CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03087604Updated Jun 17, 2020Results posted

Loss of Resistance, w/wo Stimulation, For Epidural Placement

A Phase 4 interventional study of Thoracic epidural block and Electrical Nerve stimulation in Anesthesia, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-17.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized, observer-blinded, investigative trial is to determine if the use of electrical stimulation, compared to the traditional loss of resistance technique alone, improves the success rate of epidural catheter placement at an academic teaching institution.

Read the detailed description

All subjects will receive a thoracic epidural catheter placement at the level appropriate for their surgery and will be randomized to either have the epidural placed with a loss of resistance technique alone or loss of resistance technique with confirmation by nerve stimulation. In the traditional loss of resistance technique group, the epidural catheter will be placed after achieving loss of resistance to air. In the electrical stimulation group, following the location of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique (using air), nerve stimulation will be utilized to elicit a myotomal contraction of the abdominal or thoracic wall. Nerve stimulation will be started at a pulse width of 0.3 ms and a frequency of 1 Hz and a current of 0.2mA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • epidural catheter placement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,320 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 323 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 243 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults undergoing intra-thoracic or intra-abdominal procedures that normally would receive thoracic epidurals for post-operative analgesia will be eligible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with contraindications to regional anesthesia:
  • history of allergy to amide local anesthetics
  • presence of a progressive neurological deficit
  • patients that are on anticoagulant medications that prohibit placement of an epidural
  • Systemic infection
  • Infection at the site of placement
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Technique Group

    In the traditional loss of resistance technique group, the epidural catheter will be placed after achieving loss of resistance to air. After placement of the catheter a standard test dose of 3+2 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine will be administered.Solution for Thoracic epidural block.

    Procedure: Thoracic epidural block · Drug: Solution For Thoracic epidural block

  • Experimental
    Electric Stimulation Group

    In the electrical stimulation group, following the location of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique (using air), nerve stimulation will be utilized to elicit a myotomal contraction of the abdominal or thoracic wall. After placement of the catheter a standard test dose of 3+2 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine will be administered.Solution for Thoracic epidural block.Thoracic epidural block with Electrical Nerve stimulation

    Procedure: Thoracic epidural block · Procedure: Electrical Nerve stimulation · Drug: Solution For Thoracic epidural block

Interventions

  • ProcedureThoracic epidural block

    Thoracic epidural block with epidural placed with a loss of resistance technique alone.

  • ProcedureElectrical Nerve stimulation

    In the electrical stimulation group, following the location of the epidural space with a loss of resistance technique (using air), nerve stimulation will be utilized to elicit a myotomal contraction of the abdominal or thoracic wall.stimulating peripheral nerve catheters(19 Ga. x 90 cm StimuCath® Continuous Nerve Block Catheter with SnapLock™ Adapter (Arrow by Teleflex Medical, Morrisville, NC), and stimulation will be achieved using a B Braun Stimuplex HNS12 Nerve Stimulator product id 4892098.

  • DrugSolution For Thoracic epidural block

    Dose of 3+2 ml of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine

    Also known as: Lidocaine, Epinephrine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural

    will be determined by the detection of a loss of sensation to cold (ice) in at least two contiguous dermatomal levels, 15 minutes after administration of a test dose of lidocaine through the epidural catheter. If a loss of cold sensation is found, then the epidural placement will be classified as successful. If no loss of cold sensation is found, then the epidural placement will be classified as unsuccessful.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after administration of a test dose of lidocaine

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time Required to Place the Epidural Catheter

    The time required to place the epidural catheter will be recorded

    Time frame: From the initiation of procedure to end of procedure

  2. Number of Thoracic Spine Levels Attempted

    the number of thoracic spine levels attempted will be recorded

    Time frame: Thirty minutes after start of procedure.

07

Results

Posted Nov 23, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTraditional Technique GroupElectric Stimulation Group
Started5050
Completed5050
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimarySuccess Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural

will be determined by the detection of a loss of sensation to cold (ice) in at least two contiguous dermatomal levels, 15 minutes after administration of a test dose of lidocaine through the epidural catheter. If a loss of cold sensation is found, then the epidural placement will be classified as successful. If no loss of cold sensation is found, then the epidural placement will be classified as unsuccessful.

Time frame:
15 minutes after administration of a test dose of lidocaine
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Success Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural
ParticipantsTraditional Technique GroupElectric Stimulation Group
Success Rate of Placement of a Thoracic Epidural4145
SecondaryTime Required to Place the Epidural Catheter

The time required to place the epidural catheter will be recorded

Time frame:
From the initiation of procedure to end of procedure
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time Required to Place the Epidural Catheter
minutesTraditional Technique GroupElectric Stimulation Group
Time Required to Place the Epidural Catheter33.9 ± 12.824.0 ± 8.0
SecondaryNumber of Thoracic Spine Levels Attempted

the number of thoracic spine levels attempted will be recorded

Time frame:
Thirty minutes after start of procedure.

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over up to 30 minutes. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Traditional Technique Group0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Electric Stimulation Group0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Traditional Technique GroupElectric Stimulation GroupTotal
Mean63.2 ± 12.660.4 ± 15.461.8 ± 14.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Traditional Technique GroupElectric Stimulation GroupTotal
Female192746
Male312354
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Traditional Technique GroupElectric Stimulation GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American347
White454691
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • WakeForestUBMC
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dobson SW, Weller RS, Edwards C, Turner JD, Jaffe JD, Reynolds JW, Henshaw DS. A randomized comparison of loss of resistance versus loss of resistance plus electrical stimulation: effect on success of thoracic epidural placement. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Feb 9;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01584-x. PubMed 35139802 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 6, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03087604
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 22, 2017
Start date
Mar 17, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 11, 2017
Completion
Oct 11, 2017
Results posted
Nov 23, 2018
Last update
Jun 17, 2020

Study contacts

Sean Dobson, MD
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion