ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03095430ESPTRUpdated Mar 29, 2017

Modulation of General Anesthesia Using Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index

An observational study in Trauma and General Anaesthetic Drug Overdose, sponsored by Romanian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-29.

Sponsored by Romanian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The critically ill polytrauma patient is one of the most complex cases with regard to the optimization of the intensive care, anesthesia, as well as postoperative management. One of the most important steps in the complex management of such patients is the modulation of anesthesia and the volemic resuscitation, especially in the first hours post-trauma, and in the operating room admission. We start with the assumptions that the optimization of anesthesia should depend on each patient, being conducted in an individual manner. We also believe that by individualizing the anesthesia by monitoring the entropy and SPI it is possible to obtain an appropriate management regarding resuscitation and volume replacement. Furthermore it assumes that an adequate anesthesia, and resuscitation singled volume replacement can reduce morbidity and mortality rates as well as the period of stay in the ICU and recovery time.

Read the detailed description

Objectives

The project aims to aid to the Romanian healthcare system, by assuring new modernized monitoring equipment, specific for the department of anaesthesia and intensive care, for both clinical and paraclinical data, as well as for the existing information for modulation and optimizing of the general anaesthesia used in critically ill polytrauma cases based on modern techniques, such as entropy, and surgical pleth index (SPI). In this way, it aims to create a new prospect of developing a model, which will help the physicians in the decision-making process, hoping to improve the stats in the high morbidity and mortality rates in this specific field of medicine.

Reducing the mortality and increasing the quality of the provided medical services is possible by assuring a modern monitoring system, because critically ill patients should be observed through complex techniques. Furthermore, interpretation and timely synthesis of the biological signals and their correlation with other clinical and laboratory data are useful in modulating general anesthesia in the critically conditions.

General objectives comprise of developing a new research field regarding the international standards of research and combating the economic and social needs of Romania and Europe, by creating a complete protocol, which is innovative and helpful in improving the mortality and morbidity index for polytrauma patients admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU), by means of better monitoring procedures and modulating the anaesthesia and therapeutic management, therefore increasing the efficiency of the public health care system.

The specific objectives of the study are to represent the integration of modern anesthesia methods used for monitoring and optimizing the management of anesthesia and therapy options, depending on each patient as an individual; calculating the severity scores and risk factors, both in the first 24 hours as well as continuously, providing support instruments designed to add to the medical decision making process, and make it possible in a very short time, developing an ergonomic mode, dynamic and standardized viewing of local and distant perioperative anesthetic protocols, modulated by non-invasive modern techniques for anaesthesia monitoring.

Measurements:

All the patients enrolled in the study will have a monitoring sheet from the start, which will contain details regarding the following: a) Demographic data: age, sex, BMI (registered at the time of admission); b) Clinical data: ASA score, ISS score, APACHE II score, trauma mechanism, type of surgical intervention (registered at the time of admission); c) Laboratory data: EAB parameters, complete blood count, fibrinogen, ESR, PCR, total bilirubin (T0 - before orotracheal intubation, T1 - at extubating, T2 - at 24 hours post-operatively, T0 - before orotracheal intubation, T2 - at 24 hours post-operatively; d) Clinical parameters: heart rate, mean blood pressure, SpO2 plethysmography, EtCO2 capnography, entropy, SPI, axillary skin temperature probe, diuresis (T0 - before orotracheal intubation, at an interval of 15 minutes perioperative, T1 - at extubating); e) Perioperative events: hypotension, bradycardia, bronchospams, SpO2 drop (desaturation) lower than 90% via pulse oximetry (Every event should be noted in the monitoring sheet of the study); f) Events related to intubation: laryngospasms, failed intubation, tissue injury resulting from difficult intubating conditions, postoperative airway complications due to difficult intubation (Every event should be noted in the monitoring sheet of the study). The database officer should register all the patient data relevant for the study in electronic format including all details noted in the monitoring sheet.

Statistical Analysis:

For statistically analysis of the study, in concordance to these objectives, a series of statistical tests were utilized which can satisfy all the statistical objectives of the study. For analysis if the normal distributions of continuous data, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be utilized. Similarly, data with a normal distribution were compared using the Student t test and presented as mean with SD. Last but not the least, data with an inhomogeneous distribution will be compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and presented as median. Nominal data will be compared using the chi-square test. For highlighting the statistical differences, a P value less than 0.05 was considered as significant. The statistical analysis of data will be performed computerized with the programs Microsoft Office Excel for Mac 2011 v.14.4.7. (Microsoft Corporation, Bucharest, Romania) and Prism 6 for Mac OS X v.6.0. (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). This analysis consisted, in the calculation of frequencies and the percentages for qualitative variables, as well as the calculation of the arithmetic means and the standard deviations for quantitative variables. The statistical estimation of the results was performed using the criteria decision of the statistical test. Similarly, the lot will be further statistically analyzed for determining the heterogeneity/homogeneity in between the groups. Similarly, for increasing in the transparency between the different groups, patients will be divided into more groups, as presented in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Trauma
  • General Anaesthetic Drug Overdose

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Trauma
  • General Anesthesia
  • Surgical Pleth Index
  • Entropy
03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

2,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 441 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is below the median of 169 across 690 observational studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Romanian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Polytrauma patients admitted in OR

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age limit: between 18 years to 80 years;
  • gender: male and female;
  • within 2 hours of surgical intervention;
  • I, II, III;
  • written consent accepted to be enrolled in the study; in polytrauma patients in the operation theatre who are brought directly through the emergency department, written consent is obtained from the relatives, in accordance to the national law number 206, of 2004, for a good and correct scientific research, in the situation where the patient is no capable to sign or give the written consent;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cardiac pacemaker;
  • atrial fibrillation at the time of presentation in the operation theatre;
  • any subject with epidural catheter, placed pre-operatively;
  • allergy to Propofol or another anesthetic drugs;
  • pregnancy;
  • presence of neuromuscular disease;
  • presence of neurologic disease;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ESPI Group

    General Anesthesia using Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index Monitoring

    Device: Monitoring

  • Control Group

    General Anesthesia without Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index (Control Group)

Interventions

  • DeviceMonitoring

    Monitoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of systolic blood pressure baseline

    Evaluating the impact of general anesthesia guided with Entropy and SPI on the hemodynamic instability in the critically ill polytrauma patient; hemodynamic instability is represented and characterized by high blood pressure episodes (hypertension), or low blood pressure (hypotension).

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure at 1 hour

  2. Change of heart beat rate baseline

    Evaluating the impact of general anesthesia guided with Entropy and SPI on the heart rate in the critically ill polytrauma patient; cardiac rate instability is represented and characterized by high cardiac rate (tachycardia), or low cardiac rate (bradycardia)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline heart beat rate at 1 hour

  3. Opioid consumption

    Evaluating the opioid consumption by general anesthesia-guided with Entropy and SPI

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rogobete AF, Sandesc D, Cradigati CA, Sarandan M, Papurica M, Popovici SE, Vernic C, Bedreag OH. Implications of Entropy and Surgical Pleth Index-guided general anaesthesia on clinical outcomes in critically ill polytrauma patients. A prospective observational non-randomized single centre study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 Aug;32(4):771-778. doi: 10.1007/s10877-017-0059-2. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PubMed 28856631 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Dec 2016, 11 months.

Of 265 non-industry observational studies under Wounds and Injuries, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60. This study's 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 312 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60.

Wounds and Injuries covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 7, 2017
First posted
Mar 29, 2017
StartActual
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2016
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2017
Last update
Mar 29, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03095430
Lead sponsor
Romanian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Collaborators
University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara
Responsible party
Alexandru Florin Rogobete (Principal Investigator, Romanian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2016
Completion
Feb 1, 2017
Last update
Mar 29, 2017

Study contacts

Alexandru Rogobete, MSc, PhDs, Clin Res
principal investigator · Romanian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Ovidiu Horea Bedreag, MD, PhD, Asssit Prof
study director · Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara
Dorel Sandesc, MD, PhD, Prof
study chair · Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion