CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03254992Updated Nov 27, 2017

Real and Virtual Environments in Autism Spectrum Disorder

An interventional study of ASD - Abstract task and ASD - Tangible task in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 15 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-27.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) are known to have difficulty with socio-communicative functioning and restricted or repetitive behaviors or interests, and there is considerable evidence that the majority also struggle with associated emotional problems. Speech is typically delayed or may regress, comprehension is impaired, if not at the word level, then at the level of sentences, nonverbal and verbal language are affected, and pretend play is delayed or absent, some children are nonverbal or have sparse, impoverished, poorly articulated, and grammatical speech. Objective: To assess in which interface has ASD best performance or functionality. Method: Will be evaluated 100 individuals divided into two groups: 50 individuals with diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD-group), aged 7 to 15 years old, males and females; and 50 individuals with typical development (TD-group) matched by age and sex to the ASD-group. Individuals with comorbidities and functional disabilities that would impede the completion of the task were excluded.

Read the detailed description

Will be evaluated 100 individuals divided into two groups: 50 individuals with diagnosis of Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD-group), aged 7 to 15 years old, males and females; and 50 individuals with typical development (TD-group) matched by age and sex to the ASD-group. The ASD-group will be recruited from GAPI - Special Education in São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil, which is a school for children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders.

For a diagnosis of ASD, apart from qualitative alterations in social communication and interaction (criterion A) in addition to stereotyped, repetitive, restricted behavior patterns (criterion B), that present in the early developmental period (criterion C), it is also required that these "symptoms cause clinically significant impairment in social, occupational and other important areas of current functioning" (criterion D), and that they are not better explained otherwise (criterion E). Given this information these items will be taken into consideration and the group was well evaluated.

With the purpose to homogenize the sample, will be only included ASD with the 1st level to 5th education to grade elementary.

Instrument For data collection will be used a gaming software created in partnership with the Information Systems group of School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, EACH-USP.

The game offers task of "Timing" Coincident, which when executed are displayed on the computer screen 10 balls accessing (red light) in sequence until the last ball, which is considered the target (green light). The participant can have immediate feedback of hit or task error by different sounds (Auditory Interaction) and through visual images (Visual Interaction) that change colors, that will be previously shown to him.

Task Coincident Timing In the more tangible button-press task, the individuals will be required to 'intercept' a falling virtual object at the moment it reached the interception point by pressing a button on the computer's keyboard. In the more abstract, less tangible task, they were instructed to 'intercept' the virtual object by making a hand movement (i.e., a waving gesture) in a virtual environment.

The magnitude and direction of each participant's error in anticipating the light's "arrival" at the end of the runway, in milliseconds, is recorded by the game.

Objective the game is to evaluate the difference in time between the participant's execution of the response and the arrival of the object at the target location, overall temporal accuracy, and hence coincidence-anticipation timing skill.

The software provides a "user login" for each research participant, where the following data are stored: Participant name; Date of birth; sex; Pathology type; Researcher name.

Procedures The participants will be positioned comfortably in a chair adjusted according to size and needs along with a footrest so that they will be positioned properly to enable task execution. Before starting the task, the operation of the game will be verbally explained and a demonstration will be offered by the examiner. Runtime will be noted in each experimental stage, as explained below: acquisition (A), retention (R), and transfer (T).

All participants made 20 trial acquisitions, 5 retention trials after 5 minutes with no contact with the task and 5 transfer trials immediately after retention trials. Thus, each participant will have 30 trials. During acquisition and retention trials, the bubbles simulate a dropped light movement with 0.5 seconds between each bubble and 5 seconds between the first and last bubble.

The subjects will perform alternating interfaces for the same task, Kinect for Windows (gesture task with virtual environments), Keyboard (button press with tangible environments), and both groups will carry out the transfer phase on Touch Screen interface. The subjects of each group (ASD and TD) will be divided into 2 groups, group A and group B, according to the order of interfaces to carry out the task; Group A will perform the abstract task (kinect with more virtual activity) and then the tangible task (keyboard with more real activity), and the group B, will perform the reverse process.

02

Conditions studied

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • need to understand the task, assessed by the ability to properly perform three attempts explanatory statement by the evaluator.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • of incomprehension.
  • no completion of the task.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ASD - Abstract task

    Experimental group using Kinect with more virtual activity.

    Device: ASD - Abstract task

  • Experimental
    ASD - Tangible task

    Experimental group using Keyboard with more real activity.

    Device: ASD - Tangible task

  • Active comparator
    TD - Abstract task

    Control group using Kinect with more virtual activity.

    Device: TD - Abstract task

  • Active comparator
    TD - Tangible task

    Control group using Keyboard with more real activity.

    Device: TD - Tangible task

Interventions

  • DeviceASD - Abstract task

    Experimental group using Kinect with more virtual activity.

  • DeviceASD - Tangible task

    Experimental group using Keyboard with more real activity.

  • DeviceTD - Abstract task

    Control group using Kinect with more virtual activity.

  • DeviceTD - Tangible task

    Control group using Keyboard with more real activity.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in performance, measured by coincident timing task

    The participants who will perform the abstract task first, will present decrease on performance, measured by the coincident timing task.

    Time frame: 1 day

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Escola de Artes,Ciencias e Humanidades da Universidade d Sao Paulo
    Sao Paulo, 03828-000, Brazil
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03254992
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Responsible party
Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro (Associate Professor, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2017
Start date
Nov 2, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2017
Completion
Nov 20, 2017
Last update
Nov 27, 2017

Study contacts

Carlos BM Monteiro, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion