Implants

    To compare safety as assessed by complications post-surgery and other adverse events up to month 24 post-implantation visit between all coated and all uncoated implants

    Time frame: month 24

  8. Survival Rate for All Implants

    To compare survival rate of implants up to 24 months between all coated and all uncoated implants

    Time frame: 24 months

  9. Change in Marginal Bone Height for All Implants

    To compare change in marginal bone height from day 1 to month 12 and 24 between all coated and all uncoated implants The marginal bone height is measured by x-ray and measuring the distance between the implant and bone in mm (millimeter)

    Time frame: Day 1, month 12 and 24

  10. Occurrence of Signs Associated With Peri-implantitis for All Implants

    To compare peri-implantitis frequency at 12 and 24 months between all coated and all uncoated implants Ocular assessment of redness and swelling this is an overall judgement of peri-implantitis

    Time frame: Month 12 and 24

06

Results

Posted Mar 22, 2022

Participant flow

Sixty two patient started the study

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Started3230
Completed 12 weeks2929
Completed2827
Not completed43
Withdrew: Adverse event41
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Subject relocated to finland01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Stability at 12 Weeks Minus Value at Baseline (Day 1) Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants Change in Stability From Day 1(Implantation to 12 Weeks After Implantation of the "Index Implant" Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants

The primary objective is to compare the mean change in stability at 12 weeks minus value at baseline (day 1)after surgery of the "index implant" between coated and uncoated implants. An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used to measure the stability of the implant ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability The aim is to get as close to a 100 as possible

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) score
Change in Stability at 12 Weeks Minus Value at Baseline (Day 1) Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants Change in Stability From Day 1(Implantation to 12 Weeks After Implantation of the "Index Implant" Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants
ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) scoreZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Change in Stability at 12 Weeks Minus Value at Baseline (Day 1) Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants Change in Stability From Day 1(Implantation to 12 Weeks After Implantation of the "Index Implant" Comparing Coated and Uncoated Implants7.47 ± 25.712.83 ± 16.71
SecondaryTo Compare Absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Values Between Coated and Uncoated Implants for the "Index Implant" at Week 8 and Week 12

To compare absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) highest values between coated and uncoated "index implants" at week 8 and week 12 after implantation An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used ISQ scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability Aim its to get close to 100

Time frame:
week 8 and week 12
Reported as:
Number · ISQ Score
To Compare Absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Values Between Coated and Uncoated Implants for the "Index Implant" at Week 8 and Week 12
ISQ ScoreZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
week 88385
week 128485
SecondaryIncidence of Post-surgery Complications and Adverse Events

To compare safety as assessed by complications post-surgery and any other adverse event up to week 12 between all coated and all uncoated implants

Time frame:
Day1 to week 12
Reported as:
Number · Number of events reported
Incidence of Post-surgery Complications and Adverse Events
Number of events reportedZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Incidence of Post-surgery Complications and Adverse Events54
SecondaryChange in ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for the "Index Implant"

To compare change in stability from day 1 to week 8 between the coated and the uncoated "index implants" An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used to measure the stability of the implant ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability The aim is to get as close to a 100 as possible

Time frame:
Day 1 to week 8
Reported as:
Mean · ISQ Score
Change in ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for the "Index Implant"
ISQ ScoreZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Change in ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for the "Index Implant"4.34 ± 10.831.38 ± 8.86
SecondaryChange in ISQ Highest Value for All Other Implants

To compare change in stability from day 1 to week 8 and 12 between all other coated and all other uncoated implants An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used ISQ scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability

Time frame:
week 8 and week 12
Reported as:
Mean · ISQ Score
Change in ISQ Highest Value for All Other Implants
ISQ ScoreZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
week 89.0 ± 21.65.1 ± 20.1
week 127.1 ± 22.23.7 ± 20.4
SecondaryAbsolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for All Other Implants

To compare absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) highest value at week 8 and 12 between all other coated and all other uncoated implants An ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) probe is used ISQ scale is 1-100 1 No stability 100 stability

Time frame:
Week 8 and 12
Reported as:
Number · ISQ Score
Absolute ISQ (Implant Stability Quotient) Highest Value for All Other Implants
ISQ ScoreZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
week 88385
week 128485
SecondaryChange in Marginal Bone Height for All Other Implants

To compare change in marginal bone height between all coated and all uncoated implants from at week 8 and 12 The marginal bone height is measured by x-ray and measuring the distance between the implant and bone in mm (millimeter)

Time frame:
week 8 and 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm(milimeter)
Change in Marginal Bone Height for All Other Implants
mm(milimeter)Zolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Week 8 Mesial0.3 ± 0.70.2 ± 0.5
Week 8 Distal0.4 ± 0.80.2 ± 0.4
Week 12 Mesial0.5 ± 0.50.4 ± 0.7
Week 12 Distal0.6 ± 1.00.4 ± 0.6
SecondaryPost-surgical Complications and Other Adverse Events (AEs) for All Implants

To compare safety as assessed by complications post-surgery and other adverse events up to month 24 post-implantation visit between all coated and all uncoated implants

Time frame:
month 24
Reported as:
Number · Number of events reported
Post-surgical Complications and Other Adverse Events (AEs) for All Implants
Number of events reportedZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Post-surgical Complications and Other Adverse Events (AEs) for All Implants41
SecondarySurvival Rate for All Implants

To compare survival rate of implants up to 24 months between all coated and all uncoated implants

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Mean · Number of implant loss
Survival Rate for All Implants
Number of implant lossZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Survival Rate for All Implants0.930 (0.824 to 0.973)0.939 (0.822 to 0.980)
SecondaryChange in Marginal Bone Height for All Implants

To compare change in marginal bone height from day 1 to month 12 and 24 between all coated and all uncoated implants The marginal bone height is measured by x-ray and measuring the distance between the implant and bone in mm (millimeter)

Time frame:
Day 1, month 12 and 24
Reported as:
Mean · mm(millimeter)
Change in Marginal Bone Height for All Implants
mm(millimeter)Zolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Week 12 Mesial0.5 ± 0.80.3 ± 0.6
Week 12 Distal0.5 ± 0.90.3 ± 0.6
Month 24 Mesial0.5 ± 1.00.5 ± 1.0
Month 24 Distal0.5 ± 1.00.5 ± 1.0
SecondaryOccurrence of Signs Associated With Peri-implantitis for All Implants

To compare peri-implantitis frequency at 12 and 24 months between all coated and all uncoated implants Ocular assessment of redness and swelling this is an overall judgement of peri-implantitis

Time frame:
Month 12 and 24
Reported as:
Number · number of participants redness/swollen
Occurrence of Signs Associated With Peri-implantitis for All Implants
number of participants redness/swollenZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
12 month00
24 month00

Adverse events

Collected over The adverse events were collected from visit 1 to 24 month. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Zolidd One ExHex0/32 (0%)1/32 (3.1%)7/32 (21.9%)
One ExHex0/30 (0%)1/30 (3.3%)5/30 (16.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Stress fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/321/30
Bipolar disorderPsychiatric disorders1/320/30
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventZolidd One ExHexOne ExHex
Device FailureProduct Issues7/324/30
Back panMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/321/30

Baseline characteristics

ITT population Zolidd One exHex 32 One ExHex 30

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Zolidd One ExHexOne ExHexTotal
Mean56.4 ± 14.060.7 ± 12.458.5 ± 13.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Zolidd One ExHexOne ExHexTotal
Female161531
Male161531
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Zolidd One ExHexOne ExHexTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Zolidd One ExHexOne ExHexTotal
Sweden323062
07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Dingletandläkarna
    Dingle, 45561, Sweden
  • Praktikertjänst AB Holmgatans Tandläkarmottagning
    Falun, 79171, Sweden
  • Käk-kirurgiska Kliniken, Näl
    Trollhättan, 46185, Sweden
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 14, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Not planned at the moment

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03283241
Lead sponsor
Addbio AB
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 14, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2020
Completion
Oct 1, 2020
Results posted
Mar 22, 2022
Last update
Mar 22, 2022

Study contacts

Christer Dahlin, DDS, PhD
principal investigator · Käk kirurgiska kliniken NÄL, Trollhättan, Sweden

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion