CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03180944Updated Jan 10, 2020

Lower Lugol's Solution Concentration on Reducing the Adverse Symptoms of Chromoendoscopy With Iodine Staining

A Phase 2 interventional study of 1.2% Lugol's solution and 1.0% Lugol's solution in Mucosal Irritation and Image Quality, sponsored by Shandong University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 74 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-10.

Sponsored by Shandong University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was to test an optimal concentration of Lugol's solution which can reduce the mucosal irritation and provide high image quality to ensure endoscopy examination by a randomized blinded controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

It is widely accepted that chromoendoscopy using Lugol's solution is effective for the detection of early esophageal squamous neoplasia. However, this modality may cause severe chest pain and discomfort owing to mucosal irritation. The conventional concentration of Lugol's solution is in the range of 1.2% to 2.5% . Image quality can be guaranteed with this range of Lugol's solution. However, lead to retrosternal pain and discomfort, and can even induce erosion or ulceration in the esophagus and stomach. This study was to test whether a lower concentration of Lugol's solution, which has minimal mucosal irritation, can provide satisfied image quality by a randomized blinded controlled trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mucosal Irritation
  • Image Quality

Keywords

  • Lugol's solution
  • esophageal squamous cell cancer
  • mucosal irritation
  • image quality
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • patients in the high-risk population of ESCC;
  • or general risk population of ESCC between 40 to 74 years old. Definition of high-risk population of ESCC is list in supporting information33.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria included the following:

  • with obvious abnormalities in stomach, confirmed by either white-light endoscopy (WLE) or pCLE, including gastric cancer, acute erosive and hemorrhagic gastritis, chronic atrophic gastritis, H. pylori infection and severe bile reflux gastritis;
  • advanced esophageal carcinoma;
  • known esophageal surgery or endoscopic treatment;
  • known esophageal radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
  • esophageal stenosis;
  • food retention;
  • allergy to iodine or fluorescein sodium;
  • hyperthyroid;
  • coagulopathy;
  • acute bleeding;
  • severe organ failure;
  • pregnant or breastfeeding women.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1.2% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 1.2% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.

    Drug: 1.2% Lugol's solution

  • Experimental
    1.0% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 1.0% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.

    Drug: 1.0% Lugol's solution

  • Experimental
    0.8% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 0.8% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.

    Drug: 0.8% Lugol's solution

  • Experimental
    0.6% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 0.6% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.

    Drug: 0.6% Lugol's solution

  • Experimental
    0.4% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 0.4% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.

    Drug: 0.4% Lugol's solution

Interventions

  • Drug1.2% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 1.2% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.

  • Drug1.0% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 1.0% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.

  • Drug0.8% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 0.8% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.

  • Drug0.6% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 0.6% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.

  • Drug0.4% Lugol's solution

    This group patients were given concentrations of 0.4% Lugol's solution for chromoendoscopy.Then biopsy specimens will be taken at the well-demarcated unstained or less-stained lesions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Image Quality

    Image quality is blindly quantified by a 4-point scale from the endoscopists. A higher score representing higher image quality.

    Time frame: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gastric Mucosa Injury

    The gastric mucosal injury caused by Lugol's solution is defined as post-staining gastritis score minus pre-staining gastritis score in pCLE. The confocal gastritis was graded 0 to 3,according to pit patterns, capillaries, and fluorescein leakage. A higher score representing more serious injury.

    Time frame: 1 months

  2. Adverse Events

    Both a written and oral form of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was provided to the patients after the endoscopy examination, used for measuring patients' retrosternal pain, retrosternal discomfort, nausea, abdominal discomfort and others. In NRS, 0 is painless, 10 is the most severe pain, less than 4 is mild pain (pain does not affect sleep), 4-6 is moderate pain, and more than 7 is severe pain (pain means unable to sleep or wake up from sleep).

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Severe Adverse Events

    Severe adverse events includes allergic reactions, esophageal burns, spasms and even perforation.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Tolerance

    The 4-point scale was used to assess the tolerance of endoscopist to the esophageal spasm caused by Lugol's solution which prevent endoscopy from passing. 1-4 means the resistance as intolerable, tolerable, mild, or non-existing.

    Time frame: intraoperative

  5. Histology analysis

    All specimens were evaluated by two experienced pathologists blind to the groups of the patients. The macroscopic and histologic diagnosis were made based on Paris classification and Vienna classification, respectively.

    Time frame: 3-5days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qilu Hospital, Shandong University
    Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03180944
Lead sponsor
Shandong University
Responsible party
Xiuli Zuo (director of Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 8, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2018
Completion
Dec 30, 2018
Last update
Jan 10, 2020

Study contacts

Xiuli Zuo, PhD
principal investigator · Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion