An interventional study of Difficulty of catheterization in group 60 s and Difficulty of catheterization in group 90 s in Catheterization, sponsored by Leila mansali stambouli. Completed. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-18.
Sponsored by Leila mansali stambouli · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This interventional simple-blind,randomized trial has included 90 children of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II aged between 1 to 12 years of either sex, scheduled for for outpatient minor surgery under general anesthesia. This study examined whether one should make iv attempts during the early induction period (at 60 seconds) or lately (90 or 120 s) and waiting until the child receives additional sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia.
We conducted a prospective randomized study, after obtaining Institutional review board approval, which didn't require written parental consent. Children age 1-12 years, undergoing elective general anesthesia via an inhalation induction were randomized to one of three groups of 30 patients each one, for iv placement, either 60s (group E), 90 or 120 s (group L) following loss of lid reflex. Movement on iv placement and incidence of laryngospasm were determined. Difficulty with iv placement was also recorded. Statistical analysis included contingency testing, ANOVA, and non parametric testing. A P-value \<0.05 was considered significant.
Exclusion Criteria:
The Time of catheterization at 60s (group E) was applied in this study group,after sevoflurane inhalation induction, 30 children have a catheterization after a time of 60 seconds following the eye closure and the loss of lid reflex.Difficulty with intravenous catheterization, limb movement and laryngospasm were recorded.Difficulty of catheterization in group 60 s
Other: Difficulty of catheterization in group 60 s
In this study group,after sevoflurane inhalation induction, 30 children have a catheterization after a time of 90 seconds following the eye closure and the loss of lid reflex.Difficulty with intravenous catheterization, limb movement and laryngospasm were recorded.Difficulty of catheterization in group 90 s
Other: Difficulty of catheterization in group 90 s
In this study group,after sevoflurane inhalation induction, 30 children have a catheterization after a time of 120 seconds following the eye closure and the loss of lid reflex.Difficulty with intravenous catheterization, limb movement and laryngospasm were recorded.Difficulty of catheterization in group 120 s
Other: Difficulty of catheterization in group 120 s
Success of intravenous insertion
success insertion of intravenous cannula was achieved at the first attempt less than 30 seconds
Time frame: from the end of study period of time after the loss of eyelash reflex to successful cannulation less than 30 seconds
limb movement
The movement was classified using the scale: (0 No movement, 1 movement) The incidence of laryngospasm was defined as the sudden complete or partial loss of air exchange with concurrent loss of a capnographic wave. The movement was classified using the scale: (0 No movement, 1 movement) The incidence of laryngospasm was defined as the sudden complete or partial loss of air exchange with concurrent loss of a capnographic wave. • The movement was classified using the scale: (0 No movement, 1 movement) • The movement was classified using the scale: (0 No movement, 1 movement) The limb movement was classified using the scale:0 No movement, 1 movement)
Time frame: from the end of study period of time after the loss of eyelash reflex to successful cannulation less than 30 seconds
laryngospasm
laryngospasm was defined as the sudden complete or partial loss of air exchange with concurrent loss of a capnographic wave.
Time frame: from the end of study period of time after the loss of eyelash reflex to successful cannulation less than 30 seconds
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.