CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03172494DUAL™ I ChinaUpdated Dec 14, 2022Results posted

A Trial Comparing Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide, Insulin Degludec, and Liraglutide in Chinese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Insulin degludec/liraglutide and Insulin degludec in Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S. Completed at 36 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-14.

Sponsored by Novo Nordisk A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
720
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this trial is to confirm the efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide in controlling glycaemia in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic agents

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 720 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S is the lead sponsor of 1,370 studies on the registry; 102 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 94 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus (clinically diagnosed)
  • Male or female, age at least 18 years at the time of signing informed consent
  • HbA1c 7.0-10.0 % (both inclusive) by central laboratory analysis, with the aim of a median of8.3%. When approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have an HbA1c above 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have an HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%; or when approximately 50% of the randomised subjects have an HbA1c below or equal to 8.3%, the remaining subjects randomised must have an HbA1c above 8.3%
  • Current treatment for at least 90 calendar days prior to screening with metformin plus/minus one other OAD: α-glucosidase inhibitors, sulphonylureas, glinides or thiazolidinediones. For above or equal to 60 calendar days prior to screening subjects should be on a stable dose of:
  • Metformin (above or equal to 1500 mg or max tolerated dose) or
  • Metformin (above or equal to 1500 mg or max tolerated dose) and sulphonylureas (above or equal to half of the max approved dose according to local label) or
  • Metformin (above or equal to 1500 mg or max tolerated dose) and glinides (above or equal to half of the max approved dose according to local label) or
  • Metformin (above or equal to 1500 mg or max tolerated dose) and α-glucosidase inhibitors (above or equal to half of the max approved dose according to local label) or
  • Metformin (above or equal to 1500 mg or max tolerated dose) and thiazolidinediones (above or equal to half of the max approved dose according to local label)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with insulin (except for short-term treatment at the discretion of the investigator)
  • Treatment with glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors within 90 days prior to screening
  • Impaired liver function, defined as alanine aminotransferase above or equal to 2.5 times upper normal range
  • Impaired renal function defined as serum-creatinine above or equal to 133 μmol/L for males and above or equal to 125 μmol/L for females, or as defined according to local contraindications for metformin
  • Screening calcitonin above or equal to 50 ng/L
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2)
  • Cardiac disorder defined as: congestive heart failure (NYHA class III-IV), diagnosis of unstable angina pectoris, cerebral stroke and/or myocardial infarction within the last 12 months prior to screening and/or planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation procedures
  • Severe uncontrolled treated or untreated hypertension (systolic blood pressure above or equal to 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure above or equal to 100 mmHg
  • Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy (macular oedema), requiring acute treatment
  • History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
720 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Insulin degludec/liraglutide

    Drug: Insulin degludec/liraglutide

  • Active comparator
    Insulin degludec

    Drug: Insulin degludec

  • Active comparator
    Liraglutide

    Drug: Liraglutide

Interventions

  • DrugInsulin degludec/liraglutide

    Subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin)administration once daily in combination with metformin. For 26 weeks.

  • DrugInsulin degludec

    Subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin)administration once daily in combination with metformin. For 26 weeks.

  • DrugLiraglutide

    Subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin)administration once daily in combination with metformin. For 26 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in HbA1c

    Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight

    Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  2. Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or blood glucose (BG) confirmed by a plasma glucose (PG) value \< 3.1 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes per patient years of exposure (PYE) (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) during 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  3. Insulin Dose

    The actual daily total insulin dose after 26 weeks of treatment is presented. This outcome measure is only applicable for Insulin degludec/liraglutide and Insulin degludec treatment arms.

    Time frame: Week 26

  4. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0%, American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)

    Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \< 7.0%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Week 26

  5. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5%, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Target (Yes/no)

    Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Week 26

  6. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero

    Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \< 7.0%) (yes/no) and change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero after 26 weeks are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

    Time frame: Week 26

  7. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero

    Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) and change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero after 26 weeks are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

    Time frame: Week 26

  8. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \<7.0%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment and without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

    Time frame: Week 26

  9. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment and without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

    Time frame: Week 26

  10. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Episodes, and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero.

    Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \< 7.0%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment and with change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

    Time frame: Week 26

  11. Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Episodes and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero.

    Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment and with change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

    Time frame: Week 26

  12. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  13. Change in Waist Circumferance

    Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumferance after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  14. 9-point SMPG Profile

    Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). 9-point SMPG values at 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Week 26

  15. Change in Mean of 9-point SMPG Profile

    Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). The mean of profile is defined as the area under the profile divided by measurement time and is calculated using the trapezoidal method. Change in mean of the 9-point SMPG profile from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  16. Change in Mean Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PG) Increments

    Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). Post-prandial SMPG increments from before meal to 90 minutes after for breakfast, lunch and dinner were calculated. The mean increment over all meals was derived as the mean of all available meal increments. Change from baseline (week 0) in post-prandial SMPG increments for all meals after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  17. Change in Fasting C-peptide - Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomoles per liter \[nmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  18. Change in Fasting Human Insulin - Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting human insulin (measured in picomoles per liter \[pmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  19. Change in Fasting Glucagon - Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting glucagon (measured in picograms per milliliter \[pg/mL\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  20. Change in HOMA-B (Beta Cell Function)- Ratio to Baseline

    Change in HOMA-B (measured in %) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  21. Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  22. Change in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting HDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  23. Change in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting LDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  24. Change in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting VLDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  25. Change in Fasting Triglycerides - Ratio to Baseline.

    Change in fasting triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  26. Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acid - Ratio to Baseline

    Change in fasting free fatty acid (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  27. Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. The observed rates of adverse events (AEs) per patient years of exposure (PYE) (number of AEs divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks are presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  28. Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes.

    Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as nocturnal if the time of the onset was between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  29. Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes.

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  30. Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

    Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as nocturnal if the time of the onset was between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  31. Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Definition

    A hypoglycaemic episode was defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes (according to the ADA definition) per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

    Time frame: Weeks 0-26

  32. Change in Physical Examination

    Physical examination parameters are categorised as cardiovascular system; central and peripheral nervous system; gastrointestinal system including mouth; general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; lymph node palpation; musculoskeletal system; respiratory system; skin and thyroid gland. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at screening (week -2) and week 26 per each category is presented.

    Time frame: Week -2, week 26

  33. Eye Examination

    Dilated fundoscopy or fundus photography was performed by the investigator at screening (week -2) and week 26. The results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left and right) and are categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each category at screening (week -2) and week 26 is presented.

    Time frame: Week -2, Week 26

  34. Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Electrocardiogram was assessed by the investigator as normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS. Number of participants at screening (week -2) and at week 26 is presented.

    Time frame: Week -2, week 26

  35. Change in Pulse

    Change in pulse from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  36. Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)

    Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  37. Change in Biochemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase, Amalyse, Lipase, Creatiine Kinase Serum

    Change in alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, creatine kinase, amylase, lipase, creatine kinase serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  38. Change in Biochemistry Parameters (Albumin Serum, Total Protein)

    Change in total protein, albumin serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  39. Change in Biochemistry Parameters: Calcium Serum (Total), Calcium Corrected Serum, Potassium Serum, Sodium Serum, Urea Serum

    Change in calcium serum (total), calcium corrected serum, potassium serum, sodium serum, urea serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  40. Change in Biochemistry Parameters: Total Bilirubin Serum, Creatinine Serum

    Change in total bilirubin serum, creatinine serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  41. Change in Haematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Blood

    Change in erythrocyte blood from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  42. Change in Haematological Parameter: Haematocrits

    Change in haematocrits from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  43. Change in Haemotological Parameter- Eosinophils

    Change in eosinophils from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  44. Change in Haematological Parameter - Neutrophils

    Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  45. Change in Haematological Parameter: Basophils

    Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  46. Change in Haemotological Parameter- Monocytes

    Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  47. Change in Haematological Parameter - Lymphocytes

    Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  48. Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin Blood

    Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  49. Change in Haematologcal Parameter: Leukocytes

    Change in leukocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  50. Change in Haematological Parameter: Thrombocytes

    Change in thrombocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  51. Change in Calcitonin

    Calcitonin levels were measured and were categorised as low, normal or high in relation to reference range (8.31- 14.3 picogram/milliliter \[pg/mL\]). Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 26 are presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  52. Urinalysis (Protein, Glucose, Erythrocytes and Ketones)

    The urinalysis assessment was the measurements of protein, glucose, erythrocytes and ketones in urine at baseline (week 0) and week 26 and categorised as negative, trace and positive. Number of participants in each category at week 0 and week 26 is presented.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  53. Occurence of Anti-insulin Degludec Specific Antibodies

    This outcome measure is only applicable for the insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and insulin degludec arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of anti-insulin degludec specific antibodies. Results at week 27 are presented as percentage of bound radioactive-labelled insulin (B) /total radioactive-labelled insulin added to the samples (T).

    Time frame: Week 27

  54. Occurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Human Insulin

    This outcome measure is only applicable for the insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and insulin degludec arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of cross-reacting antibodies to human insulin. Results at week 27 are presented as percentage of bound radioactive-labelled insulin (B) /total radioactive-labelled insulin added to the samples (T).

    Time frame: Week 27

  55. Occurence of Total Insulin Antibodies

    This outcome measure is only applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and Insulin degludec arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of antobodies to human insulin. Results at week 27 are presented as percentage of bound radioactive-labelled insulin (B) /total radioactive-labelled insulin added to the samples (T).

    Time frame: Week 27

  56. Occurence of Anti-liraglutide Antibodies

    This outcome measure is applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and the liraglutide arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of anti-liraglutide antibodies. Number of participants who were assessed for anti-liraglutide antibodies at week 27 are presented.

    Time frame: Week 27

  57. Occurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP-1)

    This outcome measure is applicable to the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and the liraglutide arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of cross-reacting antibodies to native GLP-1. Number of participants who measured with anti-liraglutide antibodies cross reacting native GLP-1 at week 27 are presented.

    Time frame: Week 27

  58. Occurence of Neutralising Liraglutide Antibodies

    This outcome measure is only applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and liraglutide arm. Neutralising antibodies were assessed when the corresponding anti-Liraglutide antibody were positive at week 27. Number of participants who measured with neutralising liraglutide antibodies at week 27 are presented.

    Time frame: Week 27

  59. Occurence of Neutralising Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native GLP-1

    This outcome measure is only applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and liraglutide arm. Cross reacting antibodies were assessed when anti-liraglutide antibody was positive. Number of participants who measured with neutralising liraglutide antibodies cross-reacting to native GLP-1 at week 27 are presented.

    Time frame: Week 27

  60. Serum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec

    This outcome measure is applicable for Insulin degludec and Insulin degludec/liraglutide arms. Serum samples from the Insulin degludec/liraglutide and Insulin degludec arms were assayed using population PK analysis. The maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) are summarised for the two arms.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

  61. Plasma Concentration of Liraglutide

    This outcome measure is for Insulin degludec/liraglutide and liraglutide arms. Serum samples from the Insulin degludec/liraglutide and liraglutide arms were assayed using population PK analysis. The Cmax are summarised for the two arms.

    Time frame: Week 0, week 26

07

Results

Posted Jul 7, 2020

Participant flow

The trial was conducted at 38 sites in China mainland.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Started361179180
Full analysis set (fas)361179180
Safety analysis set (sas)358175180
Exposed358175180
Completed341167151
Not completed201229
Withdrew: Adverse event5115
Withdrew: Protocol violation321
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy004
Withdrew: Pregnancy010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1088
Withdrew: Severe hypoglycaemic episode001
Withdrew: Non-compliance towards treatment200

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in HbA1c

Change in HbA1c from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage points of HbA1c
Change in HbA1c
Percentage points of HbA1cInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in HbA1c-1.71 ± 0.88-1.20 ± 0.99-1.16 ± 0.89
Statistical analysis
  • Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide vs Insulin Degludec · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean treatment difference: -0.59 · 95% CI -0.73 to -0.46
  • Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide vs Liraglutide · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean treatment difference: -0.63 · 95% CI -0.76 to -0.49
SecondaryChange in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Kilogram (Kg)
Change in Body Weight
Kilogram (Kg)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Body Weight0.2 ± 2.71.3 ± 2.7-2.5 ± 2.7
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or blood glucose (BG) confirmed by a plasma glucose (PG) value \< 3.1 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes per patient years of exposure (PYE) (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) during 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · (Number of episodes/PYE)*100
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
(Number of episodes/PYE)*100Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes23.9417.013.60
SecondaryInsulin Dose

The actual daily total insulin dose after 26 weeks of treatment is presented. This outcome measure is only applicable for Insulin degludec/liraglutide and Insulin degludec treatment arms.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Units of insulin (U)
Insulin Dose
Units of insulin (U)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Degludec
Insulin Dose24.8 ± 11.930.1 ± 14.4
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0%, American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)

Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \< 7.0%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0%, American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target (Yes/no)
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes2728380
No698471
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5%, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Target (Yes/no)

Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5%, International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Target (Yes/no)
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes2014841
No140119110
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero

Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \< 7.0%) (yes/no) and change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero after 26 weeks are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0% and Change in Body Weight From Baseline Below or Equal to Zero
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes1473474
No214145106
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero

Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) and change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero after 26 weeks are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes1112137
No250158143
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \<7.0%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment and without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% Without Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes2658084
No969996
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment and without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes1954643
No166133137
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Episodes, and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero.

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved ADA HbA1c target (HbA1c \< 7.0%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment and with change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c < 7.0% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Episodes, and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero.
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes1363372
No225146108
SecondaryParticipants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Episodes and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero.

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Number of participants who achieved IDF HbA1c target (HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) (yes/no) after 26 weeks of treatment without severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes during the last 12 weeks of treatment and with change from baseline in body weight below or equal to zero are presented. Missing values are imputed by LOCF.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants Who Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% Without Severe or BG Confirmed Episodes and Change From Baseline in Body Weight Below or Equal to Zero.
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Yes1032136
No258158144
SecondaryChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Change from baseline (week 0) in FPG after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-3.64 ± 2.27-3.45 ± 2.34-1.86 ± 2.11
SecondaryChange in Waist Circumferance

Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumferance after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Centimeters (cm)
Change in Waist Circumferance
Centimeters (cm)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Waist Circumferance-0.3 ± 3.41.2 ± 4.2-2.6 ± 3.8
Secondary9-point SMPG Profile

Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). 9-point SMPG values at 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Week 26
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
9-point SMPG Profile
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Before breakfast5.41 ± 1.075.66 ± 1.206.89 ± 1.37
90 minutes after the start of breakfast8.97 ± 2.489.85 ± 2.7310.04 ± 2.81
Before lunch6.31 ± 1.807.10 ± 2.357.48 ± 2.14
90 minutes after the start of the lunch8.87 ± 2.1510.18 ± 2.819.54 ± 2.43
Before dinner6.52 ± 1.777.39 ± 2.237.50 ± 2.11
90 minutes after start of the dinner9.33 ± 2.4010.27 ± 2.689.45 ± 2.13
At bedtime7.99 ± 2.288.86 ± 2.388.49 ± 2.26
At 4:00 am5.60 ± 1.266.12 ± 1.756.86 ± 1.60
Before breakfast the following day5.35 ± 0.965.47 ± 1.076.81 ± 1.47
SecondaryChange in Mean of 9-point SMPG Profile

Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). The mean of profile is defined as the area under the profile divided by measurement time and is calculated using the trapezoidal method. Change in mean of the 9-point SMPG profile from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in Mean of 9-point SMPG Profile
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Mean of 9-point SMPG Profile-3.17 ± 2.16-2.47 ± 2.14-2.13 ± 2.02
SecondaryChange in Mean Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PG) Increments

Participants measured their PG levels using blood glucose meters at 9 time points (before breakfast, 90 minutes after the start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after the start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after the start of dinner, at bedtime, at 4 am, before breakfast the following day). Post-prandial SMPG increments from before meal to 90 minutes after for breakfast, lunch and dinner were calculated. The mean increment over all meals was derived as the mean of all available meal increments. Change from baseline (week 0) in post-prandial SMPG increments for all meals after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in Mean Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PG) Increments
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Mean Post-prandial Plasma Glucose (PG) Increments-0.20 ± 2.400.09 ± 2.40-0.54 ± 2.57
SecondaryChange in Fasting C-peptide - Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting C-peptide (measured in nanomoles per liter \[nmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting C-peptide
Change in Fasting C-peptide - Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting C-peptideInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting C-peptide - Ratio to Baseline0.54 ± 52.80.38 ± 68.50.98 ± 37.6
SecondaryChange in Fasting Human Insulin - Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting human insulin (measured in picomoles per liter \[pmol/L\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting human insulin
Change in Fasting Human Insulin - Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting human insulinInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Human Insulin - Ratio to Baseline0.53 ± 71.70.38 ± 77.61.04 ± 53.3
SecondaryChange in Fasting Glucagon - Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting glucagon (measured in picograms per milliliter \[pg/mL\]) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting glucagon
Change in Fasting Glucagon - Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting glucagonInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Glucagon - Ratio to Baseline0.90 ± 76.60.95 ± 56.40.98 ± 75.9
SecondaryChange in HOMA-B (Beta Cell Function)- Ratio to Baseline

Change in HOMA-B (measured in %) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of HOMA-B (beta cell function)
Change in HOMA-B (Beta Cell Function)- Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of HOMA-B (beta cell function)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in HOMA-B (Beta Cell Function)- Ratio to Baseline1.38 ± 77.30.94 ± 77.41.53 ± 63.8
SecondaryChange in Fasting Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting total cholesterol
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting total cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline0.94 ± 19.10.99 ± 16.80.97 ± 17.7
SecondaryChange in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting HDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting HDL cholesterol
Change in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting HDL cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline1.01 ± 14.71.02 ± 15.71.03 ± 14.8
SecondaryChange in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting LDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting LDL cholesterol
Change in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting LDL cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline0.92 ± 34.21.01 ± 36.20.96 ± 34.4
SecondaryChange in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting VLDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting VLDL cholesterol
Change in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting VLDL cholesterolInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol- Ratio to Baseline0.90 ± 49.90.84 ± 47.20.92 ± 38.6
SecondaryChange in Fasting Triglycerides - Ratio to Baseline.

Change in fasting triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting triglycerides
Change in Fasting Triglycerides - Ratio to Baseline.
Ratio of fasting triglyceridesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Triglycerides - Ratio to Baseline.0.88 ± 54.40.82 ± 50.50.90 ± 45.2
SecondaryChange in Fasting Free Fatty Acid - Ratio to Baseline

Change in fasting free fatty acid (measured in mmol/L) from baseline (week 0) to week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Ratio of fasting free fatty acid
Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acid - Ratio to Baseline
Ratio of fasting free fatty acidInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Fasting Free Fatty Acid - Ratio to Baseline0.55 ± 69.90.48 ± 76.50.80 ± 69.3
SecondaryNumber of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to randomised treatment and no later than 7 days after the last day of randomised treatment. The observed rates of adverse events (AEs) per patient years of exposure (PYE) (number of AEs divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks are presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · (Number of AEs/PYE)*100
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
(Number of AEs/PYE)*100Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)410.82306.19541.00
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes.

Severe or BG confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \< 3.1 mmol/L with or without symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as nocturnal if the time of the onset was between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · (Number of episodes/PYE)*100
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes.
(Number of episodes/PYE)*100Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes.4.454.54—
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes.

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · (Number of episodes/PYE)*100
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes.
(Number of episodes/PYE)*100Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Number of Treatment Emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes.15.039.071.20
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as episodes that were severe according to the ADA classification (requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other corrective actions) or BG confirmed by a PG value \<3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as treatment-emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 calendar days after the last day on trial product. Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as nocturnal if the time of the onset was between 00:01 and 05.59 both inclusive. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · (Number of episodes/PYE)*100
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes
(Number of episodes/PYE)*100Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Number of Treatment Emergent Nocturnal Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes2.783.40—
SecondaryNumber of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Definition

A hypoglycaemic episode was defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode occurred on or after the first day of trial product administration, and no later than 7 days after the last day on trial product. The number of episodes are represented as rates. The observed rates of episodes (according to the ADA definition) per PYE (number of episodes divided by PYE multiplied by 100) after 26 weeks of treatment are presented.

Time frame:
Weeks 0-26
Reported as:
Number · (Number of episodes/PYE)*100
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Definition
(Number of episodes/PYE)*100Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Number of Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes According to ADA Definition668.55746.2037.19
SecondaryChange in Physical Examination

Physical examination parameters are categorised as cardiovascular system; central and peripheral nervous system; gastrointestinal system including mouth; general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; lymph node palpation; musculoskeletal system; respiratory system; skin and thyroid gland. The number of participants assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS) and abnormal clinically significant (CS) at screening (week -2) and week 26 per each category is presented.

Time frame:
Week -2, week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Physical Examination
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Week -2: Cardiovascular system — Normal353173180
Week -2: Cardiovascular system — Abnormal, NCS220
Week -2: Cardiovascular system — Abnormal CS300
Week 26: Cardiovascular system — Normal336166151
Week 26: Cardiovascular system — Abnormal, NCS310
Week 26: Cardiovascular system — Abnormal CS200
Week -2: Central and peripheral nervous system — Normal355172179
Week -2: Central and peripheral nervous system — Abnormal, NCS100
Week -2: Central and peripheral nervous system — Abnormal CS231
Week 26: Central and peripheral nervous system — Normal338164150
Week 26: Central and peripheral nervous system — Abnormal, NCS100
Week 26: Central and peripheral nervous system — Abnormal CS231
Week -2: Gastrointestinal system including mouth — Normal355174179
Week -2: Gastrointestinal system including mouth — Abnormal, NCS311
Week -2: Gastrointestinal system including mouth — Abnormal CS000
Week 26: Gastrointestinal system including mouth — Normal339166150
Week 26: Gastrointestinal system including mouth — Abnormal, NCS211
Week 26: Gastrointestinal system including mouth — Abnormal CS000
Week -2: General appearance — Normal351169177
Week -2: General appearance — Abnormal, NCS321
Week -2: General appearance — Abnormal CS442
Week 26: General appearance — Normal336161150
Week 26: General appearance — Abnormal, NCS220
Week 26: General appearance — Abnormal CS341
Week -2: Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck — Normal348170175
Week -2: Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck — Abnormal, NCS643
Week -2: Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck — Abnormal CS412
Week 26: Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck — Normal332164150
Week 26: Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck — Abnormal, NCS631
Week 26: Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck — Abnormal CS300
Week -2: Lymph node palpation — Normal357174180
Week -2: Lymph node palpation — Abnormal, NCS000
Week -2: Lymph node palpation — Abnormal CS110
Week 26: Lymph node palpation — Normal340166151
Week 26: Lymph node palpation — Abnormal, NCS000
Week 26: Lymph node palpation — Abnormal CS110
Week -2: Musculoskeletal system — Normal353172177
Week -2: Musculoskeletal system — Abnormal, NCS220
Week -2: Musculoskeletal system — Abnormal CS313
Week 26: Musculoskeletal system — Normal332165149
Week 26: Musculoskeletal system — Abnormal, NCS210
Week 26: Musculoskeletal system — Abnormal CS712
Week-2: Respiratory system — Normal358175180
Week-2: Respiratory system — Abnormal, NCS000
Week-2: Respiratory system — Abnormal CS000
Week 26: Respiratory system — Normal341167151
Week 26: Respiratory system — Abnormal, NCS000
Week 26: Respiratory system — Abnormal CS000
week -2: Skin — Normal312152156
week -2: Skin — Abnormal, NCS372020
week -2: Skin — Abnormal CS934
Week 26: Skin — Normal297146134
Week 26: Skin — Abnormal, NCS361915
Week 26: Skin — Abnormal CS822
Week -2: Thyroid gland — Normal348171179
Week -2: Thyroid gland — Abnormal, NCS511
Week -2: Thyroid gland — Abnormal CS530
Week 26: Thyroid gland — Normal334163151
Week 26: Thyroid gland — Abnormal, NCS320
Week 26: Thyroid gland — Abnormal CS420
SecondaryEye Examination

Dilated fundoscopy or fundus photography was performed by the investigator at screening (week -2) and week 26. The results of the examination were interpreted for each eye (left and right) and are categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of participants in each category at screening (week -2) and week 26 is presented.

Time frame:
Week -2, Week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Eye Examination
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Week -2: Left eye — Normal222109110
Week -2: Left eye — Abnormal, NCS451420
Week -2: Left eye — Abnormal, CS915250
Week 26: Left eye — Normal21799100
Week 26: Left eye — Abnormal, NCS392013
Week 26: Left eye — Abnormal, CS854838
Week -2: Right eye — Normal230112111
Week -2: Right eye — Abnormal, NCS421622
Week -2: Right eye — Abnormal, CS864747
Week 26: Right eye — Normal21710396
Week 26: Right eye — Abnormal, NCS402315
Week 26: Right eye — Abnormal, CS844140
SecondaryChange in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Electrocardiogram was assessed by the investigator as normal, abnormal NCS and abnormal CS. Number of participants at screening (week -2) and at week 26 is presented.

Time frame:
Week -2, week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Week -2 — Normal223109108
Week -2 — Abnormal, NCS944652
Week -2 — Abnormal CS412020
Week 26 — Normal22710887
Week 26 — Abnormal, NCS764740
Week 26 — Abnormal CS381224
SecondaryChange in Pulse

Change in pulse from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minuts (beats/min)
Change in Pulse
Beats per minuts (beats/min)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Pulse4.6 ± 8.6-0.1 ± 8.64.9 ± 9.7
SecondaryChange in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)

Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Millimeters of mercury (mmHg)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Systolic blood pressure-3.5 ± 12.7-1.2 ± 11.7-3.3 ± 13.8
Distolic blood pressure-0.4 ± 8.3-0.7 ± 8.10.0 ± 8.4
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase, Amalyse, Lipase, Creatiine Kinase Serum

Change in alkaline phosphatase, ALT, AST, creatine kinase, amylase, lipase, creatine kinase serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Units per liter (U/L)
Change in Biochemistry Parameters: Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Creatine Kinase, Amalyse, Lipase, Creatiine Kinase Serum
Units per liter (U/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Alkaline phosphatase-2.0 ± 14.85-2.29 ± 11.49-0.48 ± 14.11
ALT-4.63 ± 13.06-6.17 ± 13.54-2.81 ± 16.97
AST-1.31 ± 7.94-2.65 ± 8.40-0.99 ± 9.64
Creatine kinase10.67 ± 100.8715.37 ± 52.990.52 ± 56.20
Amylase9.84 ± 36.735.09 ± 14.685.68 ± 13.70
Lipase16.13 ± 101.19-1.87 ± 15.6414.11 ± 19.76
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameters (Albumin Serum, Total Protein)

Change in total protein, albumin serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · grams per decileter (g/dL)
Change in Biochemistry Parameters (Albumin Serum, Total Protein)
grams per decileter (g/dL)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Albumin serum-0.05 ± 0.28-0.09 ± 0.260.04 ± 0.26
Total protein-0.08 ± 0.42-0.08 ± 0.39-0.01 ± 0.39
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameters: Calcium Serum (Total), Calcium Corrected Serum, Potassium Serum, Sodium Serum, Urea Serum

Change in calcium serum (total), calcium corrected serum, potassium serum, sodium serum, urea serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in Biochemistry Parameters: Calcium Serum (Total), Calcium Corrected Serum, Potassium Serum, Sodium Serum, Urea Serum
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Calcium serum (total)-0.01 ± 0.10-0.02 ± 0.10-0.00 ± 0.09
Calcium corrected serum-0.00 ± 0.08-0.00 ± 0.08-0.01 ± 0.07
Sodium serum1.21 ± 2.090.98 ± 2.370.32 ± 2.12
Urea serum0.05 ± 0.570.03 ± 0.530.16 ± 0.67
Potassium serum-0.04 ± 0.34-0.09 ± 0.39-0.04 ± 0.34
SecondaryChange in Biochemistry Parameters: Total Bilirubin Serum, Creatinine Serum

Change in total bilirubin serum, creatinine serum from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · micromoles per liter (umol/L)
Change in Biochemistry Parameters: Total Bilirubin Serum, Creatinine Serum
micromoles per liter (umol/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Total bilirubin-0.78 ± 3.35-0.55 ± 4.52-1.16 ± 3.92
creatinine serum1.02 ± 8.411.36 ± 7.92-0.60 ± 7.89
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Blood

Change in erythrocyte blood from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · 10^12 cells per liter (10^12/L)
Change in Haematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Blood
10^12 cells per liter (10^12/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematological Parameter: Erythrocytes Blood-0.05 ± 0.27-0.00 ± 0.27-0.05 ± 0.25
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter: Haematocrits

Change in haematocrits from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage points (%) of red blood cells
Change in Haematological Parameter: Haematocrits
Percentage points (%) of red blood cellsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematological Parameter: Haematocrits-0.56 ± 2.65-0.49 ± 2.69-0.42 ± 2.57
SecondaryChange in Haemotological Parameter- Eosinophils

Change in eosinophils from baseline after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · % of eosinophils
Change in Haemotological Parameter- Eosinophils
% of eosinophilsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haemotological Parameter- Eosinophils-0.06 ± 1.900.19 ± 1.730.11 ± 1.94
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter - Neutrophils

Change in neutrophils from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · % of neutrophils
Change in Haematological Parameter - Neutrophils
% of neutrophilsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematological Parameter - Neutrophils0.57 ± 6.460.18 ± 7.70-0.53 ± 7.05
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter: Basophils

Change in basophils from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · % of basophils
Change in Haematological Parameter: Basophils
% of basophilsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematological Parameter: Basophils-0.02 ± 0.29-0.01 ± 0.28-0.03 ± 0.26
SecondaryChange in Haemotological Parameter- Monocytes

Change in monocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · % of monocytes
Change in Haemotological Parameter- Monocytes
% of monocytesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haemotological Parameter- Monocytes-0.03 ± 1.920.01 ± 1.850.05 ± 2.13
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter - Lymphocytes

Change in lymphocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · % of lymphocytes
Change in Haematological Parameter - Lymphocytes
% of lymphocytesInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematological Parameter - Lymphocytes-0.46 ± 6.04-0.38 ± 7.120.40 ± 6.11
SecondaryChange in Haematology: Haemoglobin Blood

Change in haemoglobin from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · mmol/L
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin Blood
mmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematology: Haemoglobin Blood-0.10 ± 0.53-0.06 ± 0.48-0.05 ± 0.47
SecondaryChange in Haematologcal Parameter: Leukocytes

Change in leukocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter (10^9/L)
Change in Haematologcal Parameter: Leukocytes
10^9 cells per liter (10^9/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematologcal Parameter: Leukocytes0.25 ± 1.180.23 ± 1.41-0.01 ± 1.14
SecondaryChange in Haematological Parameter: Thrombocytes

Change in thrombocytes from baseline (week 0) after 26 weeks of treatment

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Mean · 10^9 cells per liter (10^9/L)
Change in Haematological Parameter: Thrombocytes
10^9 cells per liter (10^9/L)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Change in Haematological Parameter: Thrombocytes8.19 ± 28.028.32 ± 34.484.32 ± 33.39
SecondaryChange in Calcitonin

Calcitonin levels were measured and were categorised as low, normal or high in relation to reference range (8.31- 14.3 picogram/milliliter \[pg/mL\]). Number of participants in each category at baseline (week 0) and week 26 are presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Calcitonin
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Week 0 — Low000
Week 0 — Normal351172178
Week 0 — High732
Week 26 — Low000
Week 26 — Normal334165147
Week 26 — High623
SecondaryUrinalysis (Protein, Glucose, Erythrocytes and Ketones)

The urinalysis assessment was the measurements of protein, glucose, erythrocytes and ketones in urine at baseline (week 0) and week 26 and categorised as negative, trace and positive. Number of participants in each category at week 0 and week 26 is presented.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Urinalysis (Protein, Glucose, Erythrocytes and Ketones)
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Week 0: Erythrocytes — Negative299153156
Week 0: Erythrocytes — Trace361616
Week 0: Erythrocytes — Positive2268
Week 26: Erythrocytes — Negative297146136
Week 26: Erythrocytes — Trace281611
Week 26: Erythrocytes — Positive1454
Week 0: Glucose — Negative253119123
Week 0: Glucose — Trace351918
Week 0: Glucose — Positive693739
Week 26: Glucose — Negative322157131
Week 26: Glucose — Trace1135
Week 26: Glucose — Positive6715
Week 0: Ketones — Negative325152167
Week 0: Ketones — Trace252011
Week 0: Ketones — Positive732
Week 26: Ketones — Negative334163141
Week 26: Ketones — Trace4310
Week 26: Ketones — Positive110
Week 0: Protein — Negative216104116
Week 0: Protein — Trace864037
Week 0: Protein — Positive553127
Week 26: Protein — Negative254120105
Week 26: Protein — Trace582628
Week 26: Protein — Positive272118
SecondaryOccurence of Anti-insulin Degludec Specific Antibodies

This outcome measure is only applicable for the insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and insulin degludec arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of anti-insulin degludec specific antibodies. Results at week 27 are presented as percentage of bound radioactive-labelled insulin (B) /total radioactive-labelled insulin added to the samples (T).

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Mean · %B/T
Occurence of Anti-insulin Degludec Specific Antibodies
%B/TInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Degludec
Occurence of Anti-insulin Degludec Specific Antibodies0.22 ± 1.020.12 ± 0.79
SecondaryOccurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Human Insulin

This outcome measure is only applicable for the insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and insulin degludec arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of cross-reacting antibodies to human insulin. Results at week 27 are presented as percentage of bound radioactive-labelled insulin (B) /total radioactive-labelled insulin added to the samples (T).

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Mean · %B/T
Occurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Human Insulin
%B/TInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Degludec
Occurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Human Insulin6.61 ± 15.002.99 ± 10.89
SecondaryOccurence of Total Insulin Antibodies

This outcome measure is only applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and Insulin degludec arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of antobodies to human insulin. Results at week 27 are presented as percentage of bound radioactive-labelled insulin (B) /total radioactive-labelled insulin added to the samples (T).

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Mean · %B/T
Occurence of Total Insulin Antibodies
%B/TInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Degludec
Occurence of Total Insulin Antibodies6.83 ± 15.783.11 ± 11.42
SecondaryOccurence of Anti-liraglutide Antibodies

This outcome measure is applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and the liraglutide arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of anti-liraglutide antibodies. Number of participants who were assessed for anti-liraglutide antibodies at week 27 are presented.

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurence of Anti-liraglutide Antibodies
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideLiraglutide
Yes4540
No287120
SecondaryOccurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP-1)

This outcome measure is applicable to the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and the liraglutide arm. Serum samples were analysed for the presence of cross-reacting antibodies to native GLP-1. Number of participants who measured with anti-liraglutide antibodies cross reacting native GLP-1 at week 27 are presented.

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP-1)
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideLiraglutide
Occurence of Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native Glucagon-like Peptide (GLP-1)63
SecondaryOccurence of Neutralising Liraglutide Antibodies

This outcome measure is only applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and liraglutide arm. Neutralising antibodies were assessed when the corresponding anti-Liraglutide antibody were positive at week 27. Number of participants who measured with neutralising liraglutide antibodies at week 27 are presented.

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurence of Neutralising Liraglutide Antibodies
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideLiraglutide
Occurence of Neutralising Liraglutide Antibodies98
SecondaryOccurence of Neutralising Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native GLP-1

This outcome measure is only applicable for the Insulin degludec/liraglutide arm and liraglutide arm. Cross reacting antibodies were assessed when anti-liraglutide antibody was positive. Number of participants who measured with neutralising liraglutide antibodies cross-reacting to native GLP-1 at week 27 are presented.

Time frame:
Week 27
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurence of Neutralising Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native GLP-1
ParticipantsInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideLiraglutide
Occurence of Neutralising Antibodies Cross-reacting to Native GLP-100
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec

This outcome measure is applicable for Insulin degludec and Insulin degludec/liraglutide arms. Serum samples from the Insulin degludec/liraglutide and Insulin degludec arms were assayed using population PK analysis. The maximum serum concentrations (Cmax) are summarised for the two arms.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · pmol/L
Serum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec
pmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin Degludec
Serum Concentrations of Insulin Degludec3583 ± 55.94133 ± 52.8
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Liraglutide

This outcome measure is for Insulin degludec/liraglutide and liraglutide arms. Serum samples from the Insulin degludec/liraglutide and liraglutide arms were assayed using population PK analysis. The Cmax are summarised for the two arms.

Time frame:
Week 0, week 26
Reported as:
Geometric mean · pmol/L
Plasma Concentration of Liraglutide
pmol/LInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideLiraglutide
Plasma Concentration of Liraglutide9963 ± 50.421602 ± 37

Adverse events

Collected over Weeks 0-30. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide0/358 (0%)14/358 (3.9%)161/358 (45%)
Insulin Degludec0/175 (0%)7/175 (4%)55/175 (31.4%)
Liraglutide0/180 (0%)14/180 (7.8%)98/180 (54.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 33
Most frequent serious events
EventInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders1/3580/1753/180
Angina unstableCardiac disorders2/3581/1750/180
Cataract operationSurgical and medical procedures0/3581/1750/180
Chronic gastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/3581/1750/180
Deafness neurosensoryEar and labyrinth disorders0/3581/1750/180
Diabetes mellitus inadequate controlMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/3581/1750/180
Dupuytren's contractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/3581/1750/180
Foot fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/3581/1750/180
TinnitusEar and labyrinth disorders0/3581/1750/180
Appendicitis perforatedInfections and infestations0/3580/1751/180
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInsulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutide
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations66/35831/17518/180
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders13/3582/17526/180
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders23/3583/17526/180
Lipase increasedInvestigations27/3585/17522/180
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/3581/17521/180
Diabetic retinopathyEye disorders28/3586/17510/180
Gastrointestinal disorderGastrointestinal disorders1/3580/17510/180
HyperlipidaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders16/3586/17510/180
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations16/3589/1755/180
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders1/3580/1759/180

Baseline characteristics

FAS included all randomised participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutideTotal
Mean54.5 ± 10.355.7 ± 10.254.1 ± 10.254.7 ± 10.3
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutideTotal
Female1427972293
Male219100108427
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutideTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000
Not Hispanic or Latino361179180720
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutideTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian361179180720
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American0000
White0000
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c)(Percentage points of HbA1c)Insulin Degludec/LiraglutideInsulin DegludecLiraglutideTotal
Mean8.20 ± 0.838.31 ± 0.848.21 ± 0.778.23 ± 0.82
08

Study locations

36 sites
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Hefei, Anhui 230061, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Beijing, Beijing 100071, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Beijing, Beijing 101200, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    ChongQing, Chongqing 404000, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350001, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Cangzhou, Hebei 061000, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050000, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Changzhou, Jiangsu 213003, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Huai'an, Jiangsu 223002, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Huai'an, Jiangsu 223300, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210011, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Dalian, Liaoning 116011, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Yinchuan, Ningxia 750004, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Jinan, Shandong 250013, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Pudong New District, Shanghai 201200, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200072, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200080, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200123, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200240, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Shanghai, Shanghai 200336, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Tianjin, Tianjin 300052, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Kunming, Yunnan 650101, China
  • Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
    Fuzhou, 350005, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wang W, Agner BFR, Luo B, Liu L, Liu M, Peng Y, Qu S, Stachlewska KA, Wang G, Yuan G, Zhang Q, Ning G. DUAL I China: Improved glycemic control with IDegLira versus its individual components in a randomized trial with Chinese participants with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs. J Diabetes. 2022 Jun;14(6):401-413. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13286. Erratum In: Vox Sang. 2022 Oct;117(10):1242. doi: 10.1111/vox.13360. J Diabetes. 2022 Sep;14(9):635-637. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13307. PubMed 35762390 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 16, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 16, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03172494
Lead sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 1, 2017
Start date
May 26, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 14, 2019
Completion
Jul 13, 2019
Results posted
Jul 7, 2020
Last update
Dec 14, 2022

Study contacts

Global Clinical Registry (GCR,1452)
study director · Novo Nordisk A/S

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion