An interventional study of LARC forward structured contraceptive counselling in Impact of Contraceptive Counselling on LARC Uptake and Unplanned Pregnancy, sponsored by Kristina Gemzell Danielsson. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-18.
Sponsored by Kristina Gemzell Danielsson · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Training of health care providers and structured LARC forward counseling may contribute to increased LARC uptake. The hypothesis to be tested is that by introducing LARC forward counselling an increase in LARC usage will be the result as well as decreased unplanned pregnancy and abortion. It is expected that the results of this study will highlight the importance of LARC forward counseling and thus provide the evidence needed to train health care providers and increase access to LARC in youth clinics, midwifery clinics and for post abortion contraception.
Kristina Gemzell Danielsson is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinics randomized to "intervention" will provide structured LARC centered counselling
Other: LARC forward structured contraceptive counselling
Clinics randomized to routine counselling
Training of health care providers (HCPs), use of information material and counselling tools
LARC prescriptions (recorded electronic prescriptions)
The rate of women who receive a LARC prescription
Time frame: Evaluated at the index visit to the clinic
LARC placements recorded in patient records
The rate of women who has a LARC method placed following the baseline visit
Time frame: Evaluated at 3months follow up (FU)
Contraceptive method used reported by participants
The rate of women who use a contraceptive method
Time frame: Evaluated at 3,6 and 12 months FU
Satisfaction with the chosen contraceptive method reported by participants
Satisfaction with the prescribed contraceptive method
Time frame: Evaluated at 3,6 and 12 months FU
(Unplanned) pregnancy reported by participants and recorded in patient records
(Unplanned) pregnancy rate
Time frame: Evaluated at 3,6 and 12 months FU
Plan to share: No
Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in May 2019, 20 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Kristina Gemzell Danielsson