CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03108157Updated Jun 23, 2020Results posted

Endometrial Scratch Effect on Pregnancy Rates in Patients Undergoing Egg-donation IVF

An interventional study of Endometrial scratch in EMBRYO IMPLANTATION, sponsored by Procreatec. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-23.

Sponsored by Procreatec · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
352
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Clinical trial about the effect of endometrial scratch on pregnancy rates in patients undergoing a treatment with in-vitro fertilization with donor eggs, when doing the endometrial biopsy during the cycle prior to the embryo transfer.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate whether an endometrial scratch during the cycle prior to embryo transfer cycle is effective or not in increasing pregnancy rates. Previous studies about this issue have not shown clear conclusions about the effectiveness of this method.

The endometrial scratch is a simple technique that consists in performing a mild injury to all the internal walls of the uterus with a Pipelle Cournier.

To achieve the trial objective, all participating patients are randomly divided into two groups. Once patients decide to participate in the trial, they are assigned to each group according to the randomization list:

Group A: Patients with transfer of fresh embryos after taking an endometrium biopsy during the previous cycle and then following the conventional preparation protocol.

Group B: Patients with transfer of fresh embryos with the conventional preparation protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • EMBRYO IMPLANTATION

Keywords

  • IVF
  • DONOR EGGS
  • ENDOMETRIAL SCRATCH
  • PIPELLE
  • ONGOING PREGNANCY
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Procreatec is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Female undergoing IVF treatment with donor eggs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe male factor ( less tan 2 million spermatozoa per ml )
  • Uterine abnormalities
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
352 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    GROUP A: intervention group

    Patients will be performed an endometrial scratch with Pipelle Cournier 3 to 4 weeks before the embryo transfer and then they will follow the conventional preparation protocol to receive embryos coming from an egg donation treatment.

    Procedure: Endometrial scratch

  • No intervention
    GROUP B: no intervention group

    Patients will receive the conventional preparation protocol to receive embryos coming from an egg donation treatment.

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndometrial scratch

    Patients included in the study group will be performed an endometrial scratch with Pipelle Cournier 3 to 4 weeks before embryo transfer.

    Also known as: Scratching

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Positive Pregnancy Test

    Positive test (hcG\>10 UI/ml)

    Time frame: 12 to 14 days after embryo transfer

  2. Clinical Pregnancy

    Ultrasound confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy

    Time frame: 5 weeks of pregnancy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Live Birth

    Birth after 24 weeks of pregnancy

    Time frame: Pregnancy beyond 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 4, 2019

Participant flow

Recruitment started on January 2017 and finished in October 2018. All patients were recruited at ProcreaTec Fertility Clinic in Madrid

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: no Intervention Group
Started176176
Completed161172
Not completed154
Withdrew: Protocol violation154

Outcome measures

PrimaryPositive Pregnancy Test

Positive test (hcG\>10 UI/ml)

Time frame:
12 to 14 days after embryo transfer
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Positive Pregnancy Test
ParticipantsGROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: no Intervention Group
Positive Pregnancy Test112113
PrimaryClinical Pregnancy

Ultrasound confirmation of intrauterine pregnancy

Time frame:
5 weeks of pregnancy
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Pregnancy
ParticipantsGROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: no Intervention Group
Clinical Pregnancy104102
SecondaryLive Birth

Birth after 24 weeks of pregnancy

Time frame:
Pregnancy beyond 24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Live Birth
ParticipantsGROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: no Intervention Group
Live Birth9285

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse effects will be controlled for every patient for 12 months, starting on the day of randomization.. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GROUP A: Intervention Group0/161 (0%)0/161 (0%)36/161 (22.4%)
GROUP B: no Intervention Group0/172 (0%)0/172 (0%)47/172 (27.3%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventGROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: no Intervention Group
Preterm deliveryPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions12/16116/172
MiscarriagePregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions12/16112/172
Pre-eclampsiaPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions4/1616/172
Vanishing twinPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions3/1613/172
Ectopic pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1613/172
Gestational diabetesPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions2/1611/172
2nd twin stillbirthPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1612/172
Placentation abnormalitiesPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/1610/172
Preterm delivery threatPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/1610/172
Gestational cholestasisPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions1/1611/172

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: Non Intervention GroupTotal
Mean41.29 ± 4.2741.50 ± 4.6741.3 ± 4.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: Non Intervention GroupTotal
Female176176352
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: Non Intervention GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian145
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American41014
White152142294
More than one race192039
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)GROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: Non Intervention GroupTotal
Spain176176352
Smokers
Smokers(Participants)GROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: Non Intervention GroupTotal
Count of participants342963
BMI
BMI(kg/m2)GROUP A: Intervention GroupGROUP B: Non Intervention GroupTotal
Mean22.78 ± 3.3922.92 ± 3.3122.8 ± 3.3
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Procreatec
    Madrid, 28036, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dain L, Ojha K, Bider D, Levron J, Zinchenko V, Walster S, Dirnfeld M. Effect of local endometrial injury on pregnancy outcomes in ovum donation cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):1048-54. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.044. Epub 2014 Jul 23. PubMed 25064410 ↗
  • Potdar N, Gelbaya T, Nardo LG. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Dec;25(6):561-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Sep 12. PubMed 23063812 ↗
  • Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 22;(3):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub3. PubMed 25803542 ↗
  • Gibreel A, El-Adawi N, Elgindy E, Al-Inany H, Allakany N, Tournaye H. Endometrial scratching for women with previous IVF failure undergoing IVF treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015 Apr;31(4):313-6. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.994603. Epub 2015 Jan 5. PubMed 25561347 ↗
  • Ko JK, Ng EH. Scratching and IVF: any role? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;28(3):178-83. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000264. PubMed 26950730 ↗
  • Singh N, Toshyan V, Kumar S, Vanamail P, Madhu M. Does endometrial injury enhances implantation in recurrent in-vitro fertilization failures? A prospective randomized control study from tertiary care center. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015 Oct-Dec;8(4):218-23. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.170401. PubMed 26752857 ↗
  • Wise J. Endometrial scratching improves IVF pregnancy rate. BMJ. 2013 Oct 4;347:f6007. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6007. No abstract available. PubMed 24100512 ↗
  • Yang R, Yang S, Li R, Chen X, Wang H, Ma C, Liu P, Qiao J. Biochemical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in first IVF cycles are negative predictors for subsequent cycles: an over 10,000 cases cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;292(2):453-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3639-8. Epub 2015 Feb 8. PubMed 25663163 ↗
  • Ueno J, Salgado RM, Tomioka RB, Colucci JA, Schor E, Carvalho FM. Clinical relevance of diagnostic hysteroscopy with concurrent endometrial biopsy in the accurate assessment of intrauterine alterations. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;292(2):363-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3634-0. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PubMed 25644507 ↗
  • Timeva T, Shterev A, Kyurkchiev S. Recurrent implantation failure: the role of the endometrium. J Reprod Infertil. 2014 Oct;15(4):173-83. PubMed 25473625 ↗
  • Gnainsky Y, Granot I, Aldo P, Barash A, Or Y, Mor G, Dekel N. Biopsy-induced inflammatory conditions improve endometrial receptivity: the mechanism of action. Reproduction. 2015 Jan;149(1):75-85. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0395. Epub 2014 Oct 27. PubMed 25349438 ↗
  • Lensen S, Martins W, Nastri C, Sadler L, Farquhar C. Pipelle for Pregnancy (PIP): study protocols for three randomised controlled trials. Trials. 2016 Apr 27;17(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1301-9. PubMed 27121007 ↗
  • Lensen S, Sadler L, Farquhar C. Endometrial scratching for subfertility: everyone's doing it. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jun;31(6):1241-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew053. Epub 2016 Mar 22. PubMed 27008891 ↗
  • Karimzadeh MA, Ayazi Rozbahani M, Tabibnejad N. Endometrial local injury improves the pregnancy rate among recurrent implantation failure patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomised clinical trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49(6):677-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01076.x. PubMed 20070722 ↗
  • Nastri CO, Polanski LT, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Endometrial scratching for women with repeated implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2855-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu257. Epub 2014 Oct 14. No abstract available. PubMed 25316455 ↗
  • Panagiotopoulou N, Karavolos S, Choudhary M. Endometrial injury prior to assisted reproductive techniques for recurrent implantation failure: a systematic literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jul 17. PubMed 26218557 ↗
  • Kitaya K, Matsubayashi H, Takaya Y, Nishiyama R, Yamaguchi K, Ishikawa T. Clinical background affecting pregnancy outcome following local endometrial injury in infertile patients with repeated implantation failure. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016 Jul;32(7):587-90. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2016.1144742. Epub 2016 Feb 18. PubMed 26890618 ↗
  • Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Endometrial scratching performed in the non-transfer cycle and outcome of assisted reproduction: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;42(4):375-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.12539. Epub 2013 Sep 2. PubMed 23754314 ↗
  • Izquierdo A, de la Fuente L, Spies K, Rayward J, Lopez L, Lora D, Galindo A. Endometrial scratch vs no intervention in egg donation cycles: the ENDOSCRATCH trial protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 30;20(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02958-0. PubMed 32473654 ↗
  • Izquierdo Rodriguez A, de la Fuente Bitaine L, Spies K, Lora D, Galindo A. Endometrial Scratching Effect on Clinical Pregnancy Rates in Patients Undergoing Egg Donor In Vitro Fertilization Cycles: the ENDOSCRATCH Randomized Clinical Trial (NCT03108157). Reprod Sci. 2020 Oct;27(10):1863-1872. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00204-8. Epub 2020 May 28. PubMed 32468267 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 25, 2019
  • Study protocol · Jan 12, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03108157
Lead sponsor
Procreatec
Collaborators
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Responsible party
ALEXANDRA IZQUIERDO RODRIGUEZ (MD, Procreatec) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 11, 2017
Start date
Jan 12, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2018
Completion
Dec 31, 2019
Results posted
Dec 4, 2019
Last update
Jun 23, 2020

Study contacts

Alberto Galindo, PhD
study director · Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre
Laura De la Fuente, PhD
study chair · Hospital Universitario 12 Octubre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion