CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03199729Updated Jul 8, 2026

Aging and Mixed Perturbation Training to Reduce Falls in Locomotion

An interventional study of Slip-only training and Trip-only training in Older Adults, sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-08.

Sponsored by University of Illinois at Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The long-term objective of this research is to develop an efficacious training paradigm to enhance older adults' defense mechanisms against falls and possibility reduce healthcare cost. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates the direct medical cost for fall related injuries to be $30 billion annually. Slips and trips combined account for more than 50% of the outdoor falls in community-dwelling older adults. These environmental perturbations are opposing in nature, with slips mainly resulting in backward falls and trips in forward falls. This project explores perturbation training through both slip and trip exposure based on the principles of motor learning. The project design consists of a randomized controlled trial to examine the ability of the central nervous system to mitigate the interference in stability control (if any) that is induced by opposing types of perturbations. It also introduces a novel combined slip and trip perturbation training paradigm to enhance one's ability to retain and generalize the acquired fall-prevention skills to both types of falls. Slips and trips induced on an over ground walkway will be used to prepare the motor system to improve stability control and vertical limb support to resist falls. The longer-term benefits of such combined perturbation training over exclusive slip-only or trip-only perturbation training in reducing both laboratory-induced and real life falls will also be assessed. The hypothesis of this study if supported by the results will provide an evidence-supported training protocol to reduce the fall-risk among community-dwelling older adults.

Read the detailed description

Impaired or delayed reactive postural responses pose a potential threat to falls while walking resulting in slips or trips in older and neurologically impaired individuals. Therefore, increase in understanding of postural responses to unexpected external perturbation in older adults and people with neurological diseases will lead to development of new therapeutic approaches for fall prevention in this population. The overall objective of this is to investigate the dynamic stability during slip and trip-like experiences by evaluating the efficiency of recovery responses, retention and fall-risk reduction to slips or trips induced during normal walking in healthy older adults. Participants will be community dwelling ambulatory older adults between the age range of 60 to 90 years. Subjects will be screened for the inclusion criteria. Subjects who qualify will go through clinical balance assessment and dynamic stability training. The older adults will be divided into any of the four groups -1) overground slip only training, 2) overground trip only training, 3) overground combined slip + trip training, or 4) control (single slip + single trip). For both overground slip/trip, all subjects' normal walking pattern and their recovery responses to slip/trip will be recorded with a motion tracking system (including videotaping) while they walk across an instrumented area along a straight path in the lab. A slip will be induced after a subject steps on a low-friction platform. A trip will be induced by introducing an obstacle device while the subject is walking, which consists of a hinged aluminum plate. At 12 months post-training session, the follow-up stability test will consist only of one slip and trip induced on the training side and contralateral side. Incidence of falls and physical activity will be monitored between training and re-test sessions through falls and activity monitoring-questionnaire to describe details of the falls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Older Adults

Keywords

  • Overground training
  • Dynamic Stability
  • Fall risk
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago is the lead sponsor of 515 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 31 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (58%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Community ambulators who use assistive device and are able to walk independently for 8m, healthy older adults between the age group of 60 to 90 years.
  • Absence of any acute or chronic neurological, cardiopulmonary, musculoskeletal or systemic diagnosis.
  • No recent major surgery (\< 6 months) or hospitalization (\< 3 months)
  • Not on any sedative drugs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded if they report presence of pain, osteoporosis or any medical conditions during telephone screening (see Telephone screening form). Also subjects will be excluded if they are on osteoporosis medication, and narcotics/opioids class of drugs under the sedative medications.
  • Individuals classified as osteoporotic with heel bone density measurement with a T-score \< -2 using an ultrasound device.
  • Individuals with mild cognitive impairment (Mini-mental State Exam score \< 25/30)
  • Complain of shortness of breath or uncontrolled pain (> 3/10 on VAS) or pulse oxygen drops \< 92% or are unable to achieve the age-specified minimal ambulation distance during 6 minute walk test.
  • Subjects with body weight more than 250lbs.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Slip-only training

    Overground, slip specific perturbation training only delivered in a fixed sequence. After the baseline walking trials, subjects will walk for 30-35 trials, after which training will begin consisting of a first block of 8 repeated slips (S1-S8), a block of 3 regular (non-perturbed) walking trials (W1-W3), another block of 8 slips (S9-16), a second block of 3 regular walking trials (W4-W6), and a final block of 8 slips (S17-S24) mixed with 10 regular walking trials.

    Other: Slip-only training

  • Experimental
    Trip-only training

    Trip specific training delivered in an identical sequence (mixed with non-trip trials) as the Group with slip only training.

    Other: Trip-only training

  • No intervention
    Control

    Walk for about 70-75 trials at the preferred walking pace to match the total trials the other groups receive before the test perturbations.

  • Experimental
    Combined slip+trip training

    Training consisting of repeated exposure to both slips and trips.

    Other: Combined slip+trip training

Interventions

  • OtherSlip-only training

    Subjects in this arm will receive overground, slip specific perturbation training only. The total perturbation training trials received by this group will be 24 but the protocol will consist of a total of 70-75 trials (to match the training length and time of Combined slip and trip training group).

  • OtherTrip-only training

    Subjects in this arm consisting of a total of 24 trials of trip specific training delivered in an identical sequence (mixed with non-trip trials) as the Group with slip only training.

  • OtherCombined slip+trip training

    Subjects in this arm will receive training consisting of repeated exposure to both slips and trips with a total of 24 slips plus 24 trips to keep the number of trials of each perturbation same as the perturbation specific training groups (slip only and trip only), however, the total dose will be doubled. The total trials walked (perturbed + unperturbed) will be 75.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in laboratory-induced falls

    Perturbation is induced successfully and safely to reproduce inadvertent falls in a protective laboratory environment. Falls will be measured by the amount of body weight supported by the full-body harness system and measured by a load cell attached to this system. Instability of the body's COM and poor limb support prior to touchdown of the recovery step account for 90\~100% of subsequent falls (occurring \~500ms later) in both sit-to-stand-slip and in gait-slip, in the laboratory settings. Intervention consists of repeated perturbation training to induce a change in the laboratory induced falls immediately post-training and examine it's retention 12 months after the initial training session.

    Time frame: Baseline (1st novel slip, week 1), Immediate post-training (after repeated perturation training session, week 1 ) and at 12-month re-test (to determine long-term retention of training).

  2. Real life falls

    Real life falls are measured to determine if training effect can be translated into everyday real life setting.

    Time frame: prospective post-training over next 12 months (total falls tracked and reported at 12 months post-training will be compared between groups)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stability gain (or loss)

    Stability is defined by both the position of a person's center-of-mass (COM) with respect to his or her base-of-support (BOS) and it's velocity.

    Time frame: Baseline (1st novel slip, week 1), Immediate post-training (after repeated perturation training session, week 1) and at 12-month re-test (to determine long-term retention of training).

  2. Limb support gain (or loss)

    The inability to provide timely limb support due to insufficient amount of upward impulse generated from the ground reactive force can cause limb collapse, as characterized by the quotient of amount and rate of hip descent (Vhip/Zhip) measured from hip height and lead to an eventual fall.

    Time frame: Baseline (1st novel slip, week 1), Immediate post-training (after repeated perturation training session, week 1) and at 12-month re-test (to determine long-term retention of training).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bhatt T, Wang Y, Wang S, Kannan L. Perturbation Training for Fall-Risk Reduction in Healthy Older Adults: Interference and Generalization to Opposing Novel Perturbations Post Intervention. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Aug 16;3:697169. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.697169. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34490424 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03199729
Lead sponsor
University of Illinois at Chicago
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Tanvi Bhatt (Assistant Professor, University of Illinois at Chicago) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2017
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2026

Study contacts

Tanvi Bhatt, PhD PT
principal investigator · University of Illinois at Chicago

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion