ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03266523VERTIMUpdated Dec 27, 2017

Influence of Natural Images on Patients' Anxiety in the Waiting Rooms of Imaging Ward

An observational study in All Conditions for Which a CT or MRI Exam Can be Required, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-27.

Primary conditionAnxiety Disorders(the registry's first term)UnverifiedIs this wrong?The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it. No better condition is named, so the registry's term is kept.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
418
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

VERTIM study aims to evaluate the influence of different environments of imaging waiting rooms on the anxiety felt by patients before MRI or CT scans. For this, four environments (neutral/standard; and nature "green", "sea", and "zen") will be set up in MRI and CT waiting rooms.

Read the detailed description

Each year, the Medical Imaging Unit of the University Hospital of Bordeaux (CHU Bordeaux) receives 80,500 patients for CT or MRI scans in usual care. The length of waiting, the environment of the waiting room, the reasons for the examination are factors that increase the levels of anxiety during waiting and but also during early examination.

Previous studies have shown that the integration of nature (real as well as artificial) is likely to decrease the level of anxiety. Before implementing a multicentre and randomised trial, a pilot study is necessary to assess the feasibility of the procedure, to test the relevance of the tools, to identify the influence of socio-cultural and socio-demographic characteristics on anxiety's level.

For this, the present study will be conducted over the same period of the year in order to avoid seasonality biases. The study will take place over 8 weeks, during which MRI or scanner patients will be exposed either to the neutral environment (standard environment of the waiting room) or to one of the 3 environments (wall posters representing the nature ("green", "sea", "zen")).

There is no specific intervention assigned to the study participants, i.e. the patients will receive one of the four environments as part of routine medical care, and a researcher studies the effect of this environment on anxiety's level. Every week, one environment will be set up in the MRI or scanner waiting room and the study will be proposed to all eligible patients present in this room. Fifty patients are expected each week so that 100 patients per environment and equally distributed between the MRI and scanner waiting rooms are expected.

02

Conditions studied

  • All Conditions for Which a CT or MRI Exam Can be Required

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CT
  • MRI
  • Anxiety-state
  • Anxiety State-Trait
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders Unverified

7,207 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 418 is above the median of 168 across 978 observational studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 807 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Compared within Anxiety Disorders, the registry's first condition term, which may not be this study's main condition. Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The participants are major patients who will be present in the waiting room of the MRI or the scanner in order to carry out one of these two exams

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patient 18 yrs and older;
  • patients in MRI or scanner's waiting room awaiting one of these 2 exams;
  • patients not objecting to answer questionnaires;
  • patient covered under social security

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient \<18yrs old;
  • patients with hearing and visual impairments;
  • patients unable to answer questionnaires;
  • patients awaiting for other exams than MRI or scanner;
  • legally protected patient
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
418 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control

    The CONTROL (neutral) environment corresponds to the standard environment of the imaging waiting rooms

  • Zen

    The ZEN environment will represent a clean, minimalist nature

    Other: Natural images in imaging waiting rooms

  • Green

    The GREEN environment will represent rural landscapes, undergrowth

    Other: Natural images in imaging waiting rooms

  • Sea

    The SEA environment will represent lakes, ponds, seaside

    Other: Natural images in imaging waiting rooms

Interventions

  • OtherNatural images in imaging waiting rooms

    Standard environment for hospital imaging waiting rooms

    Also known as: Neutral

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average of the scores of anxiety-State (STAI-Y).

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average of the scores of emotional perception for the various esthetic approaches

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  2. Scores of the anxiety-trait in each of the subgroups

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  3. Scores of satisfaction for the various esthetic approaches

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  4. Strength of the interaction between emotional perception *environnement to explain the level of anxiety State

    This outcome is measured through the scores of emotional perception (emotional perception), the nature of environment applied (control, zen, green or sea) and the STAI-Y scale score (level of state anxiety)

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  5. Reliability of the tool: coefficient alpha of Cronbach, or coefficient α ≥ 0,7.

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  6. Reason for MRI or scanner's prescription

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  7. Anxiolytic treatment and / or antidepressants (regular intake)

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  8. Anxiolytic treatment (specific prescription for examination)

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  9. gender

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  10. age

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  11. Level of education

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  12. professional category

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  13. Type of housing

    house or building, floor, elevator, garden, ...

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

  14. Lifestyle

    urban, rural

    Time frame: The day the patient waits in the imaging waiting room

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hopital Pellegrin
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2017, 2 months.

Of 411 non-industry observational studies under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 49. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 439 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 12, 2017
First posted
Aug 30, 2017
StartActual
Oct 3, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 15, 2017
CompletionActual
Dec 15, 2017
Last update
Dec 27, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 27, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03266523
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2017
Start date
Oct 3, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2017
Completion
Dec 15, 2017
Last update
Dec 27, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion