ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03270748GITMO-PHYLOSUpdated Mar 10, 2023

Post Transplant High-Dose Cy as GvHD Prophylaxis in 1 HLA Mismatched Unrelated HSCT for Myeloid Malignancies

A Phase 2 interventional study of GvHD prophylaxis in Myeloid Malignancies, sponsored by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo. Completed at 33 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-10.

Sponsored by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
78
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The experimental treatment consists in the application of a therapeutic strategy with post Transplant High-Dose Cyclophosphamide as GvHD Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving 1-Antigen/Allele HLA Mismatched (7/8 matched) Unrelated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Malignancies.

Read the detailed description

The experimental treatment consists in the application of a therapeutic strategy with post Transplant High-Dose Cyclophosphamide as GvHD Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving 1-Antigen/Allele HLA Mismatched (7/8 matched) Unrelated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Malignancies Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative therapy for a variety of hematologic malignancies due to two separate components: chemo/radiotherapy administered before the transplant (conditioning regimen) and the presence of immunocompetent cells in the graft, capable of inducing a "graft-versus-malignancy effect" also known as "GvL" effect. However, this immune-reaction usually carries the risk of detrimental effects seen as a multi-organ syndrome known as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which remains the most feared complication of Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. GvHD may be given to disparities between donor and recipient in presence of gene mismatches in the Major Histocompatibility Complex, also known as Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) system, or in any minor histocompatibility antigen. Thus, GvHD is obviously more common (and possibly more severe) in patients transplanted from HLA-mismatched donors as compared with those receiving grafts from HLA-matched donors.

A major limitation of allo-HSCT is the availability of a donor given that only a small percentage of patients has a HLA identical family donor. For the majority of patients (approximately 70%) who lack a HLA-identical sibling, alternative donors include HLA-matched unrelated donors and cord blood units. The chance of identifying a suitable marrow unrelated donor (MUD) in the international voluntary donor registries is limited by the frequency of a certain HLA genotype in the general population.

One of the alternative options in such cases is the use of a HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD). HLA-mismatching is defined as the presence of unshared antigens/alleles in recipient-donor pairs for HLA-A, -B, -C or DRB1 loci.

Patients undergoing MUD or MMUD transplants usually receive an intensified three-drug immunosuppressive regimen: anti-thymocyte globulin in addition to the standard platform of a calcineurine-inhibitor and an anti-metabolite.

The effect of HLA mismatches on clinical outcomes has been investigated in several studies. Single HLA mismatches at HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 locus (7/8 HLA-matched) were associated with lower overall survival and disease free survival, higher non-relapse mortality, and higher incidence of acute GvHD as compared with 8/8 HLA-matched pairs.

Many clinical trials suggest that high-dose Cy administrated after allogeneic HSCT didn't cause prolonged aplasia due toxicity on donor stem cells; could prevent rejection due to HLA-disparity and could be effective in preventing GvHD, allowing adequate immune-reconstitution.

With this study the investigators plan to investigate if post-transplant high-dose Cy, with a calcineurine inhibitor and mycophenolate, could reduce acute GvHD rates and infectious complications improving clinical outcomes of MMUD transplants in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myeloid Malignancies

Keywords

  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • acute graft-versus-host disease
  • Unrelated donors
  • Post-transplant cyclophosphamide
  • Myeloid Malignancies
  • unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation
  • GITMO
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission Myelodysplastic syndrome Indication for allo-HCT No available HLA identical sibling donor or HLA matched unrelated donor Activation of an alternative donor search Presence of a 1 antigen/allele mismatched (7/8 HLA matched) unrelated donor performance status \<2 Written and signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

\< 40% , FVC, DLCO \<50% of predicted LFT > 5 times the \< 40 ml/min Previous allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
78 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Experimental: Experimental The experimental consists in the application of a therapeutic strategy: post Transplant High-Dose Cyclophosphamide as GvHD Prophylaxis in Patients Receiving 1-Antigen/Allele HLA Mismatched (7/8 matched) Unrelated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Malignancies Therapeutic intervention, namely conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis, are based on standard current regimens: Busulfan 0,8 mg/kg 4 times per day during 2 h infusions for 4 consecutive days (from day -6 through day -3) Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 per day for 4 days (from day -6 through day -3); GvHD prophylaxis: Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus beginning day+5 up to at least 100 days. Micofenolate 15mg/kg twice a day from day +5 to +35.

    Drug: GvHD prophylaxis

Interventions

  • DrugGvHD prophylaxis

    Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg intravenously day+3 and +4 (total dose:100 mg/kg).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. incidence of acute GvHD

    cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (grade II-IV) at 100 days post Unrelated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

    Time frame: day +100 post-transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    is defined as the time from transplant to the date of death due to any cause or to the last date the patient was known to be alive (censored observation) or to the date of the data cut-off for final analysis

    Time frame: 1 year post transplantation

  2. GRFS (GvHD free, relapse free survival)

    are defined as occurrence of grade III-IV acute GvHD, chronic GvHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse, or death from any cause

    Time frame: first 12 months after transplantation

  3. chronic graft-versus-host disease

    Cumulative incidence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (by NIH criteria)

    Time frame: 3 years from transplantation

  4. Graft failure

    failure a) Primary graft failure is defined as \< 5% donor chimerism. Secondary graft failure (graft rejection) is defined as initial recovery followed by neutropenia with \<5% donor chimerism. b) Rate of graft rejection and graft failure

    Time frame: day +100 and 1 year after transplantation

  5. Haematopoietic Recovery

    Time to reach an absolute neutrophil count \> 0.5 109/L from day of HSCT. Neutrophil recovery end-point will be defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count \> 0.5 x109/L. Time to reach platelet engraftment, defined as the number of days after HSCT (Day 0) for patients to maintain an un-transfused platelet count of \> 20.0 x 109/L.

    Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 30 days

  6. Non Relapse Mortality

    The cumulative incidence of Non Relapse Mortality is defined as death due to any other cause than progression of malignancy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Cumulative incidence

    Time frame: at 100 days, at 180days and at 1 year from transplantation

  7. Relapse and Residual Disease

    Testing for recurrent malignancy in the blood, marrow or other sites will be used to assess relapse after transplantation. For the purpose of this study, relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodisplastic syndrome consistent with pre-transplant features. Molecular relapse will be defined where available as any evidence of a pre-transplant defined abnormality using conventional cytogenetics or FISH techniques or cytofluorimetric analysis or molecular probes

    Time frame: at 1 year from transplantation

  8. Incidence of infectious complications and kinetics of immune-reconstitution

    the rate of proven and probable invasive fungal infections and viral reactivation/disease (CMV, HHV6,Adenovirus, EBV). Immune-reconstitution will be evaluated with lymphocyte sub-populations counts (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16+, CD20+) and IgG, IgA, IgM titer

    Time frame: one year after transplant

07

Study locations

33 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio
    Alessandria, Italy
  • Ospedali Riuniti
    Ancona, Italy
  • Ospedale Moscati
    Avellino, Italy
  • Policlinico di Bari-Ematologia con trapianti
    Bari, Italy
  • Divisione di Ematologia - Ospedali Papa Giovanni XXIII
    Bergamo, Italy
  • Ospedale San Orsola
    Bologna, Italy
  • Ospedale Regionale Generale- Divisione Ematologia
    Bolzano, Italy
  • ASST Spedali Civili
    Brescia, Italy
  • Ospedale Binaghi
    Cagliari, Italy
  • S.C. Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle
    Cuneo, Italy
  • Ematologia e Centro Trapianti Midollo Osseo - Ospedale IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
    Foggia, Italy
  • AOU-IRCCS San Martino-IST
    Genova, Italy
  • Osp. Card. Panico
    Lecce, Italy
  • AOU Integrata
    Mestre, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
    Milano, Italy
  • Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Grande
    Milano, Italy
  • Divisione Ematologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria - Policlinico -
    Modena, Italy
  • ASST Ospedale S. Gerardo de' i Tintori - Università degli Studi di Milano
    Monza, Italy
  • A.O.U. Policlinico Federico II
    Napoli, Italy
  • Azienda ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma
    Parma, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS San Matteo
    Pavia, 27100, Italy
  • Ospedale G. Da Saliceto di Piacenza
    Piacenza, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
    Pisa, Italy
  • Centro Unico Regionale Trapianti di Midollo Osseo - Ospedale Bianchi-Melacino-Morelli
    Reggio Calabria, Italy
  • A.O. San Camillo Forlanini
    Roma, Italy
  • Divisione di Ematologia - Istituto di Semeiotica Medica - Policlinico A. Gemelli
    Roma, Italy
  • Policlinico Umberto I
    Roma, Italy
  • Az. Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese - Divisione Ematologia e Trapianti
    Siena, Italy
  • Ospedale Moscati
    Taranto, Italy
  • A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza
    Torino, Italy
  • Ospedale Gonzaga
    Torino, Italy
  • A.O. Santa Maria della Misericordia
    Udine, Italy
  • Ospedale S. Bortolo-Divisione Ematologia
    Vicenza, Italy
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2020 to primary completion in Nov 2022, 34 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 24, 2017
First posted
Sep 1, 2017
StartActual
Jan 15, 2020
Primary completionActual
Nov 20, 2022
CompletionActual
Nov 20, 2022
Last update
Mar 10, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03270748
Lead sponsor
Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 1, 2017
Start date
Jan 15, 2020
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2022
Completion
Nov 20, 2022
Last update
Mar 10, 2023

Study contacts

Annamaria Raiola, MD
principal investigator · Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-IST

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion