ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03270137AD-EMTrUpdated Sep 1, 2017

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Alzheimer Disease

An interventional study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation- IDLPFC and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation - Six regions in Alzheimer Disease and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de la Fuente. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-01.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de la Fuente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2017), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2016, registered Aug 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Randomized clinical trial, comparative and single blind aims to determine effects on cognition, psychological and behavioral symptoms and functionality of 5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) administered over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) compared to six regions protocol, divided in two sub-conditions: day 1 (Broca area, Wernicke area and lDLPFC) alternated by day 2 (left and right parietal association cortex, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [rDLPFC]). Main outcomes will be evaluated at ending of 15 rTMS sessions and 4 weeks after.

Read the detailed description

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline that affects behavior and daily functionality. Its etiology is unknown and treatment efficacy is partial. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has been suggested as a potential treatment as of several trials has revealed improvements in language, episodic memory, psychological and behavioral symptoms in dementia as well as functionality using different experimental designs, stimulation parameters and cortical targets comparisons. However, it remains to determine the most effective modality, comparing outcomes with cortical targets poorly studied and how much the effects last. The main objective of this study is to determine which of two stimulation modalities provides a better cognitive and behavioral effect also on functionality in patients with potential diagnosis of AD, administered over lDLPFC (Condition A) and a six areas condition (Condition B) in which are alternated two sub-conditions (Day 1: Broca and Wernicke areas and lDLPFC, and Day 2: bilateral parietal association cortex and rDLPFC) along 15 sessions and 1500 pulses per session.

For this purpose, will be randomized 22 patients with potential diagnosis of AD (according to DSM-5) to both stimulation conditions (11 patients to each condition). The rTMS will be administered at 5 Hz and 1500 pulses per session (30 trains and 10 seconds inter-train interval) along 15 sessions with a post-treatment evaluation at 4 weeks comparing: time response, post-treatment effects and 4 weeks effects.

To evaluate clinical response among stimulation conditions will be used Alzheimer´s Disease Assessment Scale COGNITIVE (ADAS-cog), Cumming's Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Yesavage Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Interview for Deterioration-in-daily Living Activities in Dementia (IDDD) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The modified version of Mini Mental State (MMSE-FOLSTEIN) will be applied in the same time points of other evaluations also at the session 5 and 10. Other interest variables are: age, sex, civil status, education, occupation, time and type of pharmacological treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Keywords

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • rTMS
  • Cognition
  • Behavioral Symptoms
  • Functionality
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de la Fuente is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with file number at National Institute of Psychiatry "Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz".
  • Scholarship of at least 5 years or above.
  • Dementia diagnosis established by clinical examination made by their responsible physician, according the Diagnose Criteria for Alzheimer Disease for possible, mild or moderate according to . Severity will be stratified with Mini-Mental State (-FOLSTEIN): as a) mild: 21-26 and b) moderated 15-20 points; in addition, with Reisberg Global Deterioration, the states from 2 to 4 that correspond a cognitive deficit mild and moderated.
  • In the case of concomitant treatment with memantine or acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, the patient should have taken it for at least 6 months prior to study.
  • In the case of other pharmacological treatments for psychiatric conditions, for example, antidepressants, anxiolytic or antipsychotics, the patient should have taken stable doses for at least 2 months.
  • Patients with another no-psychiatric comorbidity should be stable (according to diagnostic criteria and supported by laboratory studies or metric assessments).
  • Every patient should have a caregiver (for example, spouse, a relative or a professional caregiver) along the study who could stay with the patient at least 10 hours/week.
  • Signing of by patient and caregiver.
  • Patients and caregivers who can attend in weekdays, along three weeks assessments and treatment sessions at National Institute of Psychiatry "Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz".

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe agitation symptoms or difficulties to cooperate with the study.
  • Patients with history of epilepsy.
  • Patients with sudden onset of apoplexy, focal neurologic findings as hemiparesis, sensory loss, visual field deficit and lack of coordination in the legs in early stages of disease.
  • Convulsion or walking disorder at onset or very early stages of the disease.
  • Patients with history of severe psychiatric disorders.
  • Patients with alterations in a conventional electroencephalogram (paroxysmal phenomena identified by a specialized clinical neurophysiologist).
  • Patients with pacemaker or implanted metallic intracranial objects.

Elimination criteria:

  • Decision of patient or caregiver to left the study.
  • Modification in doses or pharmacological treatment prior to start the study.
  • Patients with new clinical findings and who require complementary pharmacological treatment.
  • Presence of adverse events that could affect health and could limit maintain the patient in treatment.
  • Exacerbation of cognitive or behavioral symptoms during the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Condition A: rTMS on L-DLPFC

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation- IDLPFC. The intervention will be rTMS delivered on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). Every patient will receive 15 rTMS sessions (in weekdays) along three weeks at 5 Hz of frequency and at its 100% of motor threshold. Each session will consist of 30 trains separated by 10 seconds inter-train interval and 1500 total pulses per session. Equipment to rTMS includes a Magpro R30 stimulator (Magventure, Denmark) with an 8-shape coil model MCF-B70.

    Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation- IDLPFC

  • Active comparator
    Condition B: rTMS on six regions

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation - Six regions. Two sub-conditions will alternate each session, starting with day 1: rTMS on Broca and Wernicke area and lDLPFC and then day 2: rTMS on left and right parietal association cortex (lPAC; rPAC) and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC). Patients will receive 15 intervention sessions (in weekdays) along three weeks at 5 Hz frequency and 100% of motor threshold. Each area will receive 10 trains (500 pulses) separated by 10 seconds of inter-train interval that correspond to 1500 total pulses per session. Equipment to rTMS includes a Magpro stimulator (Dantec, Denmark) with an 8-shape coil model MC-B70.

    Device: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation - Six regions

Interventions

  • Devicerepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation- IDLPFC

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 5Hz administered over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 5Hz administered over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) compared to six regions protocol, divided in two sub-conditions: day 1 (Broca area, Wernicke area and lDLPFC) alternated by day 2 (left and right parietal association cortex, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex \[rDLPFC\]). Main outcomes will be evaluated at ending of 15 rTMS sessions and 4 weeks after.

  • Devicerepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation - Six regions

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 5Hz administered on six regions protocol, divided in two sub-conditions: day 1 (Broca area, Wernicke area and lDLPFC) alternated by day 2 (left and right parietal association cortex, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex \[rDLPFC\]). Main outcomes will be evaluated at ending of 15 rTMS sessions and 4 weeks after.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes on cognitive functioning (ADAS-cog)

    ADAS-cog is cognitive testing instrument to measure severity. It explores 11 domains including memory, language, praxis, attention and other cognitive abilities which are often referred to as the core symptoms of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post rTMS treatment: at week 3, and at week 4.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes on cognitive effects (Mini Mental State)

    This instrument gives scores to orientation in time and space, registration information (three words) and recovering, attention, calculation, language (denomination, repetition, understanding of complex orders, reading and writing) and finally visuoconstruction (two overlapping diamonds).

    Time frame: Baseline, every week for 3 weeks during rTMS treatment and at the 4th week after treatment.

  2. Changes on behavioral symptoms (NPI)

    This is a diagnostic instrument to determine the presence of behavioral symptoms. It measures frequency and severity of symptoms in the last month and the overload for the caregiver. This test divides behavioral symptoms in: delirium, hallucinations, agitation or aggressivity, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, irritability/lability, disinhibition, aberrant motor behavior, sleep and appetite/feeding.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post rTMS treatment: at week 3, and at week 4.

  3. Changes on depression symptoms (GDS-Yesavage)

    Repeated application allows to evaluate changes in the geriatric depression evolution.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post rTMS treatment: at week 3, and at week 4.

  4. Changes on effects on functionality (IDDD)

    This is an instrument designed to evaluate functionality in dementia. It evaluates self-care and complex activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post rTMS treatment: at week 3, and at week 4.

  5. Changes on Clinical Global Impression (CGI)

    Standardized and descriptive scale, it gives qualitative information to identify changes in the illness through measuring severity of clinical picture and improvements triggered by treatments (change in the time) as well as treatment efficacy.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post rTMS treatment: at week 3, and at week 4.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2016 to primary completion in Feb 2017, 11 months.

Of 882 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 959 studies reached it within 29 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 21, 2017
First posted
Sep 1, 2017
StartActual
Mar 10, 2016
Primary completionActual
Feb 28, 2017
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2017
Last update
Sep 1, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03270137
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de la Fuente
Collaborators
National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico
Responsible party
Ruth Alcala Lozano (Principal Investigator, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Dr. Ramón de la Fuente) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 1, 2017
Start date
Mar 10, 2016
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2017
Completion
Aug 31, 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion