CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03275883Updated Mar 18, 2020

Arterial Patency in Liver Transplantation

An observational study in Aortohepatic Conduit, Patency Rate and Liver Transplantation, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-18.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
567
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to determine the risk profile of hepatic artery occlusion in liver transplant recipients who received an aortohepatic conduits, analyzing all consecutive cadaveric liver transplantations from July 2007 to 31st December 2016. Medical records will be examined and adverse events will be analyzed and categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND

Arterial conduits in liver transplantation are almost as old as the procedure itself. First described by Starzl in 1984, the knowledge remains superficial. Although rarely performed, there is no doubt that thousands of patients' lives were saved because of the use of arterial grafts. However, arterial grafts are known to be associated with a higher rate of occlusion and a lower patient and graft survival when compared to conventional end-to-end anastomosis. In our recent retrospective study, the investigators showed that retransplantation procedure and aspirin in patients' medication are independent risk factors for the need of an arterial conduit. The investigators assume that aspirin could be a surrogate marker for vascular and metabolic status. Furthermore, in a meta-analysis the investigators found a four times higher occlusion rate compared to non-conduits.

Whether the site of conduit placement or certain types of material have an impact on occlusion and graft survival remains unknown. In addition, several studies discuss that antiaggregation or anticoagulation might be protective for occlusion of arterial conduits. Currently, there is no study that investigated this problem, most probably because of low case numbers.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The primary goal of this study is to conduct a multicenter cohort analysis to define the outcome of different types of conduits and to investigate whether antiplatelet / anticoagulantion has an impact on patency rates.

  1. Specific aim #1: To identify independent risk factors for early and late occlusion of arterial conduits in liver transplantation.
  2. Specific aim #2: To compare different placement sites (infrarenal, supraceliac, iliacal, etc.) of arterial conduits in terms of occlusion rates and graft survival.
  3. Specific aim #3: To investigate whether antiplatelet therapy is protective in terms of arterial patency.

STUDY DESIGN

This will be a multicenter single cohort study including only cases of deceased donor liver transplantation that required an aorto-hepatic or iliac-hepatic conduit for arterial reconstruction. Primary endpoint is 30-day conduit patency. Secondary endpoints include postoperative complications, death, late conduit occlusion, graft and patient survival.

SETTING

This multicenter cohort study will include several high-volume centers worldwide. Each participating center requires a prospective database from that data can be extracted. All consecutive cases of deceased donor liver transplantation requiring an arterial conduit from 1st of January 2007 until 31st of December 2016 are included allowing a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. Data collection at conduit4olt.org will be prospective, structured, anonymized, and encrypted.

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW POLICY / ETHICAL POLICY

Each participating center is responsible to contact their local ethics committee and receive approval for participation, if applicable. For example, this project is considered as an audit in some countries and thus there is no need for formal approval in the form of a protocol submission.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria:

  • Liver transplantation requiring aorto-hepatic or iliac-hepatic conduits
  • Deceased donor after brain death (DBD) or deceased donor after circulatory death (DCD)
  • Whole organ as well as split allografts
  • Primary liver transplantation as well as liver retransplantation
  • Recipient age ≥18 years

Exclusion criteria:

  • Living donor liver transplantation
  • Pediatric liver transplantation (recipient age \<18 years)
  • Arterial reconstruction other than aorto-hepatic or iliac-hepatic conduits
  • Multivisceral transplantations

ESTIMATED SAMPLE SIZE

Each center should provide at least 30 cases that meet the inclusion criteria to allow adequate event rates for each outcome.

Statistical methods

The primary and secondary endpoints will be compared with patient and operation characteristics with univariate analysis. ROC Curve analysis will be performed to dichotomize continuous variables. Multivariable analysis (binary logistic and Cox regression) will be performed to identify independent risk factors. Statistical analysis will be performed using R Studio version 1.0.44 (RStudio, Inc. GNU Affero General Public License v3, Boston, MA, 2016) with the graphical user interface rBiostatistics.com beta version (rBiostatistics.com, Zurich, Switzerland, 2016, GNU License).

Christian E. Oberkofler Tim Reese Dimitri A. Raptis Henrik Petrowsky

On behalf of the conduit4olt.org team Swiss HPB Center, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortohepatic Conduit
  • Patency Rate
  • Liver Transplantation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who recieved an aorto-hepatic conduit during liver transplantation

Inclusion criteria

  • Liver transplantation requiring aorto-hepatic or iliac-hepatic conduits
  • Deceased donor after brain death (DBD) or deceased donor after circulatory death (DCD)
  • Whole organ as well as split allografts
  • Primary liver transplantation as well as liver retransplantation
  • Recipient age ≥18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Living donor liver transplantation
  • Pediatric liver transplantation (recipient age \<18 years)
  • Arterial reconstruction other than aorto-hepatic or iliac-hepatic conduits
  • Multivisceral transplantations
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
567 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • ProcedureAortohepatic Conduit

    Placement of an interposition graft between hepatic artery and aorta during liver transplantation

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Independent risk factors

    To identify independent risk factors for early and late occlusion of arterial conduits in liver transplantation.

    Time frame: June 2007 til 31st December 2016

  2. Placement sites

    To compare different placement sites (infrarenal, supraceliac, iliacal, etc.) of arterial conduits in terms of occlusion rates and graft survival

    Time frame: June 2007 til 31st December 2016

  3. Patency Rates

    To investigate whether antiplatelet therapy is protective in terms of arterial patency.

    Time frame: June 2007 til 31st December 2016

06

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich
    Zürich, 8091, Switzerland
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — all collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03275883
Lead sponsor
University of Zurich
Collaborators
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Medical University Innsbruck, University of Bologna, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of California, Los Angeles, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Rennes University Hospital, University of Lyon, University of Rochester, University of Southern California
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2018
Completion
Dec 1, 2019
Last update
Mar 18, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion