CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03119805ReFlaPUpdated Oct 17, 2018

Remission and Flare in Psoriatic Arthritis: a Prospective 6-month Study With a Double Perspective.

An observational study in Psoriatic Arthritis, sponsored by Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere. Completed at 22 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-17.

Sponsored by Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
466
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to define cut-off values of the most widely used composite scores and patient-reported outcomes, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA, when remission/low disease activity and flare are defined from the patient and physician perspective. The ReFlaP (Remission/Flare in PsA) study is a prospective, multicentric international, longitudinal, observational study.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous chronic disease with a significant patient-perceived impact leading to pain, fatigue, impaired function and quality of life and psychological distress. Remission is the announced treatment target in PsA. Several definitions of remission have been proposed including definitions on composite scores such as the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Minimal Disease Activity (MDA), however their translation into the patient's perspective is lacking. Flares are frequent in PsA and are important for patients but are not well-defined from the physician's perspective. Although some work is ongoing regarding remission and flare from the patient's perspective, currently no information allows to cross-tabulate and compare the patient and physician perspectives regarding remission and flare in PsA .

The objective is to define cutoffs of the most widely used composite scores and PROs, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA, when remission/low disease activity and flare are defined from the patient and physician perspective.

Methods Design: the ReFlaP (Remission/Flare in PsA) study is a prospective, multicentric international, longitudinal, observational study. It will take place in 2017-18 in 25 centers across Europe, North and South America and Asia. Investigators plan to include a total of 450 patients. The inclusion period will last 6 months; each center will include around 20 patients. Each patient is seen twice at baseline and at 1-6 months (follow-up visit) in the context of usual care.

Patients: Consecutive adult patients with definite PsA (according to ClASsification of Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and confirmation by a rheumatologist), more than 2 years of disease duration, and will be included after signed informed consent.

Data collection: During each visit, physicians will collect data on the disease and on disease activity: 66 swollen joint counts, 68 tender joint counts, tender entheseal points (Leeds Enthesitis Index) and body surface area of psoriasis. This will allow calculation of most of the usual composite scores of PsA: Arythmetic Mean of Desirability Functions modified (AMDF modified), Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), clinical DAPSA (c-DAPSA), Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS). Well-validated Patient Reported Outcomes will be collected from patients: Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Pain, Health Assessment Quality (HAQ), PSoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PSAID), Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life (PsAQoL), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) as well as the recent Flare questionnaire proposed by GRAPPA. Assessment of disease activity status (i.e. remission or flare) will be performed by both physician and patient using global questions.

Planned analysis

To define cutoffs of the most widely used composite scores and PROs, for levels corresponding to remission/low disease activity and for changes in levels corresponding to flares, in PsA:

From the health professional perspective, the gold standard for 'remission' will be MDA and sensitivity analyses will use physician-perceived remission/low disease activity (single questions) and remission in composite scores (DAPSA, c-DAPSA, modified AMDF, PASDAS); for flare the gold standard will be decision of treatment intensification and sensitivity analyses will use: global assessment of flare and increase in category of disease activity in the composite scores.

From the perspective of the patient, the gold standard will be for 'remission', PASS and as sensitivity analysis, patient-perceived remission/low disease single questions yes/no, and for flares, the GRAPPA flare questionnaire, and as sensitivity analyses, flare according to the patient (single question) and the assessment of worsening in MCID.

Investigators will assess what physician-defined remission/low disease activity/flare and patient-defined remission/low disease activity/flare correspond to both on composite 'physician' scores and on all the collected PRO scores. Investigators will use data collected at baseline cross sectionally for remission/low disease activity and changes in scores between the 2 visits for flares.

Cutoff values for each outcome and for each change in outcome will be calculated using ROC curves and 75th percentile analyses. Sensitivity analyses will explore cutoff values found according to patient demographic characteristics and country. Investigators will compare attainment of remission or flare according to the different definitions, using kappa analyses. Rasch analyses will be used as necessary.

Planned outcomes The expected outcomes of this study are a better knowledge of remission/low disease activity and flare in PsA in accordance to the perspectives of patients and physicians. Investigators will define cutoff values for most widely-used scores in PsA, allowing easier interpretation of study results and in the clinic, helping a better communication with patients.

Better knowledge of the important aspects of disease fluctuation and of patient relevant disease targets in PsA should enhance patient care and management in a treat-to-target approach.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

  • composite scores
  • patient reported outcomes
  • patient perpective
  • physician perspective
  • cut-off values
  • flare
  • remission
  • minimal disease activity
  • low disease activity
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 466 is above the median of 155 across 1,057 observational studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Over the 6 months recruitment period, all patients with definite PsA who satisfy the inclusion criteria, seen in outpatient visits in the participating centers by one of the investigators, will be asked to participate. It is planned to take place in 6 participating centres in France, 15 other European tertiary rheumatology centers (Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Romania, Spain, Turkey and the UK), 4 centers in the USA, 2 centers in Canada, 1 in Brazil, and 2 in Asia (Singapore and Russia).It is planned that in each center, 15-30 patients will be included. The first 15-30 consecutive patients will be selected in each center to reduce bias selection.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age>18 years
  • Definite PsA according to the ClASsification of Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and diagnosis confirmed by a rheumatologist. (Taylor2006)
  • Willingness to participate and signed informed consent.
  • There are no inclusion criteria based on disease activity or treatment
  • Patients with more than 2 years of disease duration will be included in the study for more homogeneity.

Patient will be included consecutively. A registry will be kept locally to note the age and gender of patients who have been proposed the study but refused to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No definite PsA or less than 2 years of disease duration
  • Patients who don't speak or read the local language or are not comfortable filling in a paper CRF in the local language.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
466 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the cutoff value of PsAID corresponding to flare

    For flare, the gold standard will be decision of treatment intensification. The primary outcome will be to determine the cutoff value of PsAID corresponding flare. The PsAID is a questionnaire (paper CRF) that can be used to calculate a score reflecting the impact of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the patients' perspective. (Gossec L et al., A patient-derived and patient-reported outcome measure for assessing psoriatic arthritis: elaboration and preliminary validation of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire, a 13-country EULAR initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):1012-9).

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. To determine the cutoff value of PsAID corresponding to remission

    For remission, the gold standard will be Minimal Disease Activity. The primary outcome will be to determine the cutoff value of PsAID corresponding to remission. Patients are classified as achieving Minimal Disease Activity if they fulfill 5 of 7 outcome measures: tender joint count ≤1; swollen joint count ≤1; psoriasis activity and severity index ≤1 or body surface area ≤3; patient pain visual analog scale (VAS) score of ≤15; patient global disease activity VAS score of ≤20; Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score ≤0.5; and tender entheseal points ≤1. (L C Coates, J Fransen, P S Helliwell Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment Clinical and epidemiological research Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:48-53.)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

22 sites
  • Ana- Maria Orbai
    Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States
  • Husni
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Smolen
    Vienna, Austria
  • Palominos
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • Aydin
    Ottawa, Canada
  • Sibel Aydin
    Ottawa, Canada
  • Eder
    Toronto, Canada
  • Talli
    Tallinn, Estonia
  • Soubrier
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
  • Dernis
    Le Mans, France
  • Laure Gossec
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Richette
    Paris, France
  • Ruyssen-Witrand
    Toulouse, France
  • Uta Kiltz
    Herne, Germany
  • Lubrano
    Campobasso, Italy
  • Rossana Scrivo
    Roma, Italy
  • Balanescu
    Bucarest, Romania
  • Inna Gaydukova
    Saratov, Russian Federation
  • Katy Leung
    Singapour, Singapore
  • Juan Canete
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Kalyoncu
    Ankara, Turkey
  • Laura Coates
    Oxford, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lucasson F, Kiltz U, Kalyoncu U, Leung YY, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Meisalu S, Ryussen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Aydin SZ, Eder L, Gaydukova I, Lubrano E, Richette P, Husni E, Coates LC, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Orbai AM, Gossec L. Disparities in healthcare in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 439 patients from 13 countries. RMD Open. 2022 May;8(1):e002031. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002031. Erratum In: RMD Open. 2022 May;8(1):e002031corr1. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002031corr1. PubMed 35523519 ↗
  • Coates LC, Robinson DE, Orbai AM, Kiltz U, Leung YY, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Meisalu S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Eder L, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Lubrano E, Gossec L. What influences patients' opinion of remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis? Principal component analysis of an international study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Nov 3;60(11):5292-5299. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab220. PubMed 33751029 ↗
  • Orbai AM, Perin J, Gorlier C, Coates LC, Kiltz U, Leung YY, Palominos PE, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Talli S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Aydin S, Eder L, Gaydukova I, Lubrano E, Kalyoncu U, Richette P, Husni ME, Smolen JS, de Wit M, Gossec L. Determinants of Patient-Reported Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease: An Analysis of the Association With Sex in 458 Patients From Fourteen Countries. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Dec;72(12):1772-1779. doi: 10.1002/acr.24090. PubMed 31609525 ↗
  • Gorlier C, Orbai AM, Puyraimond-Zemmour D, Coates LC, Kiltz U, Leung YY, Palominos P, Canete JD, Scrivo R, Balanescu A, Dernis E, Talli S, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Soubrier M, Aydin SZ, Eder L, Gaydukova I, Lubrano E, Kalyoncu U, Richette P, Husni ME, de Wit M, Smolen JS, Gossec L. Comparing patient-perceived and physician-perceived remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 410 patients from 14 countries. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):201-208. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214140. Epub 2018 Nov 15. PubMed 30442648 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 21, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03119805
Lead sponsor
Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
Responsible party
Laure Gossec (Professor, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2017
Start date
May 18, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2018
Completion
Jul 30, 2018
Last update
Oct 17, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion