CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03274154Updated Sep 6, 2017

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement

An interventional study of Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov in Moderate-severe Skin Aging/Photoaging, sponsored by Derming SRL. Completed. Open to female participants aged 35 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-06.

Sponsored by Derming SRL · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group

Read the detailed description

Aim of the study was to evaluate the anti-age activity of "Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov" a food supplement, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese), taken for 4 consecutive months by female subjects aged 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years), with moderate-severe skin aging/photoaging according to a reference photographic scale.

The study foresaw the evaluation of the study product activity versus a control group, untreated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Moderate-severe Skin Aging/Photoaging
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • female sex,
  • age 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years),
  • body mass index (BMI) 18-27,
  • caucasian healthy subjects with moderate-severe cutaneous aging/photoaging (score > 3 of the reference photographic scale in appendix 8),
  • agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up,
  • accepting to follow the instructions received by the investigator,
  • accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products,
  • agreeing not to apply any topical or take any oral product or nutritional supplementation (vitamins and minerals) other than the investigational products, or use face massages or other means known to improve skin wrinkles or skin qualities during the entire duration of the study,
  • accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study,
  • no participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 3 months
  • accepting to sign the Informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy,
  • lactation,
  • subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study,
  • subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test at T0, T1, T2 and T3,
  • sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
  • subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable.

4.4.2. Dependent on a clinical condition 4.4.2.1. Dermatological disease,

  • Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area as lesions, scars, malformations,
  • recurrent facial/labial herpes,
  • clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
  • Endocrine disease,
  • hepatic disorder,
  • renal disorder,
  • cardiac disorder,
  • pulmonary disease,
  • cancer,
  • neurological or psychological disease,
  • inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease,
  • drug allergy.
  • Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic (application on the face) and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago),
  • assumption of drugs or dietary supplements able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov

    43 caucasian female subjects have taken during a meal, for the first 4 months of trial,1 capsule and 1 tablet/die of the food supplement composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese) .

    Dietary Supplement: Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov

  • No intervention
    Untreated group

    23 caucasian female subjects untreated

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementPre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov

    Food supplement consisting og a tablet and a capsule, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Crow's feet visual score variation

    Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  2. Nasolabial folds visual score variation

    Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  3. Surface microrelief regularity evaluation

    Regularity grade was evaluated according to this score: 1. = very regular 2. = regular 3. = irregular 4. = very irregular

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  4. Skin resistance to pinching clinical score variation

    The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  5. Skin resistance to traction clinical score variation

    The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  6. Skin recovery after pinching clinical score variation

    The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important 1. = important 2. = moderate 3. = weak 4. = very weak

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  7. Skin dryness clinical score variation

    Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score: 0 = very hydrated skin 1. = hydrated skin 2. = normal skin 3. = kindly dry skin 4. = dry skin 5. = very dry skin

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  8. Vascular homogeneity clinical score variation

    Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous 1. = homogeneous 2. = quite not homogeneous 3. = not homogeneous 4. = very not homogeneous 5. = marked not homogeneous

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  9. Pigmentary homogeneity clinical score variation

    Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score: 0 = very homogeneous 1. = homogeneous 2. = quite not homogeneous 3. = not homogeneous 4. = very not homogeneous 5. = marked not homogeneous

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  10. Skin radiance clinical score variation

    Skin radiance was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  11. Skin plumpness clinical score variation

    Skin plumpness was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Superficial skin hydration

    Skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany). The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  2. Deep skin hydration

    Tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  3. Determination of roughness profilometric parameters

    Nasolabial folds profilometric parameters measured by Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik). Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

  4. Tolerance evaluation

    The food supplement tolerance will be evaluated considering: any adverse event related to the study treatment, which occurred during the study; any judgement reported by the volunteers.

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03274154
Lead sponsor
Derming SRL
Responsible party
Adele Sparavigna (Medical Doctor, Derming SRL) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
Start date
Oct 11, 2016
Primary completion
Mar 22, 2017
Completion
Mar 22, 2017
Last update
Sep 6, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion