CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03243981Updated Oct 1, 2019Results posted

Infrared and Broadband Light for Skin Aging

An interventional study of Sciton SkinTyte (800-1800 nm) with Broadband Light Technology in Aging, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 55 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-01.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2016, registered Jul 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
55 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

In this exploratory study, we hope to learn if treatment of broadband light with infrared light can alter the molecular pathways associated with aging. Secondary exploratory objective is to see if there are any visible effects of this light treatment on human skin.

Read the detailed description

Studies in model organisms suggest that aged cells can be functionally rejuvenated, but whether this concept applies to human skin is unclear. Recently, we applied 3'-end sequencing for expression quantification ("3-seq") to discover the gene expression program associated with human photoaging and intrinsic skin aging (collectively termed "skin aging"), and the impact of broadband light (BBL) treatment. We found significant changes in 2,265 coding and noncoding RNAs, of which 1,293 that became "rejuvenated" after BBL treatment, whereby they became more similar to their expression level in youthful skin. Rejuvenated genes (RGs) included several known key regulators of organismal longevity and their proximal long noncoding RNAs. Hence, BBL treatment can restore gene expression pattern of photo-aged and intrinsically aged human skin to resemble young skin.

However, the duration of these effects and the potential to augment these effects through increases in particular wavelengths of light have not been explored. The Sciton SkinTyte (800-1800nm) is the ideal technology to examine these questions, since this device has been used in the clinical setting to reduce cheek and submental laxity (Gold, 2010). It incorporates the broadband light technology with an emphasis on 590 nm filter to achieve these clinical results.

This study will be conducted in accord with Declaration of Helsinki principles. After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent is obtained, six female participants over the age of 55 years will undergo BBLST treatments to the left forearm. Inclusion criteria included Fitzpatrick skin type II or III, and a global assessment of forearm skin aging consistent with moderate or severe forearm skin aging (modified validated instrument from McKenzie et al., 2011) for treated participants. Treatments will be performed on the Sciton Joule Platform using BBL in Skintyte mode with 590ST filter. On a separate part of the arm that is clearly marked, Skintyte alone will be applied. Untreated areas will also be marked. All markings will be photographed. The same investigator will perform the treatments at 4-week intervals for a total of 3 treatments. At each treatment session, two or more passes were performed. Four weeks after the third BBL treatment, 4 mm skin biopsies will performed by Keys punch technique from the BBLST treated, ST treated and adjacent untreated skin. These specimens will be bisected and placed into either RNAlater (Ambion Cat# AM7022) or formalin solution for with H\&E, von Giesen or PAS staining.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aging
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

    1. Female 2. Age 55 years or older (total 6) 3. Fitzpatrick skin type 2-3 4. Photo-aging at least moderate on the extensor forearms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Unable to understand and sign informed consent form 2. Unable to comply with study procedures 3. Pregnant or lactating 4. Prior treatment to forearms including topical retinoid, laser treatment, photodynamic treatment, prescription topical agents x 1 month 5. Active skin conditions that precluding treatment including zoster, blistering skin disease, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, abnormal scarring, skin cancer in the area of study treatment 6. Currently on hormone based therapy (both systemic and topical)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Open label study-- single arm

    All patients will receive Skintyte treatment as well as Skintyte plus broadband light

    Device: Sciton SkinTyte (800-1800 nm) with Broadband Light Technology

Interventions

  • DeviceSciton SkinTyte (800-1800 nm) with Broadband Light Technology

    This device has been used in the clinical setting to reduce cheek and submental laxity. SkinTyte delivers sequentially pulsed light (800-1200 nm, with a filter enabling focus on 590 nm) and broadband light (which can be turned on or off).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Genes With Significant Change in Gene Transcription

    The endpoint consisted of clinical inspection of biopsies of untreated skin and skin after three treatments. Genes were considered altered if a statistically significant change in transcription of an individual gene was observed between the treated and untreated skin (significance was set at p\<0.01, adjusted for false discovery rate). The values in the table represent the total number of recorded genes with significant change.

    Time frame: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Fine Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

    Wrinkling was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more wrinkling.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 84

  2. Change From Baseline in Coarse Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

    Wrinkling was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more wrinkling.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 84

  3. Change From Baseline in Sagging Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

    Sagging was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more sagging.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 84

  4. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

    Physician global assessment was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more severe skin aging.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 84

  5. Change From Baseline in Cutometry as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

    Elasticity of skin assessment with cutometric probe.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 84

  6. Change From Baseline in Transepidermal Water Loss as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

    Transepidermal water loss assessment with VapoMeter.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 84

07

Results

Posted Oct 1, 2019
Limitations and caveats
The study did not meet its planned sample size.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSkintyte
Started5
Completed5
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Genes With Significant Change in Gene Transcription

The endpoint consisted of clinical inspection of biopsies of untreated skin and skin after three treatments. Genes were considered altered if a statistically significant change in transcription of an individual gene was observed between the treated and untreated skin (significance was set at p\<0.01, adjusted for false discovery rate). The values in the table represent the total number of recorded genes with significant change.

Time frame:
16 weeks
Reported as:
Number · genes
Number of Genes With Significant Change in Gene Transcription
genesBBL + SPL590 vs UntreatedSPL800 (SkinTite 2) vs Untreated
Number of Genes With Significant Change in Gene Transcription18845
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fine Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

Wrinkling was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more wrinkling.

Time frame:
Baseline, day 84
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Fine Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
score on a scaleBBL + SPL590SPL800
Baseline7.8 ± 1.897.5 ± 3.70
Day 845.0 ± 3.465.3 ± 3.20
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Coarse Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

Wrinkling was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more wrinkling.

Time frame:
Baseline, day 84
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Coarse Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
score on a scaleBBL + SPL590SPL800
Baseline5.0 ± 3.656.0 ± 1.83
Day 842.3 ± 2.632.5 ± 1.73
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sagging Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

Sagging was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more sagging.

Time frame:
Baseline, day 84
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Sagging Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
score on a scaleBBL + SPL590SPL800
Baseline7.0 ± 1.637.5 ± 1.91
Day 843.5 ± 1.734.3 ± 2.06
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

Physician global assessment was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more severe skin aging.

Time frame:
Baseline, day 84
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
score on a scaleBBL + SPL590SPL800
Baseline8.3 ± 0.968.3 ± 1.50
Day 845.5 ± 2.086.0 ± 1.83
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Cutometry as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

Elasticity of skin assessment with cutometric probe.

Time frame:
Baseline, day 84

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Transepidermal Water Loss as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation

Transepidermal water loss assessment with VapoMeter.

Time frame:
Baseline, day 84

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 16 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BBL + SPL5900/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
SPL8000/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Untreated0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Skintyte
Mean67.6 ± 6.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Skintyte
Female5
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Skintyte
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino5
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Skintyte
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White5
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University
    Redwood City, California 94063, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 16, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03243981
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
Sciton
Responsible party
Anne Chang (Associate Professor of Dermatology, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2017
Start date
Nov 20, 2016
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2017
Completion
Jun 20, 2017
Results posted
Oct 1, 2019
Last update
Oct 1, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion