ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03135912Updated Oct 6, 2017

Three-Arm Trial of Novel Treatment for Tinea Pedis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Experimental Drug SESC 01 and Placebo in Tinea Pedis, sponsored by South End Skin Care. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-06.

Sponsored by South End Skin Care · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a three-arm randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of an experimental treatment in the treatment of tinea pedis (athlete's foot). The experimental treatment will be tested against a vehicle control to determine efficacy and safety, and against an active comparator to evaluate the success of the treatment relative to an existing gold-standard treatment. Patients will be treated for four weeks, with their condition being assessed at the end of treatment and two weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint for this study is effective treatment rate at the week 6 evaluation, defined as a mycological cure and minimal clinical signs \& symptoms. Secondary endpoints include safety and patient evaluation of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tinea Pedis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tinea Pedis
  • Athlete's Foot
03

In context

Tinea Pedis

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Tinea Pedis; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is below the median of 128 across 66 interventional studies indexed under Tinea Pedis.

Browse Tinea Pedis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with South End Skin Care as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • male or female, aged 18 or above
  • clinical diagnosis of tinea pedis
  • diagnosis confirmed with potassium hydroxide microscopy
  • availability for the duration of the study (6 weeks)
  • willingness to comply with study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • moccasin-type tinea pedis
  • severe maceration of interdigital spaces
  • severe fissuring
  • history of dry feet, cracking, fissuring
  • concurrent onychomycosis
  • serous exudate or pus
  • topical antifungal treatment in the past 2 weeks
  • systemic antifungal treatment in the past 4 weeks
  • concurrent or antimicrobial therapy
  • liver disease
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • known to any ingredients of trial agents
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Treatment

    Patients supplied with Experimental Drug SESC 01 for daily topical therapy for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Experimental Drug SESC 01

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle Control

    Patients supplied with inactive vehicle (placebo), identical to experimental treatment but without active ingredients, to be applied daily for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator

    Terbinafine hydrochloride cream, to be applied twice daily for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Terbinafine Hydrochloride

Interventions

  • DrugExperimental Drug SESC 01

    Topical experimental treatment comprising a combination of approved topical therapies and a new dosage method.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Dosage method of SESC 01, without active ingredients.

  • Topical terbinafine hydrochloride cream.

    Also known as: Lamisil AT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effective Treatment (Mycological Cure and Minimal Symptoms)

    Binary outcome measure defined as mycological cure AND a total clinical assessment score less than or equal to 2 (out of a possible 18). Mycological cure is defined as negative potassium hydroxide microscopy, while the clinical assessment is based on a sum of 6 symptoms (desquamation, vesiculation, erythema, fissuring, maceration, and pruritus) scored 0-3 by a physician.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Adverse Events

    To examine treatment safety, we will calculate the rate of adverse events and serious adverse and compare them between the study's three arms using Chi-square tests to evaluate whether a statistically significant difference is present.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Effective Treatment (Mycological Cure and Minimal Symptoms)

    Effective treatment as defined above, but measured at the end of treatment (4 weeks after the beginning of participation).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Patient Satisfaction Score

    At the conclusion of treatment, patients complete a brief survey on their impressions of the treatment's tolerability, effectiveness, and convenience on a five-point scale, where 1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent, or they may answer with "No answer/prefer not to say". Scores will be compared for each of the three characteristics and as a sum of the three scores.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Self-Reported Patient Compliance

    On the same experience questionnaire, patients are asked to estimate how many doses of treatment they missed or forgot to take. Possible answers are None, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, or 9 or more. This indicates whether there is a significant difference in patients' likelihood to adhere to a treatment regimen.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kuchnir Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgery
    Milford, Massachusetts 01757, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2017, 6 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 20, 2016
First posted
May 2, 2017
StartActual
Jan 3, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 2, 2017
CompletionActual
Aug 2, 2017
Last update
Oct 6, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03135912
Lead sponsor
South End Skin Care
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 2, 2017
Start date
Jan 3, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 2, 2017
Completion
Aug 2, 2017
Last update
Oct 6, 2017

Study contacts

Carl Schanbacher, MD
principal investigator · South End Skin Care

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion