CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03090464Updated May 9, 2019

A 6-month Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Digital Disease Management Tool in Patients With T2DM

An observational study in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 46 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-09.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
328
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a complex, chronic disease that requires a comprehensive treatment plan aimed at meeting multitude therapeutic targets associated with micro- and macro-vascular risk reduction. There is evidence that patient support in various forms can have a significant positive impact on adherence to treatment and the meeting of targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of a digital disease management tool (Smart phone- web portal-based tool), in addition to Standard of Care for T2DM, will improve glycemic control. Other variables important in T2DM (such as weight, blood pressure, and lipid levels), will also be evaluated along with patient-reported outcomes, such as satisfaction with treatment and adherence to their antihyperglycemic treatment. Study duration is 6 months

Read the detailed description

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex, chronic disease that requires a comprehensive treatment plan aimed at meeting multitude therapeutic targets associated with micro- and macro-vascular risk reduction. There is evidence that patient support in various forms can have a significant positive impact on adherence to treatment and the meeting of targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A digital disease-management tool, smart phone- and web-based portal, has been developed that incorporates the following features aimed at improving patient and population outcomes:

Treatment management to help patients remember to take medications and track adherence; Goal setting, including medical nutrition therapy, appropriately prescribed physical activity, and weight loss for those patients who are overweight or obese; Tracking and data collection for blood glucose, weight, and exercise, as entered by the patient or automatically for activity via Bluetooth pedometer or activity tracker; Assessments to capture patient beliefs in order to tailor personalized content to individual needs; educational and motivational content in the form of short messages, text, and videos covering T2DM and its treatment, and lifestyle advice; Web portals to display collected data back to the patient and healthcare practitioner in real-time to allow better and timely management of diabetes.

This tool is added to the Standard of Care for T2DM. Data are collected for patients utilizing this tool, compared with those who are not. Clinical assessments as part of the Standard of Care are collected, as well as standard Patient Reported Outcomes for this disease.

Glycemic control is considered to be the goal of a T2DM disease management plan.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Digital disease management
  • T2DM
  • Hyperglycemia
  • Diabetes mellitus
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 328 is above the median of 233 across 2,220 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,429 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 357 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 173 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who are on 1 or more non-insulin antihyperglycemic medications for at least 6 months prior to enrollment.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of written informed consent;
  • Diagnosed with T2DM;
  • Male or female aged >/= 18 years at time of consent;
  • Treatment with 1 or more non-insulin antihyperglycemic medications for at least 6 months prior to enrollment;
  • Own or have access to a smart phone with internet access and have access to the internet via a tablet or personal computer at least once a day;
  • HbA1c levels must be obtained at the enrollment visit or up to 14 days prior to Visit 1 and must be >/=7.5% and \</=11.0%. Most of the hbA1c values obtained within the past 9 months must also be within this range;
  • Body mass index >/= 25 and \</=55 kg/mm2 within the last 3 months;
  • Ability to communicate in English;
  • Judged by their primary care physician to have suitable hearing, vision, manual dexterity, ability to understand instructions, and ability to use and understand smart phone and internet applications;
  • Negative pregnancy test for female subjects of childbearing potential.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy;
  • Insulin use at baseline;
  • Current use of a smart phone- or web portal-based tool designed to help with management of T2DM;
  • History of Type 1 diabetes or ketoacidosis;
  • Currently taking weight loss medication;
  • Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of this study;
  • Previous enrollment in the present study;
  • Participation in a clinical study with an investigational product or a disease state management program during the last 30 days;
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
328 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Standard of Care (SOC)

    Participants have standard of care with no access to digital disease management tool

  • SOC + digital disease management

    Participants have access to the digital disease management tool in addition to standard of care

    Other: Use of digital disease management tool

Interventions

  • OtherUse of digital disease management tool

    The purpose of the study is to evaluate if the provision of a digital disease management tool, in addition to SOC for T2DM, will improve glycemic control. The impact of the tool will be assessed in comparison to a Control group who will receive SOC alone. All participants will complete the PRO assessments. This is a real world study carried out at the point of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline to end of study (Month 6) in HbA1c levels

    Assessed from blood samples taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients who achieve HbA1c levels <7% at Month 6

    Assessed from blood samples taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 Months

  2. Mean change in body weight (kg) from baseline to Month 6

    Measures taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 Months

  3. Proportion of patients in both cohorts who intensify antihyperglycemic treatment from Visit 1

    Defined as an increase in dose or addition of a new antihyperglycemic agent not received at baseline

    Time frame: 6 Months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of times the smart phone- and/or web portal-based tool is accessed per patient

    Calculated by adding the total number of discrete log-in attempts to the tool for each patient using the tool at least once

    Time frame: 6 Months

  2. Length of time from first to last usage of smart phone- and/or web portal-based tool across the course of the study

    Determined by calculating the time from first to last log-in attempt for each patient accessing the tool at least twice during the course of the study

    Time frame: 6 Months

  3. Mean patient satisfaction with the digital disease management tool

    Assessed by the User Satisfaction Survey

    Time frame: 6 Months

  4. Mean percent change from baseline to Month 6 in systolic blood pressure

    Measures taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 Months

  5. Mean percent change from baseline to Month 6 in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)

    Assessed from blood samples taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 Months

  6. Percent of patients who achieve blood pressure <140/90 mmHg at Month 6

    Measures taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 Months

  7. Percent of patients who achieve LDL-C <100 mg/dL at Month 6

    Assessed from blood samples taken at visits per standard of care

    Time frame: 6 Months

  8. Differences in primary care office visits between active and control group during the 6-month study period

    As reported in patient records

    Time frame: 6 Months

  9. Differences in Emergency Room visits between active and control group during the 6-month study period as reported in patients at the end of the study

    As reported by patients at the end of the study

    Time frame: 6 Months

  10. Change in baseline to Month 6 in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Status version score

    As assessed in the Patient Reported Outcome measure Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Status version at the point-of-care visits

    Time frame: 6 Months

  11. Change in baseline to Month 6 in Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire score (16-question) (patient perception on ability to manage their disease)

    As assessed in the Patient Reported Outcomes measure Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire at the point-of-care visits

    Time frame: 6 Months

  12. Change in baseline to Month 6 in Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (8-item) (adherence)

    As assessed in the Patient Reported Outcome measure Morisky Medication Adherence Scale at the point-of-care visits

    Time frame: 6 Months

07

Study locations

46 sites
  • Research Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35209, United States
  • Research Site
    Birmingham, Alabama 35216, United States
  • Research Site
    Peoria, Arizona 85381, United States
  • Research Site
    Surprise, Arizona 85374, United States
  • Research Site
    Lincoln, California 95648, United States
  • Resezrch Site
    Montclair, California 91763, United States
  • Research Site
    North Hollywood, California 91606, United States
  • Research Site
    Spring Valley, California 91978, United States
  • Research Site
    Van Nuys, California 91405, United States
  • Research Site
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906, United States
  • Research Site
    Cooper City, Florida 33024, United States
  • Research Site
    DeLand, Florida 32720, United States
  • Research Site
    Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Reserarch Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32277, United States
  • Research Site
    Lake City, Florida 32055, United States
  • Research Site
    Ormond Beach, Florida 32174, United States
  • Research Site
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33026, United States
  • Research Site
    Port Orange, Florida 32127, United States
  • Research Site
    Tampa, Florida 33634, United States
  • Research Site
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • Research Site
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Research Site
    Oxon Hill, Maryland 20745, United States
  • Research Site
    Omaha, Nebraska 68134, United States
  • Research Site
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89128, United States
  • Research Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102, United States
  • Research Site
    Brooklyn, New York 11235, United States
  • Research Site
    New Windsor, New York 12553, United States
  • Research Site
    Westfield, New York 14787, United States
  • Research Site
    Greensboro, North Carolina 27410, United States
  • Research Site
    Franklin, Ohio 45005, United States
  • Research Site
    Downingtown, Pennsylvania 19335, United States
  • Research Site
    Charleston, South Carolina 29407, United States
  • Research Site
    Greer, South Carolina 29651, United States
  • Research Site
    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29588, United States
  • Research Site
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29301, United States
  • Research Site
    Tullahoma, Tennessee 37388, United States
  • Research Site
    Houston, Texas 77040, United States
  • Research Site
    Houston, Texas 77058, United States
  • Research Site
    Lampasas, Texas 76550, United States
  • Research Site
    Plano, Texas 75024, United States
  • Research Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
  • Research Site
    Burke, Virginia 22015, United States
  • Research Site
    Manassas, Virginia 20110, United States
  • Research Site
    Richmond, Virginia 23235, United States
  • Research Site
    Federal Way, Washington 98003, United States
  • Research Site
    Olympia, Washington 98502, United States
08

References and documents

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03090464
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2017
Start date
May 8, 2017
Primary completion
May 21, 2018
Completion
May 21, 2018
Last update
May 9, 2019

Study contacts

Kevin Sooben
study chair · AstraZeneca

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion