CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03190655Updated Mar 12, 2018

Efficacy and Safety of Aluminaid Versus Hydrogel Wound Dressings

An interventional study of Aluminaid and Hydrogel in Partial-thickness Burn, sponsored by Melva Louisa. Terminated at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-12.

Sponsored by Melva Louisa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Stopped by the Sponsor due to their change in product development priorities.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2017, registered Jun 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Burn injury is the result of an energy transfer that destroys the skin and adjacent tissues. Partial thickness burn wounds are painful and difficult to manage. The aim of burn treatment in partial thickness burns is to promote rapid wound healing, decrease pain, protect wound from infections, minimize scar formation and functional impairment In recent years, there are progressive development of new dressing material with a variety of option for depth adapted wound management. Many wound dressings are available for superficial and partial thickness burns. Hydrogel based wound dressing provides good biocompatibility with the skin and mucosa and promotes hydration of the wound bed.

Aluminaid wound dressings is a hydrogel based wound dressing that is integrated with aluminium that was designed to reduce acute pain in the treatment of superficial and partical thickness burn injuries.

Up to date, no evidence regarding integrated with aluminium sheet in hydrogel based wound dressings for the use in partial thickness burns. Therefore this trials is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aluminaid versus Hydrogel for the treatment of partial thickness burns.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, open label, active controlled trial that aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aluminaid versus Hydrogel wound dressings in the treatment of partial thickness burns.

The study is a multi center trial in children and adults of 12 - 65 years old with partial thickness burns.

02

Conditions studied

  • Partial-thickness Burn
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Melva Louisa is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults and children of 12 - 65 years old
  • Partial thickness thermal burns of minimally 1% total body surface area (TBSA)
  • Admission of less than 4 hours of burn injury
  • Patients/legal guardian still have the ability to undergo examinations and give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Total body surface area (TBSA) of more than 20%
  • Burns caused by chemicals, electricity or radiation
  • Superficial and partial thickness burns located on the faces, palms, soles, genitalia, perineum and joint areas
  • Superficial and partial thickness burns with compartment syndrome
  • Superficial and partial thickness burns with a history of life-threatening trauma
  • Had concomitant disease such as diabetes mellitus
  • Signs of infected burns
  • Patients with known allergies to product containing aluminium, hydrogel or a history of contact dermatitis
  • Other conditions which according to the investigator's judgment are not appropriate to be included in the study.
  • Treated with other agents before attend to clinic (oil, tooth paste, betadine, rivanol etc)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Aluminaid

    Treatment group: Aluminaid wound dressing

    Device: Aluminaid

  • Active comparator
    Hydrogel

    Hydrogel wound dressing (Trademark: Burnshield)

    Device: Hydrogel

Interventions

  • DeviceAluminaid

    Aluminaid wound dressings is a hydrogel based wound dressing that is integrated with aluminium

  • DeviceHydrogel

    Hydrogel based wound dressing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound healing

    Wound healing as determine by the time of complete re-epithelization of the study area, in days.

    Time frame: Up to 21 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Erythema

    The presence of erythema

    Time frame: at the time of admission up to 30 minutes

  2. Bullae

    The presence of bullae

    Time frame: at the time of admission up to 30 minutes

  3. Pain score

    Pain score is determined by VAS score (1 - 10: 1 is no pain 10 is severe pain).

    Time frame: At the time of admission up to 30 minutes and 1st week of follow up

  4. Adverse events

    The adverse events in patients treated with Aluminaid versus Hydrogel as determined by the proportion of patients who experience adverse events

    Time frame: At the time of admission up to 21 days of follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinic of Clinical Research Supporting Unit
    Jakarta Pusat, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grippaudo FR, Carini L, Baldini R. Procutase versus 1% silver sulphadiazine in the treatment of minor burns. Burns. 2010 Sep;36(6):871-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2009.10.021. Epub 2010 Jan 15. PubMed 20079572 ↗
  • Cancio LC, Lundy JB, Sheridan RL. Evolving changes in the management of burns and environmental injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Aug;92(4):959-86, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2012.06.002. PubMed 22850157 ↗
  • Hettiaratchy S, Dziewulski P. ABC of burns: pathophysiology and types of burns. BMJ. 2004 Jun 12;328(7453):1427-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7453.1427. No abstract available. Erratum In: BMJ. 2004 Jul 17;329(7458):148. PubMed 15191982 ↗
  • Lars PK, Giretzlehner M, Trop M, Parvizi D, Spendel S, Schintler M, Justich I, Wiedner M, Laback C, Lumenta DB. The properties of the "ideal" donor site dressing: results of a worldwide online survey. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013 Sep 30;26(3):136-41. PubMed 24563639 ↗
  • Rowan MP, Cancio LC, Elster EA, Burmeister DM, Rose LF, Natesan S, Chan RK, Christy RJ, Chung KK. Burn wound healing and treatment: review and advancements. Crit Care. 2015 Jun 12;19:243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0961-2. PubMed 26067660 ↗
  • Selig HF, Lumenta DB, Giretzlehner M, Jeschke MG, Upton D, Kamolz LP. The properties of an "ideal" burn wound dressing--what do we need in daily clinical practice? Results of a worldwide online survey among burn care specialists. Burns. 2012 Nov;38(7):960-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 May 8. PubMed 22571855 ↗
  • Serrano C, Boloix-Tortosa R, Gomez-Cia T, Acha B. Features identification for automatic burn classification. Burns. 2015 Dec;41(8):1883-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jul 15. PubMed 26188898 ↗
  • Wasiak J, Cleland H, Campbell F, Spinks A. Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD002106. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002106.pub4. PubMed 23543513 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03190655
Lead sponsor
Melva Louisa
Responsible party
Melva Louisa (Trial Director, Indonesia University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 5, 2018
Completion
Mar 5, 2018
Last update
Mar 12, 2018

Study contacts

Wawaimuli Arozal, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Indonesia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion