CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03129191Updated Nov 8, 2017

Audiological Benefit With Non-implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Systems

An interventional study of Non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid A and Non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid B in Hearing Loss, Conductive, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-08.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Recently, a new non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid was introduced. The system is connected directly to the skin with an adhesive adapter to transmit the sound to the inner ear through bone vibrations. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the audiological benefit of the new bone conduction hearing aid and compare it to an existing bone conduction hearing aid in normal hearing adults with bilateral simulated conductive hearing loss.

An evaluation of the improvement on speech understanding in noise and sound localization allows to estimate the system performance and enables to derive recommendations for clinical usage of the novel hearing system. It is hypothesized that in the bilateral condition similar speech understanding in noise and sound localization performance can be achieved with the new system compared to existing bone conduction hearing aids that are pressed against the skull using a soft band.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss, Conductive
03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 724 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Written informed consent
  • Adults (age ≥ 18 years on the test date)
  • Normal hearing thresholds (AC/BC-thresholds ≤ 20 dB HL, 0.25 to 8 kHz)
  • German native speakers
  • Willingness and ability to perform all tests required for the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of compliance with any inclusion criteria
  • Allergy against silicon (ear mold casting mass)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    AB arm

    Sequence: 1. Aided with non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid A 2. Aided with non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid B

    Device: Non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid A · Device: Non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid B

  • Active comparator
    BA arm

    Sequence: 1. Aided with non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid B 2. Aided with non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid A

    Device: Non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid A · Device: Non-invasive bone conduction hearing aid B

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-invasive bone conduction hearing aid A

    The intervention is a non-invasive bone conduction hearing device which is retained on the patient's head with an elastic headband.

  • DeviceNon-invasive bone conduction hearing aid B

    The intervention is a non-invasive bone conduction hearing device which is retained on the patient's head with an adhesive adapter that is placed behind the auricle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Speech reception threshold in noise (S0NDIFF)

    Speech reception threshold in noise (in dB SNR) measured with speech presented from the front (0° azimuth) and approximated diffuse noise presented from 4 speakers.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Speech reception threshold in noise (S90NDIFF)

    Speech reception threshold in noise (in dB SNR) measured with speech presented from the right side (90° azimuth) and approximated diffuse noise presented from 4 speakers.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Speech reception threshold in noise (S270NDIFF)

    Speech reception threshold in noise (in dB SNR) measured with speech presented from the left side (270° azimuth) and approximated diffuse noise presented from 4 speakers.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Sound localization

    Mean absolute localization error (in degrees)

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Subjective evaluation of the sound quality

    Assessment of the sound quality with questionnaire by Gabrielsson et al.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hearing Research Laboratory, University Hospital Bern
    Bern, 3008, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03129191
Lead sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 26, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 6, 2017
Completion
Nov 6, 2017
Last update
Nov 8, 2017

Study contacts

Martin Kompis, Prof
principal investigator · University Hospital Bern, Inselsptial

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion