An observational study in Evidence-Based Practice and Nurse's Role, sponsored by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-04.
Sponsored by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center · Observational
The Institute of Medicine's (IOM) ambitious goal for at least 90% of clinical decisions to be evidence-based includes nursing interventions and practice. Models and frameworks have been developed to meet the demand for practice transformation. While magnet facilities require a commitment to evidence-based nursing practice, military facilities currently lack such a requirement but are instituting evidence-based practice (EBP) initiatives in a purposeful path toward developing high-reliability organizations. Currently, little is known regarding the effectiveness of specific EBP models and frameworks within the military culture. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the effectiveness of the Advancing Research and Clinical Practice through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model in an Air Force Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) beginning with nursing services.
Research questions:
This study includes an intervention group (n=70) of active duty nurses and technicians who attend an intensive 5-day EBP Immersion Workshop and a control group (n=70) who do not. The intervention group will have access to specialized resources such as: a) Center for Transdisciplinary Evidence-Based Practice (CTEP) expert EBP mentors, b) EBP toolkit and resources, c) one year of free access to the Ohio State University (OSU) virtual library. Control group participants will have standard MTF education opportunities. Established valid and reliable survey measures (EBP attitudes, knowledge, beliefs) will be hosted electronically by CTEP at baseline, three, and twelve months. Online measures include institutional and nursing process measures (EBP implementation, policy changes, and publications) over the two-year study period. De-identified data from the anonymous survey measures will be shared by CTEP with this study team. Data analysis will include Student's t-tests to explore differences between groups. Repeated measures ANOVA or the nonparametric equivalent (Friedman's test or Skillings-Mack test) will be used to compare three time points within groups. Feasibility metrics and demographics will be reported with descriptive statistics.
Further study details as provided by David Grant Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, California
David Grant Medical Center active duty nurses and technicians
Exclusion Criteria:
CTEP EBP Immersion Course
Behavioral: CTEP EBP Immersion
No CTEP EBP Immersion Course
36 continuing ed credits, virtual library access, collaboration with expert mentors
Organizational Culture & Readiness for System-Wide Implementation of EBP Scale (OCRSIEP) changes over time
25-item assessment of organizational readiness and perceived strengths and barriers for EBP implementation. A 5-point Likert scale with, 1 (not at all) through 5 (very much) measures item response to questions focused on the extent that EBP is included in current organizational culture. For example, "To what extend do you believe that EBP is practiced in your organization?" Overall, the instrument measures the relationship between cultural factors and the organization's implementation of EBP over a 6-month time frame. Validity is reported with content and face validity and internal consistency reliabilities greater than 0.85
Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 12
Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs (EBPB) Scale changes over time
16-item assessment of an individual's beliefs regarding the value of EBP and capability for EBP implementation in clinical nursing practice. A 5-point Likert scale with, 1 (strongly disagree) through 5 (strongly agree) measures item response to statements about EBP, such as: "I believe EBP takes too much time"... "I am clear about the steps of EBP." It is anticipated, based on the results of several studies, that higher scores on the EBPB scale are associated with greater implementation of EBP and better healthcare outcomes. Validity is reported with content and face validity as well as internal consistency reliabilities greater than 0.85.
Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 12
Evidence-Based Practice Implementation (EBPI) Scale changes over time
18-item instrument to measure the extent to which healthcare workers integrate scientific evidence in their clinical practice. A 5-point ordinal scale with frequencies listed from 0 times (0 pt.), 1-3 times (1 pt.), 4-5 times (2 pt.), 6-7 times (3 pt.) and \> 8 times (4 pt.) is used to assess how often each item has applied over the past 8 weeks. For example, how often have you: "Used evidence to change my clinical practice...", "Accessed the National Guidelines Clearinghouse..." Total scores are summed where higher scores indicate greater integration of EBP in the healthcare workers practice. Validity is reported with content and face validity as well as internal consistency reliabilities greater than 0.85.
Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 12
EBP Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire (EBP-KAQ) changes over time
27-item multiple-choice objective knowledge measure of examine EBP knowledge.
Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 12
Nursing process outcomes changes over time
projects, policy changes, publications
Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 12
Feasibility metrics changes over time
Costs, mentors, staff retention
Time frame: baseline, month 3, month 12
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center