CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03281135Updated Sep 13, 2017

Optimizing Cervical Cancer Screening Modalities

An interventional study of HPV testing in Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Addis Ababa University. Status unknown. Open to female participants aged 30 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-13.

Sponsored by Addis Ababa University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,760
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 49 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This project aims to optimize cervical cancer screening adherence comparing Arm A (VIA) and Arm B self-sampled Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing and determine the molecular epidemiology of HPV, persistence level and identify factors responsible for persistence, and also characterizing the potential dysplasia by biomarkers that describe the disease stage in a population of Ethiopia.

A cluster-randomized trial will be used in this study. The total number of ten kebele's(Smallest administrative unit) will be randomly classified in to two arms(VIA and HPV+VIA).Community health workers will be used as a cluster for randomization. Community sensitization and awareness creation will be performed at health facilities and in communities at social, business or religious gatherings, about cervical cancer and its prevention for eligible women in both arms. Women will be educated about cervical cancer and advice for testing at the Hospital offering VIA (arm A). Women will also be instructed to undergo HPV self-sampling at nearby health posts with a vaginal evalyn brush (arm B). All eligible women on each cluster will be included in the study at both arms. Based on the community health workers number and structure study area there will be about 22 clusters with 80 eligible women on each cluster. Brushes will be sent to the Microbiology Laboratory of Department of Microbiology,Immunology and Parasitology,College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, where the laboratory service is sated-up . Trained Microbiologists will perform the laboratory analysis at the HPV laboratory. Only women with samples positive for high-risk HPV (hrHPV) will be contacted and informed to go to the Hospital offering VIA. Further tests will also be performed from the brushes at the collaborators' HPV laboratory, Germany to better characterize the dysplesia.

The women found positive for VIA or hrHPV+VIA will receive cryo treatment at Butajira Hospital. To evaluate the long-term effect and factors for persistence, all eligible women within the catchment area will be visited after 2 years door to-door and asked for a vaginal self-sample and HPV-genotype test. The impact of intervention, factors associated with HPV infection, persistence, clearance, and adherence to the screening service will be seen.

Read the detailed description

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide but the commonest in developing countries. In Ethiopia, cervical cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality from all cancers. The Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV) is a necessary cause for cervical cancer (CC). HPVs 16, 18, 31, 33, 35 and 39 are considered as high risk types which are mainly responsible in cervical carcinogenesis.

In developing countries, including Ethiopia, almost all women with cancers present to health care facilities at late stages with advanced disease and poor prognosis. Unlike other reproductive health cancers, cervical cancer can be prevented and even possible to be cured if identified in its early stages. Currently cervical cancer screening by visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and immediate treatment with cryotherapy is recommended by World Health Organization(WHO) for low and middle income countries as this method does not require especially trained professionals and more resources and results are available immediately which reduces the attrition rate. However, yet accessing VIA is difficult for many rural women as the service is only available at least at district Hospital level in very few places. Although VIA is accepted by the government in many low income countries, training , maintaining quality assurance, the invasiveness of a pelvic examination and user variability of the test remain critical barriers. Moreover, the short comings of this method includes having of low positive predictive value and lack of evidence on periodic screening performance.

Detection of High risk Human Papilloma Viruses (HrHPV) in the cervix has been recommended in settings wherever possible. World Health Organization (WHO) primarily recommends the HPV test which is very sensitive and a convenient molecular test for cervical cancer screening. This approach is found to be less examiner-dependent, reduce the burden in health system, enhance the accuracy, efficiency and reduce cultural barriers. Therefore, HPV test might be a future option in low and middle income countries.

In Ethiopia, screening with VIA followed by cryotherapy started in 2009 first for women with HIV in selected 14 hospitals and subsequently the service was expanded to 10 additional health institution. Currently the federal ministry of health in Ethiopia has scaled up the service to the general public into public health facilities. However, still majority of women in Ethiopia are residing in rural area where access to screening and treatment facilities is limited or lacking.

So far few studies have been conducted in African settings for assessing the uptake and acceptability of independent screening approaches. Study in Sub Saharan Africa reported higher acceptance of HPV based cervical cancer screening than visual inspection with acetic acid. In Ethiopia there is no adequate information on women uptake, acceptability, adherence and potential barriers of cervical cancer screening for different screening modalities. Moreover, data on HPV prevalence and genotype distribution are rare.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Cancer

Keywords

  • Cervical cancer screening
  • Adherance
  • HPV typing
  • HDSS
  • Ethiopia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 49 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged between 30 and 49

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women with History of hysterectomy or cervical cancer, pregnant women, not meet the eligibility criteria and unable to give consent.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,760 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    HPV testing

    This is an experimental arm for the primary outcome, 'adherence to the procedures'. In this group self sampling will be done using the Evalyn brush for HPV testing.

    Other: HPV testing

  • No intervention
    Standard care: VIA screening

    Control Arm, in which women's are invited to cervical cancer screening as per standard Ethiopian cervical cancer prevention and control guideline. Uptake of screening in this group will be compared with the HPV testing arm group to test for significant differences in adherence.

Interventions

  • OtherHPV testing

    Clusters randomly allocated to this arm of the study will be sensitized to be showed up in nearby health posts for self sampling with Evalyn brush for HPV testing.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence to the procedures

    Proportions of women who adhered in the screening and subsequent follow up based on HPV testing using self-sampling versus an offer of attending for a VIA. This will be compared based on: A women who accessed the HPV self sampling at health post and accessed VIA and treated for positive result plus untreated for negative result divided by the eligible women in the arm versus A women who accessed the VIA at health facility and treated for positive result plus untreated for negative result divided by the eligible women in the arm.

    Time frame: With in 1 year period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of women that participate in Cervical Cancer Screening in the control (VIA) compared with the number of women that participate in the intervention(Self sampling HPV testing)

    This will be measured based on the number of women who attended only the screening procedure after the first sensitization program

    Time frame: With in 1 year period

  2. Demographic and socio cultural factors associated with uptake and adherence of two different cervical cancer screening procedures

    Here we will try to identify and explore socio economic and cultural barriers related with each screening approach.

    Time frame: With in 1 year period

  3. HPV genotypes among rural women

    We will identify HPV genotypes from all collected samples of the study population. Samples will be collected from the community and analyzed centrally in Addis Ababa.

    Time frame: With in 1 year period

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Teka B, Gizaw M, Firdawoke E, Addissie A, Sisay TA, Schreckenberger C, Skof AS, Thies S, Mihret A, Kantelhardt EJ, Abebe T, Kaufmann AM. A Technical Comparison of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Assays from a Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in South Central Ethiopia. Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Jul 29;14:2253-2263. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S360712. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35937937 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — We will see

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03281135
Lead sponsor
Addis Ababa University
Collaborators
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Responsible party
Muluken Gizaw Turago (Assistant Professor, Addis Ababa University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2017
Start date
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2019 (estimated)
Completion
May 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 13, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion