CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03094936Updated Mar 29, 2017

Clinical Trial for Weight Regain Post-RYGB: APC Versus APC Plus Endoscopic Suture Technique

An interventional study of APC and Endoscopic Suture Technique (OverStitch TM) in Obesity, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-29.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obesity is a worldwide health and sociopolitical problem. Excessive body-weight currently affects over 50% of the Brazilian population. It has been well established that obesity is an independent health risk. Obese individuals are at increased to extremely high risk for many diseases and for early death relative to those with normal weights and waist circumferences. The increased disease susceptibility for this subset of patients includes hypertension, stroke, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, Type 2 diabetes, neoplasms, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease, and musculoskeletal disorders.

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity. As bariatrics grow, the number of patients suffering from surgical-related complications also grows. One of the most worrisome long-term complications is weight regain, once the patient may be again affected by overweight-related comorbidities and face again pre-operative esthetic issues.

This trial focus on testing efficacy and safety of two endoscopic revisional procedures in patients suffering from weight regain following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Ablation with Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) versus APC plus Endoscopic Full-thickness Suture (with Apollo Overstitch device). Pouch volume, gastric emptying and gut hormones changes will also be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Obesity is a worldwide health and sociopolitical issue. Excessive body-weight currently affects over 50% of the Brazilian population and around 13% of all world population. It has been well established that obesity is an independent risk factor. Obese individuals are at increased risk of diseases and earlier death compared to those with normal weight and waist circumferences. The increased disease susceptibility of this subset of patients includes hypertension, stroke, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, Type 2 diabetes, neoplasms, GERD, and musculoskeletal disorders.

Obese patients and their physicians have increasingly turned to surgery to solve the excess weight issue and the frequent co-morbid conditions that impact their health and quality of life. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Laparoscopic Gastric Banding (LGB) comprise around 70% of all weight loss procedures performed every year. They induce significant and perennial weight loss and reduce or eliminate associated co-morbid diseases, including Type 2 diabetes. Despite improvements in postoperative morbidity and mortality rates over the years, (in part due to the use of a laparoscopic approach), these procedures still carry significant risk. Recent studies have shown mortality rates with RYGB as high as 1.9%, and complications associated with LGB as high as 13%. Nonetheless, a secondary bariatric procedure due to weight regain carries significant complication rates and worse outcomes, compared to the primary procedure. Consequently, less invasive techniques are needed to reduce such risks.

Gastric restriction is an important principle of both RYGB and LGB. The OverStitchTM Endoscopic Suturing System (Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. Austin, Texas) is an approved device designed to endoscopic placement of suture(s) and approximation of soft tissue. This system offers the assistant doctor the ability to restrict gastric pouch size by approximating tissue endoluminally through an incisionless (per-oral) approach. The use of this system has the potential to reduce the complications associated with the current surgical approach but still reaching the desired gastric restriction. The OverStitch has safely been used clinically for a great number of procedures that demanded an incisionless or minimally invasive approach, including endoluminal revisions for post-bypass gastric stoma and/or pouch dilatation, post-bypass fistulae repair, and oversewing of marginal ulcers.

Besides this suturing device, other endoscopic methods have already been used to reduce dilated stoma. Among them, ablation with argon plasma coagulation (APC) is one of the most important since this device is worldly available and presents an acceptable cost. Recent studies associate APC prior to endoscopic suture and initial evidence supports superiority of this association.

However, literature is still lacking of studies to support the use of APC associated with endoscopic suturing instead of APC alone. Therefore, the main focus of this study is to directly compare short and long-term effectiveness and safety of APC versus APC plus Endoscopic Full-thickness suture with OverStitch device in patients suffering from weight regain following RYGB.

Moreover, gut hormones regulation regarding bariatric and revisional procedures have been studied recently and evidence suggests that hormonal changes may be an important factor in weight loss. Three of the most important gut hormones regarding weight balance are ghrelin, GLP1 and peptide YY. Ghrelin is known as hunger hormone. It is produced by cells in gastric fundus. Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP1) and Peptide YY (PYY) are both hormones that regulate satiety and are produced by L cells along distal intestine. Evidence in bariatric show that after long-term ghrelin levels diminish while GLP and PYY reach higher post-prandial peak. Regarding revisional endoscopic therapy, gut hormone changes have never been studied. That is also focus of this study as secondary outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 595 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subject has stoma dilation defined as greater than 12mm, assessed with an esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed pre-operatively
  2. Subject is ≥ 18 yrs. of age and ≤ 60 yrs. of age
  3. Subject has a BMI of > 30
  4. Subject has history of obesity for > 2 yrs
  5. Subject has had no significant weight change (\<5% of total body weight) in last 6 months
  6. Subject must have failed standard obesity therapy (diet, exercise, behavior modification, and pharmacologic agents either alone or in combination), which will be assessed through an interview performed by a team member of the study at baseline
  7. Subject is a reasonable candidate for general anesthesia
  8. Subject agrees not to have any additional weight loss surgery or reconstructive surgery that may affect body weight (i.e. mammoplasty, liposuction, lipoplasty, etc) during the trial
  9. Subject must be willing and able to participate in all aspects of the study and agree to comply with all study requirements for the duration of the study. This includes availability of reliable transportation and sufficient time to attend all follow-up visits.
  10. Subject must be able to fully understand and be willing to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has had significant weight loss in the last 3 months, or between baseline and the study procedure
  2. Mallampati (intubation) score greater than 3
  3. Subject is observed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy to have heavily scarred, malignant or poor quality/friable tissue in areas of the stomach where sutures are to be placed
  4. Subject has history of inflammatory disease of GI tract
  5. Subject has a history of intestinal strictures or adhesions
  6. Subject has renal and/or hepatic insufficiency
  7. Subject has chronic pancreatic disease
  8. Subject has history of/or signs and/or symptoms of gastro-duodenal ulcer disease and/or active peptic ulcer
  9. Subject has significant esophageal disease including Zenker's diverticulum, grade 3-4 reflux esophagitis, stricture, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal cancer, esophageal diverticulum, dysphagia, achalasia, or symptoms of dysmotility
  10. Subject has a history of any significant abdominal surgery
  11. Subject has had previous bariatric, gastric or esophageal surgery; intestinal obstruction; portal gastropathy; gastrointestinal tumors; esophageal or gastric varices, or gastroparesis
  12. Subject has a hiatal hernia > 2cm
  13. Subject has chronic/acute upper GI bleeding conditions
  14. Subject has severe coagulopathy (prothrombin time > 3 seconds over control or platelet count \< 100,000) or is presently taking heparin, coumadin, warfarin, or other anticoagulants or other medications which impede coagulation or platelet aggregation, if they cannot be ceased for the procedure
  15. Female subject is of childbearing age and not practicing effective birth control, is pregnant or is lactating
  16. Subject has symptomatic congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia or unstable coronary artery disease.
  17. Subject has cancer or life expectancy of \< 2 yrs
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Group A

    This group own twenty patients who met all the inclusion criteria. These will be treated with APC.

    Procedure: APC

  • Active comparator
    Group B

    This group own twenty patients who met all the inclusion criteria. These will be treated with APC plus Endoscopic Suture Technique (OverStitch TM).

    Procedure: APC · Device: Endoscopic Suture Technique (OverStitch TM)

Interventions

  • ProcedureAPC

    Ablation of the dilated gastro-jejunal anastomosis with Argon Plasma Coagulation. This procedure induces cicatrization process around the stoma and propitiates its reduction.

  • DeviceEndoscopic Suture Technique (OverStitch TM)

    OverStitchTM Endoscopic Suturing System. Stitches will be placed per-orally with the aforementioned device around the dilated stoma in order to reduce the diameter of the anastomosis. In this group, ablation with APC will be done immediately before suturing.

    Also known as: Apollo Overstitch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute Weight Loss

    Absolute Weight Loss will be assessed through subtraction of the pre-operative weight and the weight at follow-up, and will be measured in kilograms (kgs).

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at 12 months after the procedure

  2. Excess Weight Loss

    Excess Weight Loss will be assessed through calculation of the percentage of the overweight lost after the procedure at follow-up. Excess Weight is defined as the weight over BMI of 25 for each patient. Excess Weight Loss will be expressed as percentage (%).

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at 12 months after the procedure

  3. Abdominal Circumference Reduction

    Subtraction between baseline abdominal circumference and this measure at follow-up. This outcome will expressed in centimeters (cm).

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at 12 months after the procedure

  4. BMI reduction

    Subtraction between baseline BMI and this measure at follow-up. This outcome will expressed in kg/m2.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at 12 months after the procedure.

  5. Diabetes improvement

    This outcome will be assessed through a glucose tolerance test performed at baseline and another one performed at 1 year follow-up.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at baseline and 12 months after the procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of Adverse Events

    Adverse events such as perforation, bleeding, pain, stenosis, vomiting, need of surgery.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed continually after the procedure.

  2. Quality of Life Improvement

    This outcome will be assessed with SF-36 questionnaire.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months.

  3. Eating Habits Evaluation

    This outcome will evaluate if there is any change in eating habits with TFEQ-R21 questionnaire

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months.

  4. Gut Hormones Response

    This outcome will evaluate at fasting, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes post-prandial the hormonal variation regarding Ghrelin, GLP1 and PYY

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months.

  5. Gastric (Pouch) Emptying

    This outcome will evaluate retention rate through scintigraphy.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months.

  6. CT Volumetry of the Gastric Pouch

    This outcome will evaluate volumetry of the pouch before and 12 months after procedure through tridimensional computed tomography.

    Time frame: This outcome will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
    Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brunaldi VO, Farias GFA, de Rezende DT, Cairo-Nunes G, Riccioppo D, de Moura DTH, Santo MA, de Moura EGH. Argon plasma coagulation alone versus argon plasma coagulation plus full-thickness endoscopic suturing to treat weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):97-107.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3757. Epub 2020 Mar 23. PubMed 32217111 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03094936
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Responsible party
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura (Director, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2017
Start date
Apr 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2018 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 29, 2017

Study contacts

Ana C Cândido
Contact
ana.candido@hc.fm.usp.br
55-11-26619577
Vitor O Brunaldi, MD
Contact
vbrunaldi@gmail.com
55-11-26617579
Vitor O Brunaldi, MD
study chair · University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Eduardo G Hourneaux de Moura, PhD
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion