CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03254264IDEAEYEUpdated Apr 6, 2022

Impact of Early Interventions on Neurocognitive Profile of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

An interventional study of Early Start Denver Model and 'as-usual' intervention in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 15 Months to 36 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-06.

Sponsored by Hôpital le Vinatier · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
one inclusion and not others
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Months to 36 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Early start Denver model (Rogers, 2010; Dawson, 2010) is a developmental and behavioral model that aim to enhance socio-comunicative abilities and also global development of children with Autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this study is to identify changes in neurocognitive profile of children population with ASD receiving Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) applied 12 hours per week in comparison to children receiving other interventions. That is a study proposed to children with ASD and their families that participate already to a randomized control study called IDEA registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT02608333.

the investigators hypothesized that ESDM would increase social cognition, reduce shifting attention time and increase preference for unpredictable stimuli.

Read the detailed description

IDEA is a multicenter (4 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium), randomized, controlled, single blind trial using a modified Zelen design .It concerns children with ASD aged 15 to 36 months without severe neurological or physical disorder and living in the proximity of one the early intervention units. After diagnostic, Children will be included in a longitudinal cohort with the consent of the parents. Sixty children will be drawn lots among 180 children of the cohort and will be included in an ESDM intervention with the consent of the parents. Two groups will be compared: an experimental group of 60 children receiving 12 hours a week of ESDM intervention delivered by trained therapists during 2 years and a control group of 120 children receiving typical heterogeneous 'as-usual' intervention proposed by professionals and public services over the same period. In IDEA development of communication and social interactions and global developmental of all the children will be measured at different time points (at baseline (t0), after 1 year (t1), after 2 years( t2)) over the two years through standardized tests such as Autism diagnostic observation Schedule (ADOS-2), Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS-2).

Children will be included in this second study called IDEA-EYE with parents' consent. Then, preference for biological motion and social scene, shifting attention time and preference for sameness will be measure in both groups with an Eye-tracker Tobii TX 300 at t0,t1 and t2. These measures will also be collected in a group of children without ASD at t0,t1 and t2.

the investigators expect, as primary criteria, a significant superior time spend on biological motion in ESDM group versus control group after 2 years of treatment. the investigators also expect a significant superior orientation toward eyes in complex social scenes, an inferior shifting attention time and a superior preference for unpredictable stimuli in ESDM group versus ASD control group after 2 years. the investigators also expect that ESDM group would have time spend on biological motion, orientation toward eyes in complex scenes, shifting attention time and preference for unpredictable stimuli comparable to children without ASD after 2 years.

This study would allow better understanding of ESDM active principles.

02

Conditions studied

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Months to 36 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Children 15 months to 36 months
  • Children with autism spectrum disorder (according to international criteria, ADI and ADOS)
  • DQ at 30 at least at the Early Learning Mullen Scale
  • Family domiciled within 40 minutes of an early intervention unit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe neurological or physical disorder identified in the child or family that would interfere with intervention
  • Unavailability of the family for regular monitoring of the child by the investigator center
  • Child with a Rett Sd or Childhood disintegrative disorders
  • Visual problems or with eyes in general
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ESDM-12

    an experimental group of 60 children receiving 12 hours a week of Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) intervention delivered by trained therapists during 2 years ESDM is a comprehensive relational, developmental and behavioral intervention.It's described in a manual for Professional and parents.

    Behavioral: Early Start Denver Model

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    a control group of 120 children receiving typical heterogeneous 'as-usual' intervention proposed by professionals and public services over the same period.

    Behavioral: 'as-usual' intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralEarly Start Denver Model

    ESDM is a comprehensive relational, developmental and behavioral intervention. It's described in a manual for professional (Rogers et al, 2010). Children receive ESDM at minimum 12H per week by trained therapist. Therapist work in collaboration with parents (at home) and preschool or nursery.

  • Behavioral'as-usual' intervention

    a control group receiving typical heterogeneous 'as-usual' intervention proposed by professionals and public services over the same period.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome will be the time spent on biological motion in the task of visual preference stimuli.

    2 different types of stimuli (dynamic biological or geometrical movements) are presented in parallel on each part of the screen alternatively (left and/ or right). Child sit at 60 cm from the screen of the Eye-tracker can look towards the one or the other one stimuli.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average proximity from pattern eyes norm in complex social scene task

    A 3-minute cartoon is displayed on a Tobii TX 300 eye-tracker. Inspired by the concept of a heatmap, for each frame of the video "normative" gaze pattern distribution are created by employing kernel density distribution estimation on the raw gaze data of TD individuals (Botev et al., 2009). For each patient we then will calculate the "distance" of his/hers gaze coordinates from this "norm". Thus we will obtain one measure per frame of Proximity from the "norm", which will be then averaged for the duration of the video.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Difference of saccadic latencies between overlap and gap condition

    in a gap/ overlap paradigm displayed on the Tobii TX 300 eye-tracker screen, we will measure the difference of mean of saccadic latencies between the two conditions.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Time spent on unpredictable stimuli

    2 type of stimuli are presented on the Eye-tracker screen : one very predictable stimuli and unpredictable stimuli.

    Time frame: 2 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Hopital Vinatier
    Bron, 69678, France
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03254264
Lead sponsor
Hôpital le Vinatier
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2017
Start date
May 29, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 25, 2022
Completion
Mar 25, 2022
Last update
Apr 6, 2022

Study contacts

GEOFFRAY Marie-Maude, PHD
principal investigator · Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion