ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03276936Updated Jan 18, 2022Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Topical Administration of FMX103 in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Papulopustular Rosacea

A Phase 3 interventional study of FMX103 1.5% in Papulopustular Rosacea, sponsored by Vyne Therapeutics Inc.. Completed at 79 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-18.

Sponsored by Vyne Therapeutics Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
504
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 145 studies in Rosacea with a site in United States — 8 open to participants now, 9 under way, none of them phase 3. Rosacea · United States.

Enrollment
18th of 137
504 · median 78
Started
2017
with 16 others
Phase 3
32 of 145
none open now
Registered
92nd of 145
by date

Among the 145 studies in Rosacea with a site in United States, this one is the 18th largest by enrollment of the 137 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 17 that started in 2017, is one of 32 in phase 3, and was the 92nd registered.

Rosacea

233 studies on the registry are indexed under Rosacea; 23 are open to participants now.

Browse Rosacea studies →

Open to participants now

8 of the 145 studies in Rosacea with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

3 more — sign in →

All 8 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 17 Rosacea studies recruiting now, 9 (53%) set no upper age limit and 7 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 take children under 18; 8 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 145 studies in Rosacea with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The primary objective is to show that open-label extended treatment with FMX103 1.5%, for up to an additional 40 weeks, is safe and well tolerated.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, multicenter, 40-week extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of FMX103 1.5% topical foam in the treatment of moderate-to-severe facial papulopustular rosacea. Subjects entering this study will have recently participated in 1 of 2 pivotal, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, safety and efficacy studies (FX2016-11 and FX2016-12 - NCT03142451). Subjects must demonstrate that they are eligible to continue into Study FX2016-13 based on safety evaluations and IGA score performed at Final Visit of one of the previous double-blind studies.

At the completion of the Final Visit in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12, subjects may be invited to continue into this open-label study for an additional 40 weeks of open-label treatment. A minimum of 400 subjects will be enrolled into from Studies FX2016-11 and FX2016-12. Subjects who elect to continue into this open-label study will receive supplies of active FMX103 1.5% minocycline foam.

03

Conditions studied

  • Papulopustular Rosacea

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Have completed 12 weeks of treatment in either Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12.
  2. Have not had a worsening of disease, determined by the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), at Visit 5/Week 12 (Final Visit) relative to the Day 0/Baseline assessment in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a new systemic disease or condition, including an ongoing AE that might interfere with the conduct of the study or the interpretation of results.
  2. Have developed a condition that would have been exclusionary for Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12, including pseudomembranous colitis, antibiotic associated colitis, hepatitis, liver damage, renal impairment, drug addiction, or alcohol abuse.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
504 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Minocycline Foam 1.5%

    FMX-103

    Drug: FMX103 1.5%

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 40

    Change from Baseline (Baseline visit in the initial DB study \[FX2016-11 or FX2016-12\] and Baseline visit of the open-label extension study \[Week 12\]) in inflammatory lesion count at Week 40 is reported. The lesion counts performed at Week 12 \[Final Visit\] in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12 constituted as the Baseline value for this study. Changes from Baseline were calculated as the Baseline \[pre-dose\] value minus the post-Baseline value, so that decreases reflected a reduction in lesion count. The number of papules, pustules, and nodules were counted, and the numbers recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) and at Week 40

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessments (IGA) Treatment Success at Week 40

    The IGA scale for Rosacea, was used by the Investigators to assess the severity of a participant's Rosacea. The scale ranges from 0 (Clear): No inflammatory papules or pustules to 4 (Severe): Many inflammatory papules or pustules, and up to 2 nodules. Higher scores indicated severe outcome. Treatment success was defined as an IGA score of 0 (score of clear) or 1 (almost clear), and at least a 2-grade improvement (decrease) from Baseline.

    Time frame: At Week 40

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34

    Change from Baseline (Baseline visit in the initial DB study \[FX2016-11 or FX2016-12\] and Baseline visit of the open-label extension study \[Week 12\]) in inflammatory lesion count at Week 40 is reported. The lesion counts performed at Week 12 \[Final Visit\] in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12 constituted as the Baseline value for this study. Changes from Baseline were calculated as the Baseline \[pre-dose\] value minus the post-Baseline value, so that decreases reflected a reduction in lesion count. The number of papules, pustules, and nodules were counted, and the numbers recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) and at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Treatment Success at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28 and 34

    The IGA scale for Rosacea, was used by the Investigators to assess the severity of a participant's Rosacea. The scale ranges from 0 (Clear): No inflammatory papules or pustules to 4 (Severe): Many inflammatory papules or pustules, and up to 2 nodules. Higher scores indicated severe outcome. Treatment success was defined as an IGA score of 0 (score of clear) or 1 (almost clear), and at least a 2-grade improvement (decrease) from Baseline.

    Time frame: At Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28 and Week 34

  3. Percentage Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34

    Change from Baseline (Baseline visit in the initial DB study \[FX2016-11 or FX2016-12\] and Baseline visit of the open-label extension study \[Week 12\]) in inflammatory lesion count at Week 40 is reported. The lesion counts performed at Week 12 \[Final Visit\] in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12 constituted as the Baseline value for this study. Changes from Baseline were calculated as the Baseline \[pre-dose\] value minus the post-Baseline value, so that decreases reflected a reduction in lesion count. The number of papules, pustules, and nodules were counted, and the numbers recorded.

    Time frame: Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) and at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34

  4. Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction With the Study Drug Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) at Week 40

    The questionnaire consisted of questions with responses on scale with scores: as 1 (Very satisfied or Very likely ) to 5 (Very dissatisfied or Very unlikely) for each variable as for example, Easy to use, 1 is very satisfied and 5 is very dissatisfied. The minimum score represented best outcome and higher score represented worst outcome.

    Time frame: At Week 40

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    Evaluation of the long-term safety of topical FMX103 1.5% minocycline foam in the treatment of moderate to severe facial papulopustular rosacea for 40 weeks. A Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) was defined as any AE with an onset date after the first dose date of the open-label extension study and before the last application of study drug plus 3 days having been absent pre-treatment or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state.

    Time frame: Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) until safety follow-up (Week 44)

07

Results

Posted Dec 29, 2020

Participant flow

This open-label, multi-center, 40-week extension study was conducted at 70 sites in the United States from 05 September 2017 to 03 January 2019, and enrolled participants from previous double-blind (DB) studies FX2016-11 and FX2016-12.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Started332172
Completed276134
Not completed5638
Withdrew: Adverse event42
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1613
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3020
Withdrew: Not mentioned63

Outcome measures

PrimaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 40

Change from Baseline (Baseline visit in the initial DB study \[FX2016-11 or FX2016-12\] and Baseline visit of the open-label extension study \[Week 12\]) in inflammatory lesion count at Week 40 is reported. The lesion counts performed at Week 12 \[Final Visit\] in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12 constituted as the Baseline value for this study. Changes from Baseline were calculated as the Baseline \[pre-dose\] value minus the post-Baseline value, so that decreases reflected a reduction in lesion count. The number of papules, pustules, and nodules were counted, and the numbers recorded.

Time frame:
Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) and at Week 40
Reported as:
Mean · Lesions
Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 40
LesionsDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 4023.0 ± 10.9622.5 ± 10.83
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessments (IGA) Treatment Success at Week 40

The IGA scale for Rosacea, was used by the Investigators to assess the severity of a participant's Rosacea. The scale ranges from 0 (Clear): No inflammatory papules or pustules to 4 (Severe): Many inflammatory papules or pustules, and up to 2 nodules. Higher scores indicated severe outcome. Treatment success was defined as an IGA score of 0 (score of clear) or 1 (almost clear), and at least a 2-grade improvement (decrease) from Baseline.

Time frame:
At Week 40
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessments (IGA) Treatment Success at Week 40
Percentage of participantsDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessments (IGA) Treatment Success at Week 4081.676.0
SecondaryAbsolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34

Change from Baseline (Baseline visit in the initial DB study \[FX2016-11 or FX2016-12\] and Baseline visit of the open-label extension study \[Week 12\]) in inflammatory lesion count at Week 40 is reported. The lesion counts performed at Week 12 \[Final Visit\] in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12 constituted as the Baseline value for this study. Changes from Baseline were calculated as the Baseline \[pre-dose\] value minus the post-Baseline value, so that decreases reflected a reduction in lesion count. The number of papules, pustules, and nodules were counted, and the numbers recorded.

Time frame:
Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) and at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34
Reported as:
Mean · Lesions
Absolute Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34
LesionsDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Week 419.5 ± 11.5717.4 ± 12.18
Week 1020.4 ± 11.6219.8 ± 12.92
Week 1621.9 ± 11.3820.0 ± 13.09
Week 2222.2 ± 12.3520.7 ± 11.33
Week 2822.4 ± 11.8921.7 ± 10.89
Week 3423.2 ± 11.7522.5 ± 10.71
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving IGA Treatment Success at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28 and 34

The IGA scale for Rosacea, was used by the Investigators to assess the severity of a participant's Rosacea. The scale ranges from 0 (Clear): No inflammatory papules or pustules to 4 (Severe): Many inflammatory papules or pustules, and up to 2 nodules. Higher scores indicated severe outcome. Treatment success was defined as an IGA score of 0 (score of clear) or 1 (almost clear), and at least a 2-grade improvement (decrease) from Baseline.

Time frame:
At Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28 and Week 34
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Treatment Success at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28 and 34
Percentage of participantsDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Week 450.648.2
Week 1060.154.5
Week 1668.164.0
Week 2269.164.4
Week 2872.465.9
Week 3473.572.1
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34

Change from Baseline (Baseline visit in the initial DB study \[FX2016-11 or FX2016-12\] and Baseline visit of the open-label extension study \[Week 12\]) in inflammatory lesion count at Week 40 is reported. The lesion counts performed at Week 12 \[Final Visit\] in Study FX2016-11 or Study FX2016-12 constituted as the Baseline value for this study. Changes from Baseline were calculated as the Baseline \[pre-dose\] value minus the post-Baseline value, so that decreases reflected a reduction in lesion count. The number of papules, pustules, and nodules were counted, and the numbers recorded.

Time frame:
Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) and at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34
Reported as:
Mean · Percent Change
Percentage Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, and 34
Percent ChangeDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Week 467.91 ± 27.56961.25 ± 32.306
Week 1072.43 ± 27.93769.02 ± 32.966
Week 1677.36 ± 22.73971.46 ± 33.230
Week 2277.51 ± 25.10173.63 ± 27.515
Week 2878.82 ± 23.43977.06 ± 25.863
Week 3481.91 ± 20.54980.38 ± 22.873
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction With the Study Drug Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) at Week 40

The questionnaire consisted of questions with responses on scale with scores: as 1 (Very satisfied or Very likely ) to 5 (Very dissatisfied or Very unlikely) for each variable as for example, Easy to use, 1 is very satisfied and 5 is very dissatisfied. The minimum score represented best outcome and higher score represented worst outcome.

Time frame:
At Week 40
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction With the Study Drug Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) at Week 40
ParticipantsDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
Easy to Use; 1-Very satisfied17882
Easy to Use; 5-Very dissatisfied02
Feel on Skin; 1-Very satisfied11047
Feel on Skin; 5-Very dissatisfied33
Odor; 1-Very satisfied15578
Odor; 5-Very dissatisfied00
Color; 1-Very satisfied10744
Color; 5-Very dissatisfied107
Ease of application; 1-Very satisfied18388
Ease of application; 5-Very dissatisfied00
Ease fitting in to daily routine; 1-Very satisfied15583
Ease fitting in to daily routine; 5-Very dissatisfied00
Compared to Other Products;1-Very satisfied14470
Compared to Other Products; 5-Very dissatisfied12
Use with other rosacea treatments; 1-Very likely15374
Use with other rosacea treatments; 5-Very unlikely35
Recommend to friend; 1-Very likely15675
Recommend to friend; 5-Very unlikely31
Overall Satisfaction with Product; 1-Very satisfied15575
Overall Satisfaction with Product; 5-Very dissatisfied21
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Evaluation of the long-term safety of topical FMX103 1.5% minocycline foam in the treatment of moderate to severe facial papulopustular rosacea for 40 weeks. A Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) was defined as any AE with an onset date after the first dose date of the open-label extension study and before the last application of study drug plus 3 days having been absent pre-treatment or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state.

Time frame:
Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) until safety follow-up (Week 44)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsDB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle Foam
All AEs15170
TEAEs13764
Serious TEAEs94
Treatment-related TEAEs58
Adverse events leading to study discontinuation32
Participants with any severe TEAE66
Death10

Adverse events

Collected over Day 0/ Baseline (Final visit of previous DB study [Week 12]) until safety follow-up (Week 44). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Minocycline Foam 1.5%1/332 (0.3%)9/332 (2.7%)8/332 (2.4%)
Vehicle Foam0/172 (0%)4/172 (2.3%)11/172 (6.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent serious events
EventMinocycline Foam 1.5%Vehicle Foam
Appendicitis perforatedInfections and infestations0/3321/172
Post procedural haemorrhageInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/3321/172
Large intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/3321/172
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3321/172
LabyrinthitisInfections and infestations1/3320/172
Periorbital cellulitisInfections and infestations1/3320/172
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/3320/172
Staphylococcal infectionInfections and infestations1/3320/172
Cerebrospinal fluid leakageNervous system disorders1/3320/172
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders1/3320/172
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMinocycline Foam 1.5%Vehicle Foam
SinusitisInfections and infestations8/33211/172

Baseline characteristics

All treated population included all participants who used the study drug at least once.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)DB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle FoamTotal
Mean51.1 ± 12.6251.9 ± 11.9051.4 ± 12.37
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle FoamTotal
Female241110351
Male9162153
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle FoamTotal
Hispanic or Latino623193
Not Hispanic or Latino269141410
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)DB-FMX103 1.5% Minocycline FoamDB-Vehicle FoamTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian347
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American538
White321163484
More than one race202
Unknown or Not Reported011
08

Study locations

79 sites
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 207
    Glendale, Arizona 85308, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 202
    Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 222
    Rogers, Arkansas 72758, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 127
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 226
    Los Angeles, California 90045, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 220
    Murrieta, California 92562, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 131
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 134
    Sacramento, California 95819, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 114
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 116
    San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 135
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 123
    Santa Monica, California 90403, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 239
    Temecula, California 92592, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 227
    Denver, Colorado 80209, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 223
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 215
    Boynton Beach, Florida 33437, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 109
    Clearwater, Florida 33757, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 240
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 112
    Hialeah, Florida 33016, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 214
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 241
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33162, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 104
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 121
    Sanford, Florida 32771, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 125
    Tampa, Florida 33609, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 124
    West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 118
    Alpharetta, Georgia 30022, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 204
    Newnan, Georgia 78660, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 233
    Sandy Springs, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 139
    Snellville, Georgia 30078, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 211
    Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 138
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 225
    Newburgh, Indiana 47630, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 218
    South Bend, Indiana 46617, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 235
    Louisville, Kentucky 40217, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 237
    Louisville, Kentucky 40241, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 102
    Metairie, Louisiana 70006, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 115
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 110
    Beverly, Massachusetts 01915, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 107
    Brighton, Massachusetts 02135, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 229
    Watertown, Massachusetts 02472, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 137
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 242
    Bay City, Michigan 48706, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 210
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 103
    Fort Gratiot, Michigan 48059, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 120
    Troy, Michigan 48084, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 140
    Warren, Michigan 48088, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 232
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 130
    Saint Joseph, Missouri 64506, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 133
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 221
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 136
    New York, New York 10075, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 111
    Stony Brook, New York 11790, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 119
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28277, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 238
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 212
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 234
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 101
    Bexley, Ohio 43209, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 128
    Dublin, Ohio 43016, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 236
    Norman, Oklahoma 73071, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 224
    Exton, Pennsylvania 19341, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 141
    Jenkintown, Pennsylvania 19046, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 129
    Yardley, Pennsylvania 19067, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 105
    Johnston, Rhode Island 02919, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 231
    Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 106
    Greenville, South Carolina 29607, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 230
    Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29464, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 228
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37922, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 219
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 132
    Austin, Texas 78746, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 117
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 201
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 206
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 108
    San Antonio, Texas 78213, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 208
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 213
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 209
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 126
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84117, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 216
    Lynchburg, Virginia 24501, United States
  • Foamix Investigational Site # 203
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2020, 1 year 11 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Feb 2020.

Of 17 phase 3 interventional studies under Rosacea, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median); a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 15. This study's 15 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2017
First posted
Sep 8, 2017
StartActual
Sep 5, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 3, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 15, 2019
Results delay requested
Feb 3, 2020
Results first posted
Dec 29, 2020
Last update
Jan 18, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03276936
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2017
Start date
Sep 5, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 3, 2019
Completion
Jan 15, 2019
Results posted
Dec 29, 2020
Last update
Jan 18, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: FMX103

Start the discussion