ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03156387Updated May 17, 2017

Clinical Efficacy of Frenectomies Using Diode Laser Versus Conventional Techniques

An interventional study of Diode laser and Scalpel in High Frenum Attachment, sponsored by T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 51 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-17.

Sponsored by T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2015, registered May 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 51 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of present study was to compare the keratinized gingival tissue measurements, degree of subjective complaints, and functional complications of using an 980 nm diode laser versus a scalpel for frenectomies. Thirty-six patients requiring frenectomies, between 18 and 51 years old, were randomly assigned to either scalpel or diode laser treatments. The soft tissue measurements, including the keratinized gingiva width (KGW), attached gingiva width(AGW), and attached gingiva thickness (AGT), were recorded before surgery, immediately after, one week later, and one, three, and six months after surgery. In addition, the functional complications and the morbidity (level of pain, swelling, and redness) were evaluated during the first postoperative week using a visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS scores indicated that the patients treated with a diode laser had less discomfort and functional complications compare with scalpel surgery.

Read the detailed description

The whole mouth records of each participant served as a basis for the clinical periodontal diagnoses. Prior to the frenectomy, the same investigator recorded the following parameters: plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP). All of the clinical parameters were measured at six sites per tooth (mesio, mid, and distobuccal, and mesio, mid, and distopalatal) using a Williams periodontal probe (Nordent Manufacturing Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL, USA) calibrated in millimeters.

The patients were instructed to record the postoperative degrees of pain, redness, swelling, and functional complications, including chewing and speech, on a 10 cm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS), by placing a vertical mark between the two endpoints, from the first through seventh days. The scale was graded from left to right with values ranging from "0" (no pain, functional complications, discomfort, swelling, or redness) to "10" (worst pain, extreme functional complications, extreme discomfort, extreme swelling, and extreme redness). The keratinized gingiva width (KGW), attached gingiva width (AGW), and attached gingiva thickness (AGT) were also recorded before the surgery. Postoperative analyses were performed at four separate times: immediately, at the first week, and at the first and third months after surgery. The patients in each group were also asked if they required anesthesia during the operation and analgesics after the operation.

02

Conditions studied

  • High Frenum Attachment

Keywords

  • diode laser
  • scalpel surgery
  • frenectomy
  • postoperative complications
03

In context

Postoperative Complications

1,267 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Complications; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 117 across 710 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Complications.

Browse Postoperative Complications studies →

Lead sponsor

T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 51 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Those subjects with maxillary anterior frenula extending to the interdental papilla of the central incisors, those undergoing frenectomies for orthodontic, prosthodontic, or periodontal treatment and those with no surgical contraindications were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patients were excluded if they exhibited poor oral hygiene, received periodontal therapy, were being treated with antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, or analgesics during the previous three months, or if they had any systemic conditions that could affect oral surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diode laser

    A 2.8 W, 980 nm diode laser(Sirona Advanced) in continuous wave mode with an air cooling handpiece was used in the alternative frenectomy technique. The frenulum was held with a hemostat, and a repeated continuous wave mode was applied for the excision. It was also used to remove the periosteal adhesion. The remnants of the ablated tissue were removed with saline, and no sutures were placed after the diode laser treatment.

    Procedure: Diode laser

  • Active comparator
    Scalpel

    (1) topical anesthesia (20% benzocaine), (2) local anesthesia using the bilateral vestibular infiltration technique, with 0.6 ml (1/3 of the carpule contents) of 4% articaine and 1:200,000 epinephrine, (3) hemostatic clamping of the frenulum, (4) excision of the whole band of tissue, together with its alveolar attachment, with a 15C scalpel blade, (5) relaxation and unbending of any fibrous adhesions to the underlying periosteum, and (6) simple suturing with 5-0 silk thread

    Procedure: Scalpel

Interventions

  • ProcedureDiode laser

    2.8 W diode laser surgery were applied on high frenulum attachment and follow-up VAS scores were evaluated

    Also known as: Sirona Advanced

  • ProcedureScalpel

    Scalpel surgery were performed after local anesthetic administration and VAS scores were recorded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative degrees of pain

    visual analog scale (0 to 10 cm)

    Time frame: Change from postoperative first week at postoperative third month

Secondary outcomes

  1. plague index

    between 0 to 4 scale

    Time frame: preoperative

  2. functional complications

    visual analog scale (0 to 10 cm)

    Time frame: Change from postoperative first week at postoperative third month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vescovi P, Corcione L, Meleti M, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Manfredi M, Bonanini M, Govoni P, Rocca JP, Nammour S. Nd:YAG laser versus traditional scalpel. A preliminary histological analysis of specimens from the human oral mucosa. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Sep;25(5):685-91. doi: 10.1007/s10103-010-0770-4. PubMed 20393771 ↗
  • Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Bertrand MF, Merigo E, Nammour S, Vescovi P. Nd:YAG and diode laser in the surgical management of soft tissues related to orthodontic treatment. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Oct;25(5):381-92. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.2068. PubMed 17975951 ↗
  • Romanos G, Nentwig GH. Diode laser (980 nm) in oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures: clinical observations based on clinical applications. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1999 Oct;17(5):193-7. doi: 10.1089/clm.1999.17.193. PubMed 11199822 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The patients will be instructed to record the postoperative degrees of pain, redness, swelling, and functional complications, including chewing and speech, on a 10 cm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS), by placing a vertical mark between the two endpoints, from the first through seventh days.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03156387
Lead sponsor
T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi
Responsible party
Berceste Guler (Clinical Investigator, T.C. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 17, 2017
Start date
Feb 1, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2015
Completion
May 10, 2017
Last update
May 17, 2017

Study contacts

Ahu Uraz, PhD Dr
study director · Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion