CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03144609Updated May 9, 2017

Mechanical Ventilation of Obese Patients During Oral Surgical Procedures

An interventional study of low PEEP and ARM in Obesity, sponsored by Klarić, Vlasta, M.D.. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-09.

Sponsored by Klarić, Vlasta, M.D. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2017), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2015, registered Apr 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The prevalence of obese patients in a great number of patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia has been on the increase. Recent studies suggest an intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for the obese. Surgical procedures in the oral cavity increase the risk of perioperative complications of obese patients. By making this randomized clinical study, investigators want to determine whether the protective intraoperative ventilation with the use of higher positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment maneuvers compared to ventilation with low positive end-expiratory pressure and without recruitments cause better postoperative respiratory function parameters of obese patients during oral surgical procedures. Investigators also aim to establish the fact which value of a positive end-expiratory pressure has a favorable impact on the respiratory function without negative hemodynamic effect.

Read the detailed description

Oral surgeries of obese patients in general endotracheal anesthesia are a special challenge as in the most extensive types of interventions any form of regional anesthesia is inadequate, duration of surgery is short but requires deep level of anesthesia after which a quick awakening and most rapid release from hospital are expected, with a known high perioperative risk complications of obese patients.

Oral surgical procedures in the oral cavity due to possible postoperative upper airway oedema increase the risk of postoperative hypoxia in obese patients. Therefore, it is important to intraoperatively mechanically ventilate obese patients with the aim of good ventilation-perfusion ratio without creating new atelectasis, to minimize the risk of postoperative respiratory decompensation and to provide rapid recovery.

As the prevalence of obesity in the world increases as chronic diseases, the number of obese patients scheduled for oral surgery is growing. Studies involving different ways of intraoperative mechanical ventilation of obese patients are mostly processed laparoscopic abdominal studies that can not exclude the additional effect of intraabdominal pressure on the formation of pulmonary atelectasis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • mechanical ventilation, obesity, oral-surgical procedures
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is close to the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Klarić, Vlasta, M.D. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • body mass index greater than 30 kg / m2
  • surgical operation in the area of the oral cavity in general endotracheal anesthesia - cystectomy, alveotomy, mandible and maxilla osteosynthesis after jaw trauma, operation of retained and affected teeth, orthodontic surgical treatment of jaw deformity, benign tumor surgery
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) Classification of Patients 2-3
  • duration of general endotracheal anesthesia from 1 to 2.5 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to anesthetics
  • previous lung operations
  • documented heart disease (NYHA II, III)
  • Pulmonary disease (asthma, COPD)
  • Obstructive pulmonary function disorders according to spirometry: FVC(forced vital capacity) may and may not be normal, FEV1(forced expiratory volume at one second) \<80%, FEV1 / FVC \<80%)
  • neuromuscular disease
  • clinical sign of cardiovascular disease established during preoperative treatment
  • pregnancy
  • Patients who, for some reason after surgery, have to remain intubated and mechanically ventilated in the Intensive Medicine Unit
  • refuse to sign informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    PEEP 4

    Active Comparator low PEEP: obese patient during oral-surgical procedures under general anesthesia ventilated with Positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) 4 cm H2O(water)

    Procedure: low PEEP

  • Experimental
    PEEP 7 & ARM

    Experimental ARM \& Experimental high PEEP: obese patient during oral-surgical procedures under general anesthesia ventilated with PEEP( positive endexpiratory pressure) 7 cm H2O with ARM(alveolar recruitment maneuver) provided every 30 min

    Procedure: ARM · Procedure: high PEEP

  • Experimental
    PEEP 10 & ARM

    Experimental ARM \& Experimental high PEEP:obese patient during oral-surgical procedures under general anesthesia ventilated with PEEP( positive endexpiratory pressure) 10 cm H2O with ARM(alveolar recruitment maneuver) provided every 30 min

    Procedure: ARM · Procedure: high PEEP

Interventions

  • Procedurelow PEEP

    The control group consisted of obese patients mechanically ventilated by a standardized volume-controlled breathing mode with low respiratory volume without alveolar recruitment maneuver and using low values of PEEP up to 4 cm H2O.

    Also known as: low positive endexpiratory pressure

  • ProcedureARM

    The experimental groups also consisted of obese patients mechanically ventilated by a volume-controlled breathing mode with low respiratory volume 7 ml/kg ideal body mass, but with alveolar recruitment maneuver performed immediately after induction, followed every 30 minutes during the hemodynamic stable condition under operation.

    Also known as: alveolar recruitment maneuver

  • Procedurehigh PEEP

    The experimental groups also consisted of obese patients mechanically ventilated by a volume-controlled breathing mode with low respiratory volume 7 ml/kg ideal body mass, but with higher PEEP, provided that the upper limit of 40 cm H20 was not exceeded.

    Also known as: high positive endexpiratory pressure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. preoperative and postoperative change in arterial blood gas analysis within and between groups of patients

    preoperative blood gas analysis measured an hour before induction and compared with blood gas analysis measured four times in postoperative period, after three different strategies of mechanical ventilation.Blood gas analysis will be compared within a group and between the groups.

    Time frame: Preoperative parameters were compared with change in early postoperative parameter. Early postoperative measurements were measurements after 15 minutes from the operation, then in the first and third hours, and 24 hours after the operation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in preoperative and postoperative degree of dyspnoea measured on Visual Analog Scale

    the degree of dyspnea in the early postoperative period between and within groups and compared with preoperative status. The degree of dyspnoea was determined by the participants on the Visual Analog Scale (0-10). Change From Baseline in dyspnoea Scores on the Visual Analog Scale at 24 hours were measured.

    Time frame: 25 perioperative hours.Preoperative degree was measured one hour before the start of the operation. Early postoperative measurements were measured 15 min after the operation started, then in the first, third and 24th hours after surgery

  2. The connection between the various risks of difficult intubation and obesity.

    morphological characteristics of oral cavity of obese patients,as indicators of the risk of severe intubation, such as interdental spacing in open mouth, type of bite, Mallampati Classification , Cormack-Lehane classification, thyromental and sterno-mental distance and anatomical anomaly of the face . Compare their association with impaired ventilation and / or intubation according to body mass index through study completion

    Time frame: up to 1 day:Visual Scale Cormack- Lehane classification was measured at laryngoscopy for intubation by investigator, all other measurements were measured once at preoperative Anesthetic examination

  3. PEEP effects on MAP

    intraoperative effect of different PEEP values on systemic circulatory stability by measuring systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

    Time frame: 1-2,5 intraoperative hours.Intraoperative measurements were performed 5 min before and 5 min after induction, then every 30 minutes during operation.Change in MAP includes only period from the beginning operation to the end of surgery and extubation.

  4. ARM(alveolar recruitment maneuver) effects on MAP

    intraoperative effect of lung recruitment maneuvers on systemic circulatory stability by measuring systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

    Time frame: 1-2,5 intraoperative hours.Intraoperative measurements were performed 5 min before and 5 min after induction, then every 30 min during operation, and 5 min after ARM is performed. Change in MAP includes period from the beginning to the end of operation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03144609
Lead sponsor
Klarić, Vlasta, M.D.
Responsible party
Klarić, Vlasta, M.D. (Principal Investigator, Klarić, Vlasta, M.D.) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 9, 2017
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Apr 2017
Completion
Aug 2017 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2017

Study contacts

Vlasta Klarić, M.D.
principal investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion