CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03256188InPACTUpdated Aug 21, 2017

Interrupting Prolonged Sitting With Activity

An interventional study of Active classroom in Physical Activity, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-21.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study tested the feasibility of interrupting prolonged sitting with 10, 3-minute activity breaks in elementary school classrooms. Three elementary schools in Southeast Michigan (20 teachers, 500 students) participated in this study.

Read the detailed description

School environments have historically provided many opportunities for children to be physically active through comprehensive programs, including recess, intramural physical activity clubs, interscholastic sports and physical education. However, with recent cuts to public school funding and an increased emphasis on standardized test scores, schools districts across the country have reduced time allocated for structured physical activity in favor of additional academic instruction time. This is troubling as uninterrupted prolonged sitting time is associated with increased disruptive behavior, lower academic achievement and increased obesity risk in children. As such, developing low-cost, innovative physical activity interventions aimed at improving weight outcomes and cognitive function in children are warranted.

Researchers have targeted the school classroom, where students spend the majority of their time, as a potential intervention site. Classroom-based physical activity interventions have been largely successful at increasing physical activity, improving physical fitness and academic achievement among children. Yet, no intervention to date has been able to produce significant improvements in weight status, in part due to the intensity, duration and frequency of activities employed (i.e., low-to-moderate intensity; 10-30 minutes per session; 1-2 sessions per day). Preliminary evidence from our laboratory suggests intermittent activity breaks performed at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity elicits greater total daily physical activity energy expenditure without subsequent increases in food intake compared to lower intensity activities. Other researchers have confirmed greater reductions in weight and fat mass in response to higher rather than lower intensity physical activities. In addition, short bursts of activity rather than continuous movements more closely mimics children's natural activity patterns in free-living environments. Hence, incorporating intermittent activity breaks of moderate-to-vigorous intensity as an intervention component may increase the likelihood of classroom-based physical activity interventions improving weight outcomes in children.

Implementing intermittent activity breaks in a classroom will require adjustments to both teaching curricula and classroom design. Current teaching curricula promotes sedentary behaviors by requiring children to spend between 6 and 8 hours in seated academic instruction per day. Moreover, current classroom designs (i.e., size of the classroom and interior areas, type of furniture, flooring and room arrangement) optimize student learning and classroom management with little consideration given to physical activity and movement. Yet, simple adjustments to teaching curricula (i.e. coupling physical activity with teacher's existing lessons) and classroom design (e.g. using smart floor planning to restructure spaces in a classroom) can dramatically increase movement and subsequent learning within that space. In partnership with the School of Education and the Taubman College of Architecture \& Urban Planning, two traditionally non-health related fields, the overall objectives of this pilot study are to: 1) develop a classroom curriculum and floor plan that promotes movement, learning and positive behavioral outcomes; and 2) test the feasibility of implementing our classroom-based physical activity intervention (Interrupting Prolonged sitting with ACTivity or INPACT) in three elementary schools (20 classrooms) across the state of Michigan. Third thru fifth grade teachers and students from Columbia Elementary, Estabrook Elementary and Anderson Elementary will be recruited to participate in this pilot study with classroom teachers delivering the physical activity intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity

Keywords

  • classroom
  • prolonged sitting
  • sedentary time
  • time-on-task
  • children
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 3rd thru 6th grade students in participating InPACT classrooms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active classroom

    Twenty elementary school teachers implemented 10, 3-minute moderate-to-vigorous physical activity breaks (50-75% of heart rate maximum), 5 days per week in their classrooms over a 16-week period.

    Behavioral: Active classroom

Interventions

  • BehavioralActive classroom

    30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

    Also known as: InPACT classroom

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (student)

    Direct observation via the System for Observing Play and Leisure Activity in Youth (SOPLAY) was used to assess student physical activity intensity and physical activity minutes completed in the classroom.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (teacher)

    Direct observation via the System for Observing Play and Leisure Activity in Youth (SOPLAY) was used to assess teacher physical activity intensity and physical activity minutes completed in the classroom.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Transition time

    Transition time was assessed via direct observation and was calculated as the amount of time from when the teacher completed instructions to his/her class to prepare for an activity break to when students started engaging in the activity break.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  2. Time-on-task

    Time-on-task was assessed via direct observation and was calculated as the percent of students following the directions of the teacher 30 seconds post activity break.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  3. Physical activity enjoyment

    Teachers distributed the revised Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) to their students to assess enjoyment of participating in the activity breaks.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  4. Physical activity confidence

    Teachers distributed a single-item question from the Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Scale (PASES) to measure physical activity confidence.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

  5. Physical activity heart rate

    Heart rate during physical activity breaks in the classroom was assessed via heart rate monitoring.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Childhood Disparities Research Laboratory
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03256188
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Responsible party
Rebecca Hasson (Assistant Professor, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
Start date
Aug 15, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2016
Completion
Dec 31, 2016
Last update
Aug 21, 2017

Study contacts

Rebecca E Hasson, PhD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion